IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [netmod] *one* week 2nd WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-revised-datastores-07

Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net> Wed, 20 December 2017 11:42 UTC

Return-Path: <lberger@labn.net>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8D4412D890 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Dec 2017 03:42:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.902
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (768-bit key) header.d=labn.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ANGbG2D3dgv8 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Dec 2017 03:42:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gproxy2-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com (gproxy2-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com [69.89.18.3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DBDE2126B71 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Dec 2017 03:42:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from cmgw3 (unknown [10.0.90.84]) by gproxy2.mail.unifiedlayer.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB3291E1C12 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Dec 2017 04:25:11 -0700 (MST)
Received: from box313.bluehost.com ([69.89.31.113]) by cmgw3 with id oBR71w00u2SSUrH01BRAZl; Wed, 20 Dec 2017 04:25:11 -0700
X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.2 cv=XM9AcUpE c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=h1BC+oY+fLhyFmnTBx92Jg==:117 a=h1BC+oY+fLhyFmnTBx92Jg==:17 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=ocR9PWop10UA:10 a=u07AKapRAAAA:8 a=wU2YTnxGAAAA:8 a=KpH9rkeAy9x1duHln4YA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=SkebfZ6J2Mmvk2rLHZle:22 a=Yz9wTY_ffGCQnEDHKrcv:22
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=labn.net; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:Subject: References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Date:CC:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=T+yNKIVumY0j+sxHKvXF5z91lY5Jb5r4Bc83YttrhHE=; b=TUvkT6ViYwkHhE+SBcT9ey9jc+ vy2+rIF6vnMN1QkZtfDXuuaeI4WNY8lS+lnyUgf6VoPIvyefS95rGt4QoFF7aZRWZQLrpDosPnPef Jx9VauI7VDgkojKsj8Ap5/JhW;
Received: from pool-100-15-86-101.washdc.fios.verizon.net ([100.15.86.101]:47366 helo=[11.4.0.163]) by box313.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <lberger@labn.net>) id 1eRcUl-002xGQ-Nr; Wed, 20 Dec 2017 04:25:07 -0700
From: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
To: Martin Bjorklund <mbj@tail-f.com>
CC: draft-ietf-netmod-revised-datastores@ietf.org, netmod@ietf.org, netmod-chairs@ietf.org
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2017 06:25:04 -0500
Message-ID: <16073ab7280.27d3.9b4188e636579690ba6c69f2c8a0f1fd@labn.net>
In-Reply-To: <20171219.213101.692193824403742919.mbj@tail-f.com>
References: <80a900b3-716a-b11f-3472-7cae57662ba4@labn.net> <198a88e4-9b8b-945b-09a1-49fa9f57cbb0@labn.net> <20171219.213101.692193824403742919.mbj@tail-f.com>
User-Agent: AquaMail/1.12.0-651 (build: 101200001)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format="flowed"; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - box313.bluehost.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - labn.net
X-BWhitelist: no
X-Source-IP: 100.15.86.101
X-Exim-ID: 1eRcUl-002xGQ-Nr
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
X-Source-Sender: pool-100-15-86-101.washdc.fios.verizon.net ([11.4.0.163]) [100.15.86.101]:47366
X-Source-Auth: lberger@labn.net
X-Email-Count: 2
X-Source-Cap: bGFibm1vYmk7bGFibm1vYmk7Ym94MzEzLmJsdWVob3N0LmNvbQ==
X-Local-Domain: yes
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/4jdd6MSRSwrrrAWDaQRVBSSV4yg>
Subject: Re: [netmod] *one* week 2nd WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-revised-datastores-07
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2017 11:42:05 -0000


On December 19, 2017 3:31:34 PM Martin Bjorklund <mbj@tail-f.com> wrote:

> Hi Lou,
>
> Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net> wrote:
>> Hi,
...

>
>> 3) A minor point, the document uses the terms boot and reboot.  I
>> suspect that these terms are intended to cover any full or partial,
>> e.g., protocol, restart operation supported on a system - which may not
>> include a full boot.  I think the document needs to be clear on this
>> point.  Perhaps just add a definition, or note that full and partial
>> restart operations are included when the document refers to boot and reboot.
>
> RFC 6241 uses the same terms, so using them is at least consistent
> with that document.

Umm, so are pre-NMDA datastores.

>  I'm not sure I think they need to be defined in
> this document.

If the text above is accurate, I think something along its lined along its 
lined should be added.  If not accurate, then I think you have a new point 
to clarify...

Lou


>
>
> /martin
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email