Re: [netmod] Stephen Farrell's No Objection on draft-ietf-netmod-yang-json-09: (with COMMENT)

[Ladislav Lhotka <[e-mail]>]

> On 22 Mar 2016, at 09:10, Juergen Schoenwaelder <[e-mail]> wrote:
> 
> On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 06:10:57PM +0100, Eliot Lear wrote:
>> Hi Kent,
>> 
>> Thanks for the pointer.  The zeroconf draft is cool beans to be sure. 
>> That describes an enrollment mechanism for devices that make use of
>> 802.1AR.  Very ANIMAesque.  What I'm suggesting, and perhaps it's a bit
>> late for this draft, is just a statement in this draft along the lines
>> that "signing and verifying happens at the JSON level; see [ref] for how
>> to do it", and for extra credit an example would be exceedingly cool. 
>> That way we as developers know what to do (again, I'm neither a JSON nor
>> netmod expert - just trying to make use of what's there for what I am
>> expert at (or so I think)).
>> 
> 
> This I-D is an object encoding specification. Why would this document
> have to talk about possible object signatures?

+1

These issues are important but they should IMO be dealt with separately.

Thanks, Lada

> 
> /js
> 
> -- 
> Juergen Schoenwaelder           Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH
> Phone: [phone]         Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany
> Fax:   [phone]         <http://www.jacobs-university.de/>

--
Ladislav Lhotka, CZ.NIC Labs
PGP Key ID: E74E8C0C