Re: [netmod] draft-ietf-netmod-yang-tree-diagrams

Igor Bryskin <Igor.Bryskin@huawei.com> wrote:
> Hi,
> I have a question for the authors.
> Today a yang-tree-diagram represents extended YANG groupings , which
> often makes a tree hard to read/ understand. Do you think there could
> be a way to represent groupings as collapsed?

In draft -03, we added the option of printing the "uses statement",
e.g.:

    |        +---x active-route
    |        |  +--ro output
    |        |     +--ro route
    |        |        +--ro next-hop
    |        |        |  +---u next-hop-state-content
    |        |        +---u route-metadata

instead of:

    |        +---x active-route
    |        |  +--ro output
    |        |     +--ro route
    |        |        +--ro next-hop
    |        |        |  +--ro (next-hop-options)
    |        |        |     +--:(simple-next-hop)
    |        |        |     |  +--ro outgoing-interface?   if:interface-ref
    |        |        |     +--:(special-next-hop)
    |        |        |     |  +--ro special-next-hop?     enumeration
    |        |        |     +--:(next-hop-list)
    |        |        |        +--ro next-hop-list
    |        |        |           +--ro next-hop*
    |        |        |              +--ro outgoing-interface?   if:interface-ref
    |        |        +--ro source-protocol    identityref
    |        |        +--ro active?            empty
    |        |        +--ro last-updated?      yang:date-and-time

/martin

> 
> Thanks,
> Igor
> From:Lou Berger
> To:joel
> jaeggli,draft-ietf-netmod-yang-tree-diagrams@ietf.org,netmod@ietf.org,
> Date:2017-12-21 16:07:58
> Subject:Re: [netmod] draft-ietf-netmod-yang-tree-diagrams - IPR
> verfication request
> 
> No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft
> 
> Lou
> (co-author)
> 
> On 12/19/2017 1:39 PM, joel jaeggli wrote:
> > Authors, Contributors, WG,
> >
> > As part of the preparation for WG Last Call:
> >
> > Are you aware of any IPR that applies to drafts identified above?
> >
> > Please state either:
> >
> > "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"
> > or
> > "Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft"
> >
> > If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
> > (see RFCs 3669, 5378 and 8179 for more details)?
> >
> > If yes to the above, please state either:
> >
> > "Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules"
> > or
> > "No, the IPR has not been disclosed"
> >
> > If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think
> > appropriate.
> >
> > If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer
> > the
> > above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are
> > aware of any relevant IPR. This document will not advance to the next
> > stage until a response has been received from each author and listed
> > contributor. NOTE: THIS APPLIES TO ALL OF YOU LISTED IN THIS MESSAGE'S
> > TO LINES.
> >
> > If you are on the WG email list or attend WG meetings but are not
> > listed
> > as an author or contributor, we remind you of your obligations under
> > the IETF IPR rules which encourages you to notify the IETF if you are
> > aware of IPR of others on an IETF contribution, or to refrain from
> > participating in any contribution or discussion related to your
> > undisclosed IPR. For more information, please see the RFCs listed
> > above
> > and
> > http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/IntellectualProperty.
> >
> > Thank you,
> > NetMod WG Chairs
> >
> > PS Please include all listed in the headers of this message in your
> > response.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > netmod mailing list
> > netmod@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
> 
> _______________________________________________
> netmod mailing list
> netmod@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod

Re: [netmod] draft-ietf-netmod-yang-tree-diagrams - IPR verfication request