IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [netmod] adoption poll for yang-versioning-reqs-02

"Reshad Rahman (rrahman)" <rrahman@cisco.com> Wed, 20 March 2019 19:01 UTC

Return-Path: <rrahman@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CC88131200 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Mar 2019 12:01:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.502
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.502 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=OKb3JoZZ; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=gvnu/H8/
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 36WOU6zHOCpw for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Mar 2019 12:01:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com [173.37.86.75]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B544B131228 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Mar 2019 12:01:18 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1184; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1553108478; x=1554318078; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=6CsF4uEPPCmuFORdkH75otAJrs6EdOAEq2ujO72z3jc=; b=OKb3JoZZ7k+oSjZ5tTktCw0oN47kEBUWqQ/NmEktRupcEk/zYn10YumG Fd6ThZ89zNigTOe2SmKAJtRdsdyYUjlVeRZ31PfW6mX9dTygy9CCb1D+F imy6tQZveW6R5iX/Tv/E9qDq2H81tk79iZSijvv2i9fEqOzk2nSys7F90 o=;
IronPort-PHdr: 9a23:KiqytB3mAHzMgaYgsmDT+zVfbzU7u7jyIg8e44YmjLQLaKm44pD+JxKHt+51ggrPWoPWo7JfhuzavrqoeFRI4I3J8RVgOIdJSwdDjMwXmwI6B8vQE1fyLPvjaQQxHd9JUxlu+HToeUU=
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0ANAACZjZJc/5pdJa1lGwEBAQEDAQEBBwMBAQGBUQYBAQELAYE9UAOBXAQLJ4QNg0cDhFKKVZlegS6BJANUCwEBLIRAAheEUCI0CQ0BAQMBAQkBAwJtHAyFSwYjEQwBATcBDwIBCBoCJgICAjAVEAIEAQ0FgyKBXgMVAQKgGQKKFHGBL4J4AQEFgkeCQxiCDAiBCyQBizEXgUA/gREnH4JMhQEXgnMxgiaMaZgWCQKTLhmTZYsSkw4CBAIEBQIOAQEFgUw4KIEucBVlAYJBggqDbopTcoEoi2UBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.60,249,1549929600"; d="scan'208";a="537615377"
Received: from rcdn-core-3.cisco.com ([173.37.93.154]) by rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 20 Mar 2019 19:01:17 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-006.cisco.com (xch-aln-006.cisco.com [173.36.7.16]) by rcdn-core-3.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id x2KJ1GYi031772 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 20 Mar 2019 19:01:17 GMT
Received: from xhs-aln-002.cisco.com (173.37.135.119) by XCH-ALN-006.cisco.com (173.36.7.16) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Wed, 20 Mar 2019 14:01:14 -0500
Received: from xhs-aln-002.cisco.com (173.37.135.119) by xhs-aln-002.cisco.com (173.37.135.119) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Wed, 20 Mar 2019 14:01:14 -0500
Received: from NAM02-CY1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (173.37.151.57) by xhs-aln-002.cisco.com (173.37.135.119) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 20 Mar 2019 14:01:14 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-cisco-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=6CsF4uEPPCmuFORdkH75otAJrs6EdOAEq2ujO72z3jc=; b=gvnu/H8/JhhiAe4TPZHicDR7ImwApPfKpMDfSUmmXCOkNCv1C4NkaGbw+DoQTOtV3Y/tXHA4BUmUPqpPTn0lcC3qNwcnS/pjoArWC+2PQ3GoQ+bXORFbzh3SLnjTSJY+VY6vcGw7tPHVvEcMISFs07eZPEzaDHkEggQIai4fT08=
Received: from MN2PR11MB3695.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (20.178.252.156) by MN2PR11MB4111.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (20.179.150.96) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.1709.13; Wed, 20 Mar 2019 19:01:13 +0000
Received: from MN2PR11MB3695.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::4d5b:81c5:6ab2:c5d]) by MN2PR11MB3695.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::4d5b:81c5:6ab2:c5d%5]) with mapi id 15.20.1709.015; Wed, 20 Mar 2019 19:01:13 +0000
From: "Reshad Rahman (rrahman)" <rrahman@cisco.com>
To: "Rob Wilton (rwilton)" <rwilton@cisco.com>, Martin Bjorklund <mbj@tail-f.com>
CC: "netmod@ietf.org" <netmod@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [netmod] adoption poll for yang-versioning-reqs-02
Thread-Index: AQHU2dp7YypUbX6X+USrpPO25GlQu6YTGKGAgAAX0wCAAPlkAIAAUXGAgAAZ7YCAAEdbAP//yzyA
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2019 19:01:12 +0000
Message-ID: <2676EE99-AA69-4F46-B2FB-3B98C2BECB72@cisco.com>
References: <aee7d9770a2c4570a3185a1ebeef4c36@XCH-RCD-007.cisco.com> <20190320.083022.2046737837256499330.mbj@tail-f.com> <96f475459f6049bfa20c66412983f4a2@XCH-RCD-007.cisco.com> <20190320.145439.1107389062091531440.mbj@tail-f.com> <7bcc505f43154c80b6d57529ce429228@XCH-RCD-007.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <7bcc505f43154c80b6d57529ce429228@XCH-RCD-007.cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/10.10.6.190114
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=rrahman@cisco.com;
x-originating-ip: [2001:420:2840:1250:2421:2f0a:1dbc:638e]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: fcb934da-16e6-495a-2ac4-08d6ad666c28
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(2390118)(7020095)(4652040)(8989299)(4534185)(4627221)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(8990200)(5600127)(711020)(4605104)(2017052603328)(7153060)(7193020); SRVR:MN2PR11MB4111;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: MN2PR11MB4111:
x-ld-processed: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e,ExtAddr
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <MN2PR11MB4111D234094D1DEDB289BE95AB410@MN2PR11MB4111.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-forefront-prvs: 098291215C
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(396003)(366004)(346002)(136003)(376002)(39860400002)(189003)(199004)(105586002)(486006)(4326008)(82746002)(71200400001)(476003)(83716004)(2616005)(11346002)(7736002)(305945005)(6116002)(81166006)(68736007)(81156014)(5660300002)(446003)(186003)(46003)(71190400001)(8936002)(256004)(93886005)(6486002)(6436002)(6246003)(14454004)(8676002)(478600001)(229853002)(86362001)(4744005)(2906002)(6512007)(33656002)(316002)(53936002)(99286004)(6506007)(76176011)(25786009)(36756003)(106356001)(102836004)(97736004)(110136005)(58126008); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:MN2PR11MB4111; H:MN2PR11MB3695.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: cisco.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: VQqfvljnAMu2kZryVSS2FJrfKRpbTUQEqu3v5Jxa0Lu51MgMu7IddQdLleQXJhv9uKby/NjupXNxu555CNinzPUqPD+fA5g3n4XVZorCikazxe5Szcy7gPdEJC73hwHGRmxdNUyye+nWVD0VDVoNLpbeHM/y1h1J11nDI9jkvXgv3SDil5fCvhGISL8Z7K4NxwCtOLoIUTswvCDicYtzPYP9JhZsl/NhDmJpMu9nCteCGcXsVqCRvRJ5asBgtMrJBZWLw1uGCA5Zi64e08hnZ21gjYtvuDSMaWUKIT31XtMclGvzfWxcvjwDA9pDBUmY7gEF/zMmyonAY7s5ponCNGfXABA4VMW37q7sDcP+dLCfG/0uias1mJzeWXdwmesPF64OPM9uDOTTbGhYNyLoYT5zge6fGgGP2UwLXUyiuNg=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <FDCE6E506E5229448691002D1CF7E9DE@namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: fcb934da-16e6-495a-2ac4-08d6ad666c28
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 20 Mar 2019 19:01:12.9863 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: MN2PR11MB4111
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.36.7.16, xch-aln-006.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: rcdn-core-3.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/5wDA6D_rVa4748CIth8D2ENBUnI>
Subject: Re: [netmod] adoption poll for yang-versioning-reqs-02
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2019 19:01:32 -0000

Hi,

On 2019-03-20, 2:12 PM, "netmod on behalf of Rob Wilton (rwilton)" <netmod-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of rwilton@cisco.com> wrote:

    Hi Martin,
    
<snip>
    > 
    > >  I.e. you don't think that we should be using semantic  versioning at
    > > all
    > 
    > My objection is that I don't agree with the problem statement and I don't think
    > that we should allow NBC in published modules.
    
    But on a practical level this seems to be the same as stating:
    
    "Published YANG modules MUST never have any bugs in any config true nodes."
    
    Thanks,
    Rob

+1
My recollection/understanding of how this work started is that some members of the WG felt that there are and will be cases where published YANG modules (SDOs or native) have bugs and have to be updated in an NBC way.

Regards,
Reshad.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email