Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-schema-mount-07

Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net> Sat, 11 November 2017 03:31 UTC

Return-Path: <lberger@labn.net>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34EB81270AE for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Nov 2017 19:31:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.158
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.158 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DATE_IN_PAST_06_12=1.543, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-2.8, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (768-bit key) header.d=labn.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7PJlxfkYkK43 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Nov 2017 19:31:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gproxy7-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com (gproxy7-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com [70.40.196.235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 27C441200C1 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 Nov 2017 19:31:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from cmgw2 (unknown [10.0.90.83]) by gproxy7.mail.unifiedlayer.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD9C52160BD for <netmod@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 Nov 2017 20:06:50 -0700 (MST)
Received: from box313.bluehost.com ([69.89.31.113]) by cmgw2 with id YT6m1w00m2SSUrH01T6p6t; Fri, 10 Nov 2017 20:06:50 -0700
X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.2 cv=dZfw5Tfe c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=h1BC+oY+fLhyFmnTBx92Jg==:117 a=h1BC+oY+fLhyFmnTBx92Jg==:17 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=xqWC_Br6kY4A:10 a=sC3jslCIGhcA:10 a=n0GyCHDuJ4aEKEL0ZBYA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=labn.net; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version :Date:Message-ID:From:References:To:Subject:Sender:Reply-To:Cc:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=AR96UmkuCJrtlk4uMWKjR4znsgkdGqJOwd9QkaEUV80=; b=cM/E8UPv+kyb7ljJGZFw7xTrPB AonTkJy5hPEbTYnDGr8g51suV06pZTopN4B5XNyvpekKjHxkjZRBOLxfc9igfc/0u63qknJvYpSDj tJA06Q/v8oN0lB/qrgZEpCWck;
Received: from pool-100-15-86-101.washdc.fios.verizon.net ([100.15.86.101]:42656 helo=[IPv6:::1]) by box313.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from <lberger@labn.net>) id 1eDM86-000Aqt-FY; Fri, 10 Nov 2017 20:06:46 -0700
To: Robert Wilton <rwilton@cisco.com>, "netmod@ietf.org" <netmod@ietf.org>, Martin Bjorklund <mbj@tail-f.com>, Kent Watsen <kwatsen@juniper.net>
References: <47B1141C-8979-4910-B7CA-2114B9C0D352@juniper.net> <68c6a4d5-fd3e-efdb-9c34-f69f241d6a31@cisco.com> <874lq4oq94.fsf@nic.cz>
From: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
Message-ID: <2299aed7-8e99-ccfd-cc86-3e8d590b37f6@labn.net>
Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2017 00:50:09 +0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <874lq4oq94.fsf@nic.cz>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - box313.bluehost.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - labn.net
X-BWhitelist: no
X-Source-IP: 100.15.86.101
X-Exim-ID: 1eDM86-000Aqt-FY
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
X-Source-Sender: pool-100-15-86-101.washdc.fios.verizon.net ([IPv6:::1]) [100.15.86.101]:42656
X-Source-Auth: lberger@labn.net
X-Email-Count: 13
X-Source-Cap: bGFibm1vYmk7bGFibm1vYmk7Ym94MzEzLmJsdWVob3N0LmNvbQ==
X-Local-Domain: yes
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/5yrnGxWStqih9hPcHbbj3poUcPI>
Subject: Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-schema-mount-07
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2017 03:31:37 -0000


On 11/8/2017 9:26 PM, Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
>> 5. Sec 3.2. paragraph 2, last sentence: "are possible and such needs" =>
>> "are possible, and as such, needs"
> I actually don't understand neither this sentence nor what the point of
> such exceptions could possibly be.
> 

In the case of the example, LNEs, there is a relationship between 
interfaces in the parent and interfaces in the LNE that is known at the 
parent, but the LNE.  (Think host interface assigned to VM.)

Lou