Re: [netmod] choice/case in tree diagrams

Ladislav Lhotka <lhotka@nic.cz> Tue, 06 March 2018 15:26 UTC

Return-Path: <lhotka@nic.cz>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11708124E15 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Mar 2018 07:26:59 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GFRm3FDB8MA8 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Mar 2018 07:26:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from trail.lhotka.name (trail.lhotka.name [77.48.224.143]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A102C120454 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Tue, 6 Mar 2018 07:26:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: by trail.lhotka.name (Postfix, from userid 109) id 4FAB81820412; Tue, 6 Mar 2018 16:26:33 +0100 (CET)
Received: from localhost (unknown [89.24.57.191]) by trail.lhotka.name (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2E6BC182040D; Tue, 6 Mar 2018 16:26:30 +0100 (CET)
From: Ladislav Lhotka <lhotka@nic.cz>
To: Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>, Martin Bjorklund <mbj@tail-f.com>
Cc: netmod@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <20180306124825.joukx2lvszeehrzt@elstar.local>
References: <1520262414.7198.35.camel@nic.cz> <6a1ed43f-398b-4538-52aa-d7f8c219047e@tail-f.com> <c9a60629-a1de-0b5b-77a0-595f614bcad8@transpacket.com> <20180306.104411.829341372037212681.mbj@tail-f.com> <20180306124825.joukx2lvszeehrzt@elstar.local>
Mail-Followup-To: Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>, Martin Bjorklund <mbj@tail-f.com>, netmod@ietf.org
Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2018 16:26:50 +0100
Message-ID: <877eqp2pj9.fsf@nic.cz>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/61iX0VjXe13gONbjcQpazmUFKu8>
Subject: Re: [netmod] choice/case in tree diagrams
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2018 15:26:59 -0000

Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de> writes:

> On Tue, Mar 06, 2018 at 10:44:11AM +0100, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
>> 
>> OLD:
>> 
>>        <flags> is one of:
>>          rw  for configuration data
>>          ro  for non-configuration data, output parameters to rpcs
>>              and actions, and notification parameters
>>          -w  for input parameters to rpcs and actions
>>          -u  for uses of a grouping
>>          -x  for rpcs and actions
>>          -n  for notifications
>>          mp  for nodes containing a "mount-point" extension statement
>> 
>> NEW:
>> 
>>        <flags> is one of:
>>          rw  for configuration data
>>          ro  for non-configuration data, output parameters to rpcs
>>              and actions, and notification parameters
>>          -w  for input parameters to rpcs and actions
>>          -u  for uses of a grouping
>>          -x  for rpcs and actions
>>          -n  for notifications
>>          mp  for nodes containing a "mount-point" extension statement
>> 
>>          case nodes do not have any <flags>.
>
> I still think that it should be 'data node' instead of just
> 'data'. While not formally imported, the term 'data node' has a
> definition in RFC 7950.
>
> NEWER:
>
>         <flags> is one of:
>           rw  for configuration data nodes

If we keep it also for choices, then it has to be "schema nodes".

>           ro  for non-configuration data nodes, output parameters to rpcs
>               and actions, and notification parameters

Same here.

Lada

>           -w  for input parameters to rpcs and actions
>           -u  for uses of a grouping
>           -x  for rpcs and actions
>           -n  for notifications
>           mp  for nodes containing a "mount-point" extension statement
>
>           case nodes do not have any <flags>.
>  
> /js
>
> -- 
> Juergen Schoenwaelder           Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH
> Phone: +49 421 200 3587         Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany
> Fax:   +49 421 200 3103         <https://www.jacobs-university.de/>
>
> _______________________________________________
> netmod mailing list
> netmod@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod

-- 
Ladislav Lhotka
Head, CZ.NIC Labs
PGP Key ID: 0xB8F92B08A9F76C67