IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [netmod] [Errata Held for Document Update] RFC8407 (6899)

"John R. Levine" <johnl@iecc.com> Thu, 31 March 2022 16:55 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@iecc.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A21173A1AB6 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 31 Mar 2022 09:55:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.109
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.109 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=iecc.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oapP2mguBbSw for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 31 Mar 2022 09:55:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:43:6f73:7461]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B59BF3A173D for <netmod@ietf.org>; Thu, 31 Mar 2022 09:55:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 46836 invoked from network); 31 Mar 2022 16:55:41 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type; s=b6f2.6245dd0d.k2203; bh=wxjqnWah9vH41A+I1g/tZe0M3reQtW4RzOwjJnidxqQ=; b=eTC95u5XSmoM+SLopGzejUYdiZqXdxbONInXZtI7Gp0wa85Z646ukF98LCBOxjCSYEDG/IPWWRf7MTOeBKGgiNAFuVYtVNqirD2qGWeen0SQJhfvIvbtD1N14SFIWGdJs0vZliLKr9NL2g/8zeUUbwX18Ekh80PPSMvIw2o92bDzjcXC9l0HJOO1yjNBeenOAUPcIskvxHM8E6DyOWE6RvTRzSe4ODsO2Wxu4Q2mO4HnKMJfS5sr1Fr9fp5pf7C12BQoNWv+fzzhfh+xrKEaz/KQGfzFPkQtcdB3YI8AfekN4neiSL7op7nwxcGY/v5yclRzs7Jg6MBdMQGAGSO6Ow==
Received: from ary.qy ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTPS (TLS1.2 ECDHE-RSA AES-256-GCM AEAD) via TCP6; 31 Mar 2022 16:55:41 -0000
Received: by ary.qy (Postfix, from userid 501) id E324B3A1EBF3; Thu, 31 Mar 2022 12:55:40 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ary.qy (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FCBB3A1EBD5; Thu, 31 Mar 2022 12:55:40 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2022 12:55:40 -0400
Message-ID: <f3673d5b-73d3-3274-f9bf-35f2f9646940@iecc.com>
From: "John R. Levine" <johnl@iecc.com>
To: tom petch <ietfc@btconnect.com>, "mohamed.boucadair@orange.com" <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>, Kent Watsen <kent@watsen.net>
Cc: "rfc-ed@rfc-editor.org" <rfc-ed@rfc-editor.org>, "netmod@ietf.org" <netmod@ietf.org>
X-X-Sender: johnl@ary.qy
In-Reply-To: <AM7PR07MB62483BF8820925D14E7609C3A0E19@AM7PR07MB6248.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
References: <20220330212032.B1C784C1D2@rfcpa.amsl.com> <0100017fdcedaf32-a7793fc0-367f-4737-a505-6045ecfc74ed-000000@email.amazonses.com> <25000_1648704694_62453CB6_25000_113_1_315eaf0b15d04ffea9a7f1f5a7b07324@orange.com> <AM7PR07MB62483BF8820925D14E7609C3A0E19@AM7PR07MB6248.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/6M7kcMnNNb1oPJtcPz9aIBMLyIU>
Subject: Re: [netmod] [Errata Held for Document Update] RFC8407 (6899)
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2022 16:55:49 -0000

> There are not thousands of RFCs that include a "Module Review Checklist" :-), which is the purpose of this erratum. Thanks.
>
> <tp>
>
> I agree.  There may be lots of RFC in error because RFC8407 gets it wrong but if the update to the lots of RFC was wanted then it should have been investigated last Autumn when the announcement of the change to the TLP was made, an announcement that passed me by despite being on all the right mailing lists.

The fix to the TLP was my idea in the first place and it's not that big of 
a deal.  If you follow the link and read that part of the TLP, the actual 
license has never changed.  We just give it the correct name now.

Regards,
John Levine, johnl@taugh.com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies",
Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email