Re: [netmod] [Netmod-ver-dt] Regarding IPR on draft-verdt-netmod-yang-schema-comparison-00

Mahesh Jethanandani <> Tue, 10 March 2020 03:51 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61A6C3A0EDD; Mon, 9 Mar 2020 20:51:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id o5uTegixviZm; Mon, 9 Mar 2020 20:51:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::530]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9F5603A0ED0; Mon, 9 Mar 2020 20:51:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by with SMTP id m5so5705625pgg.0; Mon, 09 Mar 2020 20:51:05 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=4utLedrEmbJ+1DuC8rGKlY8i34seh/FMqAmC1cK23/w=; b=QCiFxOUBFnUybJRTW5A0Lu80TR89j5rFdEeqBXFPG5rqMibaB+imAMSNPHDTPk54ME 9StkzhC4HLmOY7zFIccdc+OVbgmWfiSG0bjhu+VixFZFMYDAoC1YZUN7HHhpeEL2Tg8b zYaNDnuJmrLs6VFKS7kO8QiYijgqhtzAHeoYrUWSqZCaiffzKAqcwPjA5wAwT7yw1AWh GKQWro4DSx61Ef05P5sfUUQrDp2KxidBEXDY2t5Ekb5C8rEJaE6qeup+hd67T5rczWFq A5pskvd1T40DuV5Tf5hZ/kPcaa2yeFSLYpxdvzi/npsPMvImuVyxOMVNWuPQpo284rbM sYDg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=4utLedrEmbJ+1DuC8rGKlY8i34seh/FMqAmC1cK23/w=; b=PQQYKOBH5jezjiTYpQxUfTwq/f7Xs8UdIOfcTfxgk+t16TxNevV/VLK1H2ZvNx5yck K4qDzypxnGQcTuPzF5GS3uBfeaxJ+Z1RBuffe0M9lbYLz+g66zSTHRu4Y7DGRORI2931 /nnMZvATGBBAcRWLBv6DH/b7TsCzhGPw5HPy8i51NGP3f9LpLoBaT7TTx9sHhNxFwln6 APqSxkNd41qu5Tn+l7hUuA5gxRyo0Tw7gwKO4wRYSPCu1r2ZWhMitDejwzxq7UyIjQz7 5/Pgrd7yKWDJUIUiEjgCYl8AEcCGW1RQvR8irDoHA5pkaK3U9Ulk+6TpigMzV+H7fsxL uw2Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ2fJxhqDpwjJGyeR9r0C0Zp+MxR2yY/7uSix4m2TKjTgJIoYK73 3oLOHXDg2KPtpw7R43K7tig=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: =?utf-8?q?ADFU+vvFmyzHVatYn19ty7YPxuygwftUeOsXr8zpeFiX?= =?utf-8?q?cElYfFlvro00GtvIh5ctvYoqdhielImseg=3D=3D?=
X-Received: by 2002:a63:650:: with SMTP id 77mr12847802pgg.201.1583812264617; Mon, 09 Mar 2020 20:51:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2601:647:5600:5020:c66:ef44:8f0b:9230? ([2601:647:5600:5020:c66:ef44:8f0b:9230]) by with ESMTPSA id 129sm21214188pfw.84.2020. (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 09 Mar 2020 20:51:03 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
From: Mahesh Jethanandani <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2020 20:51:02 -0700
Cc: Robert Wilton <>,,
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <>
References: <>
To: Lou Berger <>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [netmod] [Netmod-ver-dt] Regarding IPR on draft-verdt-netmod-yang-schema-comparison-00
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2020 03:51:35 -0000

Thanks to Benoit for pointing out …

No, I am not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft.


> On Mar 2, 2020, at 2:13 PM, Lou Berger <> wrote:
> Authors, Contributors, WG,
> As part of preparation for WG Adoption:
> Are you aware of any IPR that applies to drafts identified above?
> Please state either:
> "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"
> or
> "Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft"
> If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
> (see RFCs 3669, 5378 and 8179 for more details)?
> If yes to the above, please state either:
> "Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules"
> or
> "No, the IPR has not been disclosed"
> If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think
> appropriate.
> We note that all DT members are listed as contributors.  If you contributed to the document please respond.  Alternatively, please feel free to state that you didn't materially contribute to the draft and would like your name removed from the contribution section (and moved to acknowledgments after WG adoption).
> If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer the
> above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are
> aware of any relevant IPR. This document will not advance to the next
> stage until a response has been received from each author.
> If you are on the WG email list or attend WG meetings but are not listed
> as an author or contributor, we remind you of your obligations under
> the IETF IPR rules which encourages you to notify the IETF if you are
> aware of IPR of others on an IETF contribution, or to refrain from
> participating in any contribution or discussion related to your
> undisclosed IPR. For more information, please see the RFCs listed above
> and
> Thank you,
> NetMod WG Chairs
> PS Please include all listed in the headers of this message in your
> response.
> _______________________________________________
> Netmod-ver-dt mailing list