IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [netmod] draft-ietf-netconf-rfc7895bis-06 deviation query

Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de> Wed, 30 May 2018 05:39 UTC

Return-Path: <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEB4C12EB51 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 May 2018 22:39:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NBYooaq6x8pn for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 May 2018 22:39:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from anna.localdomain (anna.eecs.jacobs-university.de [IPv6:2001:638:709:5::7]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0EBD12E8DF for <netmod@ietf.org>; Tue, 29 May 2018 22:39:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by anna.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 501) id 911F421A0A81; Wed, 30 May 2018 07:39:33 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Wed, 30 May 2018 07:39:33 +0200
From: Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>
To: Rohit R Ranade <rohitrranade@huawei.com>
Cc: Robert Wilton <rwilton@cisco.com>, "netmod@ietf.org" <netmod@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <20180530053933.jvzkjgfnhxvhdmak@anna.jacobs.jacobs-university.de>
Reply-To: Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>
Mail-Followup-To: Rohit R Ranade <rohitrranade@huawei.com>, Robert Wilton <rwilton@cisco.com>, "netmod@ietf.org" <netmod@ietf.org>
References: <991B70D8B4112A4699D5C00DDBBF878A6BBB23B2@dggeml510-mbx.china.huawei.com> <71e76c7e-4043-d80a-73ac-1759e85cc5d7@cisco.com> <991B70D8B4112A4699D5C00DDBBF878A6BBB241F@dggeml510-mbx.china.huawei.com> <c8d34f1f-8dcc-2915-0d77-98300ae8067e@cisco.com> <991B70D8B4112A4699D5C00DDBBF878A6BBB2C11@dggeml510-mbx.china.huawei.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <991B70D8B4112A4699D5C00DDBBF878A6BBB2C11@dggeml510-mbx.china.huawei.com>
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180512
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/7F6YYi59l_AkApAfRXB8nUy2Fcc>
Subject: Re: [netmod] draft-ietf-netconf-rfc7895bis-06 deviation query
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 May 2018 05:39:37 -0000

On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 05:21:29AM +0000, Rohit R Ranade wrote:
> 
> Also what does it mean that state-modules have been "implemented" in the <running> data-store ?
>

The server implemented an empty set of objects. No client should have
an issue with that and a server may choose to report this (for example
if the server wants to have a single schema for all datastores).

I do not see why making this illegal would simplify anything. It seems
making this illegal just adds complexity for no value.

/js

-- 
Juergen Schoenwaelder           Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH
Phone: +49 421 200 3587         Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany
Fax:   +49 421 200 3103         <https://www.jacobs-university.de/>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email