IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [netmod] [Gen-art] Review: draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6021-bis-01

Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net> Thu, 16 May 2013 06:39 UTC

Return-Path: <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A83D921F90EB; Wed, 15 May 2013 23:39:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.481
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.481 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.118, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qmPlawyUcG4b; Wed, 15 May 2013 23:39:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from p130.piuha.net (p130.piuha.net [193.234.218.130]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DA2721F8EFD; Wed, 15 May 2013 23:39:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3D662CC48; Thu, 16 May 2013 09:39:34 +0300 (EEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at piuha.net
Received: from p130.piuha.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (p130.piuha.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GGGRA4rOVDzr; Thu, 16 May 2013 09:39:34 +0300 (EEST)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2a00:1d50:2::130]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F7D22CC3C; Thu, 16 May 2013 09:39:34 +0300 (EEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.3 \(1503\))
From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
In-Reply-To: <5190D9E8.7040004@joelhalpern.com>
Date: Thu, 16 May 2013 09:39:34 +0300
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <91318B87-41DC-448C-87D3-ABF8C9CF9BC2@piuha.net>
References: <5170722E.2070401@nostrum.com> <5171C416.5070105@joelhalpern.com> <518D0635.7040301@joelhalpern.com> <5190C181.8020500@cisco.com> <20130513103745.GB8186@elstar.local> <5190D9E8.7040004@joelhalpern.com>
To: "Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1503)
Cc: draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6021-bis.all@tools.ietf.org, gen-art@ietf.org, "A. Jean Mahoney" <mahoney@nostrum.com>, NETMOD Working Group <netmod@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [netmod] [Gen-art] Review: draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6021-bis-01
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netmod>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 May 2013 06:39:40 -0000

Thank you Joel for the review. These reviews are very much appreciated, and help me decide whether to recommend or not approval in the IESG tele chats. I plan to ballot no-objection for this document in today's IESG call.

FWIW - regarding the derived types for addresses - I think I would probably have had the same question as Joel. Perhaps a comment in the derived type would have helped clarify the issue to the readers.

Thanks,

Jari

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email