Re: [netmod] FW: WGLC for draft-ietf-tictoc-1588v2-yang

Hi Benoit,

The version of pyang used by the datatracker will be updated when the next
release installation is done, which I expect to be later today (6.62.1).

Best regards,

	Henrik

On 2017-09-21 01:54, Benoit Claise wrote:
> Dear Yuanlong,
> 
> The pyang bug has been fixed (thanks Martin).
> I updated my toolchain with the latest pyang version (and the latest 
> yanglint 0.13.49, btw).
> So no more errors at http://www.claise.be/IETFYANGPageCompilation.html 
> for your draft.
> 
> For the IETF tracker, I guess we have to wait until the next pyang 
> version (1.7.4) for Henrik to update pyang.
> 
> yangcatalog.org still needs to be updated with the latest validators.
> 
> Regards, Benoit
>>
>> Dear Benoit,
>>
>> Thank you much for the instruction and the explanation.
>>
>> There are errors shown in 
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tictoc-1588v2-yang/?include_text=1, 
>> but it passes validation by 
>> http://www.yangvalidator.com/draft-validator. It seems different 
>> versions of pyang were used and the results provided by our official 
>> site are inconsistent now.
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Yuanlong
>>
>> *From:*Benoit Claise [mailto:bclaise@cisco.com]
>> *Sent:* Friday, September 15, 2017 8:48 PM
>> *To:* Jiangyuanlong; netmod@ietf.org; Mehmet
>> *Cc:* tictoc@ietf.org
>> *Subject:* Re: [netmod] FW: WGLC for draft-ietf-tictoc-1588v2-yang
>>
>> Hi Yuanong,
>>
>> There is pyang error.
>> http://www.claise.be/IETFYANGPageCompilation.html
>>
>> ietf-ptp-dataset@2017-04-20.yang:294 
>> <mailto:ietf-ptp-dataset@2017-04-20.yang:294>: error: the value 
>> "0xFFFF" does not match its base type - not an integer
>>
>> However, this is a pyang problem. See 
>> https://github.com/mbj4668/pyang/issues/329 
>> <https://github.com/mbj4668/pyang/issues/329>
>>
>> Mehmet, can you please a YANG doctor. The YANG doctor review is 
>> normally done during IETF LC, but nothing prevents an early review.
>>
>> Regards, Benoit
>>
>>     Hi netmoders,
>>
>>     This draft does not tackle the general YANG problem, but provide a
>>     generic time synchronization module of 1588.
>>
>>     Some of you may have interests in time synchronization, some
>>     definitely not. But as experts in YANG, could you please have a
>>     review of this YANG module and give an expert opinion?
>>
>>     Thanks,
>>
>>     Yuanlong
>>
>>     -----Original Message-----
>>
>>     From: TICTOC [mailto:tictoc-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Karen
>>     O'Donoghue
>>
>>     Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2017 3:16 AM
>>
>>     To: tictoc@ietf.org <mailto:tictoc@ietf.org>
>>
>>     Cc: ntp@ietf.org <mailto:ntp@ietf.org>
>>
>>     Subject: [TICTOC] WGLC for draft-ietf-tictoc-1588v2-yang
>>
>>     Folks,
>>
>>     This message begins a 2 week working group last call (WGLC) for
>>     the following document:
>>
>>     YANG Data Model for IEEE 1588v2
>>
>>     https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tictoc-1588v2-yang/
>>
>>     Please review the referenced document and send any comments to the
>>     mailing list including your assessment of whether this document is
>>     mature enough to proceed to the IESG. Please note that these
>>     messages of support for progression to the mailing list are
>>     important and will be used to determine WG consensus to proceed.
>>
>>     Please send all comments in by Thursday 28 September 2017.
>>
>>     Thank you!
>>
>>     Karen
>>
>>     _______________________________________________
>>
>>     TICTOC mailing list
>>
>>     TICTOC@ietf.org <mailto:TICTOC@ietf.org>
>>
>>     https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tictoc
>>
>>     _______________________________________________
>>
>>     netmod mailing list
>>
>>     netmod@ietf.org <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
>>
>>     https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
>>
>>     .
>>
> 
> 