[netmod] Alissa Cooper's Abstain on draft-ietf-netmod-artwork-folding-09: (with COMMENT)

Alissa Cooper via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Wed, 04 September 2019 18:56 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietf.org
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 607B7120BB4; Wed, 4 Sep 2019 11:56:17 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Alissa Cooper via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: "The IESG" <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-netmod-artwork-folding@ietf.org, Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>, netmod-chairs@ietf.org, lberger@labn.net, netmod@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.100.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>
Message-ID: <156762337738.22782.18440951708689230098.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 04 Sep 2019 11:56:17 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/91Inu_cKuvIc4rTXEWF0jQxeUk4>
Subject: [netmod] Alissa Cooper's Abstain on draft-ietf-netmod-artwork-folding-09: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Sep 2019 18:56:18 -0000

Alissa Cooper has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-netmod-artwork-folding-09: Abstain

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netmod-artwork-folding/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

RFC 7994 is not a product of IETF consensus, so it seems inappropriate to
publish a consensus BCP predicated on requirements defined in RFC 7994 which
themselves do not have IETF consensus. This would be the only document related
to the RFC format in the last 10 years that I'm aware of that would be
published on the IETF stream.

There has been discussion about how embedding YANG models in RFCs seems like a
poor fit for a number of reasons. By standardizing line-folding mechanisms and
claiming them as a best practice, this document reinforces the root of that
problem rather than trying to fix it.