IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [netmod] schema mount and YANG library

Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net> Tue, 16 January 2018 15:46 UTC

Return-Path: <lberger@labn.net>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D840013152C for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Jan 2018 07:46:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.902
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (768-bit key) header.d=labn.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zVQFChKXCbIE for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Jan 2018 07:46:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gproxy10-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com (gproxy10-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com [69.89.20.226]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4860C12FAC8 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 Jan 2018 07:46:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from CMOut01 (unknown [10.0.90.82]) by gproxy10.mail.unifiedlayer.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA310140528 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 Jan 2018 08:46:25 -0700 (MST)
Received: from box313.bluehost.com ([69.89.31.113]) by CMOut01 with id z3mN1w0182SSUrH013mRmP; Tue, 16 Jan 2018 08:46:25 -0700
X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.2 cv=CqXPSjwD c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=h1BC+oY+fLhyFmnTBx92Jg==:117 a=h1BC+oY+fLhyFmnTBx92Jg==:17 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=xqWC_Br6kY4A:10 a=RgaUWeydRksA:10 a=48vgC7mUAAAA:8 a=tAv7CelNV0ADJ-CClv0A:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=w1C3t2QeGrPiZgrLijVG:22
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=labn.net; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version :Date:Message-ID:From:References:Cc:To:Subject:Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=1oio9udTb8yLcReNCHP+mXdAcSXIli6HrZ8aL5Uk61M=; b=CmhfHGN0TZjBcOUh0KAe29DfNo 9m/MiRPcrUzp2EprPskXU/+AlavjMitf1bB16SDY1xeN9Q61tFcB8owWUPfyrKb1+mDJNJtkw1em1 lH8UZaQtylNwPwn010cXCrXau;
Received: from pool-100-15-86-101.washdc.fios.verizon.net ([100.15.86.101]:53488 helo=[IPv6:::1]) by box313.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <lberger@labn.net>) id 1ebTRO-00478V-LH; Tue, 16 Jan 2018 08:46:22 -0700
To: Ladislav Lhotka <lhotka@nic.cz>, Martin Bjorklund <mbj@tail-f.com>
Cc: netmod@ietf.org
References: <160ff28ef68.27d3.9b4188e636579690ba6c69f2c8a0f1fd@labn.net> <20180116.145003.1110791592584714461.mbj@tail-f.com> <53c046c7-bd41-4a4b-ef61-0d3bf9414269@labn.net> <20180116.161347.1518992717170489943.mbj@tail-f.com> <1516116166.18487.18.camel@nic.cz>
From: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
Message-ID: <8f131d74-878a-6edb-a09c-6047b83dc6de@labn.net>
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2018 10:46:21 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.5.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <1516116166.18487.18.camel@nic.cz>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-US
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - box313.bluehost.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - labn.net
X-BWhitelist: no
X-Source-IP: 100.15.86.101
X-Exim-ID: 1ebTRO-00478V-LH
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
X-Source-Sender: pool-100-15-86-101.washdc.fios.verizon.net ([IPv6:::1]) [100.15.86.101]:53488
X-Source-Auth: lberger@labn.net
X-Email-Count: 14
X-Source-Cap: bGFibm1vYmk7bGFibm1vYmk7Ym94MzEzLmJsdWVob3N0LmNvbQ==
X-Local-Domain: yes
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/99y_ueHS5AkVgVbruC2xpNKyMbs>
Subject: Re: [netmod] schema mount and YANG library
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2018 15:46:58 -0000


On 1/16/2018 10:22 AM, Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
>>> I think
>>> it is incumbent upon those revisiting past/closed WG decisions (in
>>> this case, inline schema being represented by YL) to argue why the
>>> decision needs to be revisited.
>> I'm repeating my self: b/c the current solution doesn't work well with
>> the NMDA.
> We can try to update the draft and the examples, it should then be much more
> clear. It is really very little extra work.
>
> Lada
>

Lada,
     Understanding impact of your proposal on the following would be 
quite helpful:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtgwg-lne-model/ (pub requested)
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtgwg-ni-model/ (pub requested)
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-l3vpn-yang/

Lou

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email