IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6087bis-14

Martin Bjorklund <mbj@tail-f.com> Wed, 18 October 2017 06:45 UTC

Return-Path: <mbj@tail-f.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A2631321F5; Tue, 17 Oct 2017 23:45:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8CFNU_lduG7E; Tue, 17 Oct 2017 23:45:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.tail-f.com (mail.tail-f.com [46.21.102.45]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 136D41320CF; Tue, 17 Oct 2017 23:45:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (unknown [173.38.220.41]) by mail.tail-f.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 102D91AE030A; Wed, 18 Oct 2017 08:45:40 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2017 08:44:14 +0200
Message-Id: <20171018.084414.1757301754342626778.mbj@tail-f.com>
To: evoit@cisco.com
Cc: draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6087bis@ietf.org, netmod-chairs@ietf.org, netmod@ietf.org
From: Martin Bjorklund <mbj@tail-f.com>
In-Reply-To: <4862029103bb46d7b56013331d9e2d3c@XCH-RTP-013.cisco.com>
References: <EA300017-CDE0-4006-95D5-D2E81CBBE9E3@juniper.net> <644DA50AFA8C314EA9BDDAC83BD38A2E0EAB6C8C@sjceml521-mbx.china.huawei.com> <4862029103bb46d7b56013331d9e2d3c@XCH-RTP-013.cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Mew version 6.7 on Emacs 24.5 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/9SqJLxtkMtAPkabNPzHxkf004AA>
Subject: Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6087bis-14
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2017 06:45:43 -0000

Hi,

"Eric Voit (evoit)" <evoit@cisco.com> wrote:
> I was also encouraged to provide comments.  A couple (new?) minor ones...
> 
> Section 3.4:
> - If a tree diagram is included for an augmented model, it SHOULD
> contain the integrated of the augmented model.  I.e., use the pyang
> -f command to generate the tree so that you can explicitly see the
> schema elements imported  

I agree that it would be good if 3.4 talks about this case.

But I think that the recommendation should be that the "imported tree"
just shows the structure (containers and lists), but not all other
nodes.  For an example of what I mean, see Section 2 of RFC 7277.



/martin

v2.26.15 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status