IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [netmod] Clarification Question on draft-dsdt-nmda-guidelines-01

Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de> Tue, 13 June 2017 20:09 UTC

Return-Path: <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76C92129A92; Tue, 13 Jun 2017 13:09:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VJWcjK6Hf_xb; Tue, 13 Jun 2017 13:09:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from atlas5.jacobs-university.de (atlas5.jacobs-university.de [212.201.44.20]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1CE1C129A8D; Tue, 13 Jun 2017 13:09:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (demetrius5.irc-it.jacobs-university.de [10.70.0.222]) by atlas5.jacobs-university.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4DF476; Tue, 13 Jun 2017 22:09:35 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at jacobs-university.de
Received: from atlas5.jacobs-university.de ([10.70.0.217]) by localhost (demetrius5.jacobs-university.de [10.70.0.222]) (amavisd-new, port 10032) with ESMTP id LvaWGRmJjz3C; Tue, 13 Jun 2017 22:09:35 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from hermes.jacobs-university.de (hermes.jacobs-university.de [212.201.44.23]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "hermes.jacobs-university.de", Issuer "Jacobs University CA - G01" (verified OK)) by atlas5.jacobs-university.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Tue, 13 Jun 2017 22:09:35 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from localhost (demetrius4.jacobs-university.de [212.201.44.49]) by hermes.jacobs-university.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98E1320094; Tue, 13 Jun 2017 22:09:35 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at jacobs-university.de
Received: from hermes.jacobs-university.de ([212.201.44.23]) by localhost (demetrius4.jacobs-university.de [212.201.44.32]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2-MqQaqAaOkG; Tue, 13 Jun 2017 22:09:35 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from elstar.local (elstar.jacobs.jacobs-university.de [10.50.231.133]) by hermes.jacobs-university.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 510B020091; Tue, 13 Jun 2017 22:09:35 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by elstar.local (Postfix, from userid 501) id A47013FBEA83; Tue, 13 Jun 2017 22:09:32 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2017 22:09:31 +0200
From: Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>
To: Xufeng Liu <Xufeng_Liu@jabil.com>
Cc: "draft-dsdt-nmda-guidelines@ietf.org" <draft-dsdt-nmda-guidelines@ietf.org>, "netmod@ietf.org" <netmod@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <20170613200928.GA55527@elstar.local>
Reply-To: Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>
Mail-Followup-To: Xufeng Liu <Xufeng_Liu@jabil.com>, "draft-dsdt-nmda-guidelines@ietf.org" <draft-dsdt-nmda-guidelines@ietf.org>, "netmod@ietf.org" <netmod@ietf.org>
References: <BN3PR0201MB0867C18E5FF7239EE991F720F1C20@BN3PR0201MB0867.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <BN3PR0201MB0867C18E5FF7239EE991F720F1C20@BN3PR0201MB0867.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.0 (2016-04-01)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/9U-mb-_c78Q8QR-uV2jqQ665U9g>
Subject: Re: [netmod] Clarification Question on draft-dsdt-nmda-guidelines-01
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2017 20:09:39 -0000

Hi,

the typical -state tree consists of config false nodes and hence it
represents operational state. This is not a transitioning period
question, this is how -state trees were designed. Note also that the
applied configuration is part of the operational state in NMDA - for
config true objects, there is no difference between the applied
configuration value and the operationally used value - they are the
same.

/js

On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 07:53:32PM +0000, Xufeng Liu wrote:
> During discussing the adoption of this guidelines, a question came up w.r.t. the semantics of the non-NMDA "-state" module during the transitioning period:
> 
> What kind of state do the leaves in the "-state" module represent? The applied configuration or the actually used operational data?
> Since only of the two types can be represented, what is the guideline to model the other type?
> 
> Thanks,
> - Xufeng

-- 
Juergen Schoenwaelder           Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH
Phone: +49 421 200 3587         Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany
Fax:   +49 421 200 3103         <http://www.jacobs-university.de/>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email