IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [netmod] A ---- > B

"Rob Wilton (rwilton)" <rwilton@cisco.com> Thu, 16 July 2020 18:17 UTC

Return-Path: <rwilton@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02FF43A0101 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Jul 2020 11:17:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.12
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.12 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, SUBJ_ALL_CAPS=0.5, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=CTLDpgV+; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=ASOpffsy
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WlntIcni0BVq for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Jul 2020 11:17:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com [173.37.86.79]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9388D3A00D4 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 Jul 2020 11:17:00 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1150; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1594923420; x=1596133020; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=6lKjUb7UE8UKe8eXjlJNDUlHHNcGALncyzjw5ss3fak=; b=CTLDpgV+Wpz1RRjkj30mS2aUWO5g4nv2taVi3o9y51fvPfTKAcUPlPXT dIi/2bkmCCj6isjkVNW9t20pWUWD9IJnUkdNoJW6oH3yS639EvleTt0qe anm3bEkl/dfX3K6clvFZOkiTmIuNSbf0rHwJ9czb5fIpnKtcdSRYhqTgu I=;
IronPort-PHdr: 9a23:TuoZSBwedWS/Uf7XCy+N+z0EezQntrPoPwUc9psgjfdUf7+++4j5ZRaFt/9xh1jPW4jQ97RPjO+F+6zjWGlV55GHvThCdZFXTBYKhI0QmBBoG8+KD0D3bZuIJyw3FchPThlpqne8N0UGEtr1YFvUr3auqzUVH0a3OQ98PO+gHInUgoy+3Pyz/JuGZQJOiXK9bLp+IQ/wox/Ws5wdgJBpLeA6zR6arw==
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AJCAAKmRBf/4QNJK1gHQEBAQEJARIBBQUBggqBUlEHb1gvLAqHbwONR5heglMDVQsBAQEMAQEYCwoCBAEBhAhEAoITAiQ4EwIDAQELAQEFAQEBAgEGBG2FSRIMhW8BAQEBAwEBEBUTBgEBLAQICwQCAQgRBAEBHxAnCx0IAgQBEggagwWCSwMuAQ6gRAKBOYhhdIEBM4MBAQEFhTIYgg4DBoE4gmqGBIQEGoFBP4ERQ4JNPoJcAQGBYYNHgi21OQqCXZoBn0GRfJ59AgQCBAUCDgEBBYFqI4FXcBU7gmlQFwINjh5RgyCFFIVCdDkGgRKOGwGBEAEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.75,360,1589241600"; d="scan'208";a="798389154"
Received: from alln-core-10.cisco.com ([173.36.13.132]) by rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 16 Jul 2020 18:16:59 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-005.cisco.com (xch-rcd-005.cisco.com [173.37.102.15]) by alln-core-10.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 06GIGxpv015375 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 16 Jul 2020 18:16:59 GMT
Received: from xhs-rcd-003.cisco.com (173.37.227.248) by XCH-RCD-005.cisco.com (173.37.102.15) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Thu, 16 Jul 2020 13:16:59 -0500
Received: from xhs-rcd-001.cisco.com (173.37.227.246) by xhs-rcd-003.cisco.com (173.37.227.248) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Thu, 16 Jul 2020 13:16:58 -0500
Received: from NAM10-DM6-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (72.163.14.9) by xhs-rcd-001.cisco.com (173.37.227.246) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 16 Jul 2020 13:16:58 -0500
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=M3L94S6m+XG1aYa5SN/ROnbsIa8nT3MjE0+ynhkz6aKdzvuUwIafyNRvAfnwfx/NzFCAW6HUuB1OGMAYa3pglxpU+5Nsdyv35vnPy3P9swDVha15U3c4OYXWgoVZaHzn/IYBsdanKf2oG+SIYPZ6bAwedcgQ+IATbbBog4jJA9erd4wZmF3wHH2L00sEh7/h+NsUm/4NEyQ/XmamPZKDUViiuoRrndOYRbTbznQKic7Eq+OHArCyMuJxpkNaqi7EDdX/489MCMGCDsiuJHQn9emiIyORbtNi90sepwXd/mHOeKYqDNqb791Yx21thyK7GsoGroh3FToKbJOJu2hC3Q==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=5USBpUy/NWnX43DA2QdJGwsZVDlWsBQKQFt71N+w5Xw=; b=dECUUShAtf4ozPGqQlMwWaRqBb5pQdV3OxUc02H68JfHS25mpvlgd5xwjcIlbW1YiUan5u+Ua1JIllDH/dRPhGoI5N76VPqdaTsLLPE2UHQ4kAlCGK//v9PMIwJaNijOdr97s4DM45rbNyxATuIPYv1Bp7Q49eI5npd85aFMT7J23kyQSOj2kc0ZevKP1JcgSOVpmb+YjuD9YUjJVfusjCEdNj/5f2qQAHzLg/oaN7oesyn6tIYIolBVMR7lfCV3s0XRPTs2Jkb+Z3F7mjAdJuzs85dISThY+YKdehoMansv4lzTmGwnJ0UvF9ofUURZOwFnbUCcZE10JosK5QcysQ==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cisco.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cisco.com; dkim=pass header.d=cisco.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-cisco-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=5USBpUy/NWnX43DA2QdJGwsZVDlWsBQKQFt71N+w5Xw=; b=ASOpffsyQbNlYGkFyCl9kunlwH3xA2+28at+KXMaZH+Vv08Cp9Gnd5jkFjPxttAV0WmBh/jzauCfg66qU9cXoueC6hn7uRlDQUWj4wx5qWQ2msSd2wTUk4CsGMbWs4V4UmLZXEpLt/5is0wIXsgG/kxSYHGvxnVAZLTPGUq96eA=
Received: from MN2PR11MB4366.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:208:190::17) by MN2PR11MB4432.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:208:193::22) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3174.21; Thu, 16 Jul 2020 18:16:57 +0000
Received: from MN2PR11MB4366.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::e9d4:79b5:aef1:be18]) by MN2PR11MB4366.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::e9d4:79b5:aef1:be18%5]) with mapi id 15.20.3174.026; Thu, 16 Jul 2020 18:16:57 +0000
From: "Rob Wilton (rwilton)" <rwilton@cisco.com>
To: tom petch <ietfc@btconnect.com>, NETMOD Working Group <netmod@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: A ---- > B
Thread-Index: AQHWWr/Cq7MVOW5IYE2sF6qpoj6fk6kKfsBQ
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2020 18:16:57 +0000
Message-ID: <MN2PR11MB436630BCDDE3E831DE355E9DB57F0@MN2PR11MB4366.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
References: <158859819282.16144.11762511824828734226@ietfa.amsl.com>, <DB7PR07MB45224A311C4FBBAA4A58506CA0A70@DB7PR07MB4522.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <AM6PR07MB52229F16CB108477B3962BEFA07E0@AM6PR07MB5222.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <AM6PR07MB52229F16CB108477B3962BEFA07E0@AM6PR07MB5222.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: btconnect.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;btconnect.com; dmarc=none action=none header.from=cisco.com;
x-originating-ip: [64.103.40.19]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 6c58d1b9-ae16-469b-a651-08d829b46d46
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: MN2PR11MB4432:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <MN2PR11MB4432864AF804CCAB95187F66B57F0@MN2PR11MB4432.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:7691;
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: Iizjl+iBOCK4OpjHDiTzBN54myT8V65AZ4wFWMTYz+pPTJZ4n5LK/+EGI6LtgHRu6uypLwL7DPDl5j/yspC+6+a4YlHB4kax0ktRfizi0JOIA/dwbJdAu4tH6YyeRo9KiY7aoRgThQJKYQERXEkmbk55lilWmigeJBTwwMNJKbmXAtLWa9kePSYqMl1qlFjnAHC1qEvL7id2OgdW/+UOiecQLqOD/3++49tZ1T+UUUsFpNMzpkLFCR//xjuTUfQIOnrD6HtdBYgDq3ISykAS3QPnNZt0DcoR5fBXl9gsywUDjSLX6+NKwyFNf3/79m5Dbn3b6xTTPlA19xJFsIfo54P+C71oycYbQVTSoNY6YF5AUkqn9KwRx9WlyuKQSXiZpVGHka7jF/q47ynETRvOVQ==
x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:MN2PR11MB4366.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFTY:; SFS:(4636009)(136003)(396003)(346002)(366004)(376002)(39860400002)(66556008)(2906002)(8676002)(66446008)(64756008)(8936002)(186003)(7696005)(4744005)(33656002)(966005)(478600001)(26005)(76116006)(6506007)(53546011)(86362001)(71200400001)(110136005)(52536014)(66476007)(66946007)(83380400001)(9686003)(5660300002)(316002)(55016002)(296002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101;
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: CdU8WT8LhcZbLpddLpLvXmtYycxCZDMDTw8QGWR7l/NXiYeZXwX1SCCcH9kVyUgBdBjCbVb7CnpgtrbaFPh5vrC12k7iQ1sbPUCs4Tfh0fKSXrxmwmX08Aorjf8tOm7G0DcLCbL7SFtC2pr6YVprreGdiIqHjnnMbNVie/ihpI9IKtGUmwAwFXFhwI6MW6q+TFOt3V8Jn5vmPi304IsmHDkNrd1Wq9vTBiRJzQEF1QuXab08UY344AXAf53fLr9P7a5zftmanSiqh5M9Ar9SamYqG8feuNK6t8XRaJrVvzpUyPnjeqsWIxpjEBpg/3Kl+v2qrixzCbMtSbd57yeNCuXWkFm608LdQCPRBqlRLqhcFDQNFgw82tegDEGxymkmq9iltPH+Zjnao8SE9YmdgbLe2kPugO6bKGAYI+lSlUPqFd7vTgvC0bglv92//xqVYphYpQzKwj+MXc1L/POImjLyCzomcod1W2PVO+O7x8Q=
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Internal
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: MN2PR11MB4366.namprd11.prod.outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 6c58d1b9-ae16-469b-a651-08d829b46d46
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 16 Jul 2020 18:16:57.5534 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: 5GwfuygkY88uHmF8XsFQ7ca2ZLy0ozrx7stSY2yZWDgBOUb5trVwGNTylTmm+vvKCHeL/0Rf3vOK+ZMM+9hGWw==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: MN2PR11MB4432
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.37.102.15, xch-rcd-005.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: alln-core-10.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/9nLgxRtHeCVwRghnCX3bFyaV24Q>
Subject: Re: [netmod] A ---- > B
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2020 18:17:02 -0000

[As an individual]

I would say that the diagram would represent A augments B, since A has a dependency on B.  From a quick search this also appears the direction that a dependency arrow is represented in UML, in case that matters.

But I could also see how others could see the relationship the other way round.

I agree that doing it consistently is helpful.

Regards,
Rob


> -----Original Message-----
> From: netmod <netmod-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of tom petch
> Sent: 15 July 2020 16:51
> To: NETMOD Working Group <netmod@ietf.org>
> Subject: [netmod] A ---- > B
> 
> TEAS yang has a mountain of augment and several I-D represent that
> graphically
> 
> +-----+          +-----+
> I     I          I     I
> I  A  I   -----> I  B  I
> I     I          I     I
> +-----+          +-----+
> In some I-D this means A augments B
> In other I-D this means B augments A
> I would like consistency.  Is one approach more logical than the other?
> 
> Tom Petch
> _______________________________________________
> netmod mailing list
> netmod@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email