Re: [netmod] Proposal for minimalist full NMDA support in schema mount

[Lou Berger <[e-mail]>]

Rob,

     My/our proposal doesn't seem to help unblock the current impasse,  
as such I'll drop it and move on.

Thanks,

Lou

On 2/23/2018 9:52 AM, Robert Wilton wrote:
> Hi Lou,
>
> As per my public emails on this WG alias, and also private emails, you
> must know that both Martin, I, and others have been trying (for many
> weeks) to reach a compromise.
>
> I don't think that it is that I am unwilling to compromise, but more
> that I perceive that a different compromise solution is the right one.
> I.e. we publish a single draft that contains the model that you want now
> for pre NMDA solutions, and also a model that we think will work well in
> the post NMDA world that all of the IETF YANG models are moving to.
>
> Thanks,
> Rob
>
>
> On 23/02/2018 14:36, Lou Berger wrote:
>> Rob,
>>
>> I think we're going in circles here. We have one camp that wants to
>> replace the current module with pre 09 and is unwilling to discuss
>> compromise, and another camp that wants 08 published as is and has
>> been waiting for the working group and authors to submit aversion to
>> the IESG for publication based on the last call that completed in
>> November.
>>
>> The mail I sent that started this thread was sent with the hope of
>> finding a compromise. As you and Martin seem uninterested in
>> discussing a compromise, I not sure if it's worth pursuing this
>> thread. If I have misread your mails, and you are open to compromise
>> then we should continue this thread.
>>
>> If not and there is no interest in finding a compromise in the working
>> group and by the authors, I guess we're back to the plan of publishing
>> 08 and looking forward to protests.
>>
>> Lou
>>
>>
>>
>> .
>>
>