Re: [netmod] Proposal for minimalist full NMDA support in schema mount

Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net> Fri, 23 February 2018 15:36 UTC

Return-Path: <lberger@labn.net>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABBCC12D779 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 23 Feb 2018 07:36:29 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.902
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (768-bit key) header.d=labn.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8-jfl8WKd4zF for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 23 Feb 2018 07:36:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gproxy8-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com (gproxy8-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com [67.222.33.93]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6C96A127599 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Fri, 23 Feb 2018 07:36:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from cmgw2 (unknown [10.0.90.83]) by gproxy8.mail.unifiedlayer.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEC6F1AB159 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Fri, 23 Feb 2018 08:36:24 -0700 (MST)
Received: from box313.bluehost.com ([69.89.31.113]) by cmgw2 with id EFcM1x00M2SSUrH01FcQAV; Fri, 23 Feb 2018 08:36:24 -0700
X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.2 cv=M5g9E24s c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=h1BC+oY+fLhyFmnTBx92Jg==:117 a=h1BC+oY+fLhyFmnTBx92Jg==:17 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=xqWC_Br6kY4A:10 a=Op4juWPpsa0A:10 a=3ws5PubZchckdPC0rB0A:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=labn.net; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version :Date:Message-ID:From:References:To:Subject:Sender:Reply-To:Cc:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=icB0mX2gNy+UdVxpWQjK2/vZcBFs14lDU9syjOH82fQ=; b=v3q9Wis4c4OK4jQrmAUPX0Yz+D NOMRdaiVyQ+D2dy235ey0HIVGDZI/EhDdEGDKapgJ/vAnMgcDif6zhypNni/ZF7sNJeH8SznSws5Z qBEuZJVnznQRRBX7J4FE9vj5i;
Received: from pool-100-15-86-101.washdc.fios.verizon.net ([100.15.86.101]:49860 helo=[IPv6:::1]) by box313.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.89_1) (envelope-from <lberger@labn.net>) id 1epFOX-003F4a-18; Fri, 23 Feb 2018 08:36:21 -0700
To: Robert Wilton <rwilton@cisco.com>, Martin Bjorklund <mbj@tail-f.com>, netmod@ietf.org
References: <195c3186-25ce-3019-1eda-34096fbc8de3@cisco.com> <20180223.103628.1174590223555999274.mbj@tail-f.com> <61afc424-4131-2871-b752-59c086dd4727@labn.net> <20180223.135509.1022283362077802966.mbj@tail-f.com> <d95dfc69-8a84-840f-8dd4-ee3b38bfbdd3@labn.net> <8760c49e-1304-0d55-6e38-004dfaca570c@cisco.com> <161c3185fd0.27d3.9b4188e636579690ba6c69f2c8a0f1fd@labn.net> <145a8313-f649-9519-54d0-73726ece2a36@cisco.com>
From: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
Message-ID: <b4b92f95-f301-f471-f848-03f761932087@labn.net>
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2018 10:36:17 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <145a8313-f649-9519-54d0-73726ece2a36@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-US
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - box313.bluehost.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - labn.net
X-BWhitelist: no
X-Source-IP: 100.15.86.101
X-Exim-ID: 1epFOX-003F4a-18
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
X-Source-Sender: pool-100-15-86-101.washdc.fios.verizon.net ([IPv6:::1]) [100.15.86.101]:49860
X-Source-Auth: lberger@labn.net
X-Email-Count: 4
X-Source-Cap: bGFibm1vYmk7bGFibm1vYmk7Ym94MzEzLmJsdWVob3N0LmNvbQ==
X-Local-Domain: yes
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/9tpyxLtgGrAqg15E1TblSyXQeJo>
Subject: Re: [netmod] Proposal for minimalist full NMDA support in schema mount
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2018 15:36:30 -0000

Rob,

     My/our proposal doesn't seem to help unblock the current impasse,  
as such I'll drop it and move on.

Thanks,

Lou

On 2/23/2018 9:52 AM, Robert Wilton wrote:
> Hi Lou,
>
> As per my public emails on this WG alias, and also private emails, you
> must know that both Martin, I, and others have been trying (for many
> weeks) to reach a compromise.
>
> I don't think that it is that I am unwilling to compromise, but more
> that I perceive that a different compromise solution is the right one.
> I.e. we publish a single draft that contains the model that you want now
> for pre NMDA solutions, and also a model that we think will work well in
> the post NMDA world that all of the IETF YANG models are moving to.
>
> Thanks,
> Rob
>
>
> On 23/02/2018 14:36, Lou Berger wrote:
>> Rob,
>>
>> I think we're going in circles here. We have one camp that wants to
>> replace the current module with pre 09 and is unwilling to discuss
>> compromise, and another camp that wants 08 published as is and has
>> been waiting for the working group and authors to submit aversion to
>> the IESG for publication based on the last call that completed in
>> November.
>>
>> The mail I sent that started this thread was sent with the hope of
>> finding a compromise. As you and Martin seem uninterested in
>> discussing a compromise, I not sure if it's worth pursuing this
>> thread. If I have misread your mails, and you are open to compromise
>> then we should continue this thread.
>>
>> If not and there is no interest in finding a compromise in the working
>> group and by the authors, I guess we're back to the plan of publishing
>> 08 and looking forward to protests.
>>
>> Lou
>>
>>
>>
>> .
>>
>