Re: [netmod] FW: I-D Action: draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8022bis-06.txt

"Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com> Wed, 27 December 2017 17:25 UTC

Return-Path: <acee@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FABE1242EA; Wed, 27 Dec 2017 09:25:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.531
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.531 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BpMg_aNyYHsu; Wed, 27 Dec 2017 09:25:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alln-iport-6.cisco.com (alln-iport-6.cisco.com [173.37.142.93]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 844D81271DF; Wed, 27 Dec 2017 09:25:49 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=4616; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1514395549; x=1515605149; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: content-id:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=ONvJdpvJ6g3WZJiHiQbz4HRefYq41L0Q0E4XpZ9vco8=; b=AwJgbt+IzO2WXtTLLMxm/C+FIA8aNKESyogGURaasvp5U8TtoONqS2df sg5a0cdvEK9bmOcwV7gdbtJ9wpzsyluMQKSBwdKkj9jpOU/hGdRDiHooq Kc+/n1UFOvLBSmodIUne/FAIC/JDJYCnMun1JI11UeXTZyhGjVTELqmKx A=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0AXAQBg1kNa/4gNJK1dGQEBAQEBAQEBA?= =?us-ascii?q?QEBAQcBAQEBAYM+ZnQnB4N/iiSPFYIBlymCFQoYC4RJTwIahDs/GAEBAQEBAQE?= =?us-ascii?q?BAWsohSQBAQEDAQEhETobAgEIEgYCAiYCAgIlCxUCDgIEARKKLhCmPIInik0BA?= =?us-ascii?q?QEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEdgQ+CfYISgz+DLoMvAQEXhG2CZQWjTAKIAY0?= =?us-ascii?q?yghdlhTGLUI0kiTICERkBgTsBHzmBT28VGSSCKQmETniIaoEWAQEB?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.45,466,1508803200"; d="scan'208";a="49092644"
Received: from alln-core-3.cisco.com ([173.36.13.136]) by alln-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 27 Dec 2017 17:25:48 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-009.cisco.com (xch-rtp-009.cisco.com [64.101.220.149]) by alln-core-3.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id vBRHPmvL001538 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 27 Dec 2017 17:25:48 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com (64.101.220.155) by XCH-RTP-009.cisco.com (64.101.220.149) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1320.4; Wed, 27 Dec 2017 12:25:47 -0500
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) by XCH-RTP-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) with mapi id 15.00.1320.000; Wed, 27 Dec 2017 12:25:47 -0500
From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
To: "Benoit Claise (bclaise)" <bclaise@cisco.com>, NetMod WG <netmod@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-rip@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-rip@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [netmod] FW: I-D Action: draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8022bis-06.txt
Thread-Index: AQHTfwRmtyMCVakw5E6pebB4gVVRlKNXcWeA
Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2017 17:25:47 +0000
Message-ID: <D669419C.E70A5%acee@cisco.com>
References: <151396733267.27997.4142470279197260306@ietfa.amsl.com> <D662B94E.E5B50%acee@cisco.com> <9019c1c5-ea86-5620-5421-749b4aee35d9@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <9019c1c5-ea86-5620-5421-749b4aee35d9@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.116.152.198]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <0079E822C676A0488EEBA97927DD99DA@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/9u2EGG1Uo9dvk9odaOIL6mqVU00>
Subject: Re: [netmod] FW: I-D Action: draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8022bis-06.txt
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2017 17:25:51 -0000

Hi Benoit, 

On 12/27/17, 6:18 AM, "Benoit Claise (bclaise)" <bclaise@cisco.com> wrote:

>Thanks Acee,
>
>Minor question for the working group and the draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-rip
>authors.
>
>The appendix is about adding a new control-plane protocol. It takes as
>an example RIP.
>However, draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-rip is being finalized (on the IESG
>telechat on Jan 11th).
>Does it make sense to keep the RIP example? If so, is the example
>consistent with draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-rip?
>Or should we just point to draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-rip as the example?

It is probably better just to reference the RIP module draft. Does anyone
disagree?

Thanks,
Acee 
>
>Not strong views on my side.
>
>Regards, Benoit
>> This version includes Martin’s YANG doctor comments and some updates to
>> the examples (e.g., YANG Library data) from Lada.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Acee
>>
>> On 12/22/17, 1:28 PM, "netmod on behalf of internet-drafts@ietf.org"
>> <netmod-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of internet-drafts@ietf.org> wrote:
>>
>>> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
>>> directories.
>>> This draft is a work item of the Network Modeling WG of the IETF.
>>>
>>>         Title           : A YANG Data Model for Routing Management
>>>(NDMA
>>> Version)
>>>         Authors         : Ladislav Lhotka
>>>                           Acee Lindem
>>>                           Yingzhen Qu
>>> 	Filename        : draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8022bis-06.txt
>>> 	Pages           : 77
>>> 	Date            : 2017-12-22
>>>
>>> Abstract:
>>>    This document contains a specification of three YANG modules and one
>>>    submodule.  Together they form the core routing data model that
>>>    serves as a framework for configuring and managing a routing
>>>    subsystem.  It is expected that these modules will be augmented by
>>>    additional YANG modules defining data models for control-plane
>>>    protocols, route filters, and other functions.  The core routing
>>>data
>>>    model provides common building blocks for such extensions -- routes,
>>>    Routing Information Bases (RIBs), and control-plane protocols.
>>>
>>>    The YANG modules in this document conform to the Network Management
>>>    Datastore Architecture (NMDA).  This document obsoletes RFC 8022.
>>>
>>>
>>> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8022bis/
>>>
>>> There are also htmlized versions available at:
>>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8022bis-06
>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8022bis-06
>>>
>>> A diff from the previous version is available at:
>>> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8022bis-06
>>>
>>>
>>> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of
>>> submission
>>> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
>>>
>>> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
>>> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> netmod mailing list
>>> netmod@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
>> _______________________________________________
>> netmod mailing list
>> netmod@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
>