Re: [netmod] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8199 (5924)

Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com> Mon, 02 December 2019 09:59 UTC

Return-Path: <bclaise@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F1F212004C for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Dec 2019 01:59:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.501
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.501 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zDmUOQI75l67 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Dec 2019 01:59:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from aer-iport-1.cisco.com (aer-iport-1.cisco.com [173.38.203.51]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A3EA4120041 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Mon, 2 Dec 2019 01:59:28 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2101; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1575280768; x=1576490368; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date: mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=8q6ZhRCTHC4bIW+61g0G6NHfRleUzLdugGWOvPtWqJE=; b=FcHjX9R4ZL2Wxm4a94XAHbVeCZK9bKLmiEpYzcla7J4AmDI94eRFwJRy q5K+Gs/VnDuiqhCNZCgJr2vacVCn6AXxm4XoBcaJOgevWhiftLXaNzskP lftuOzHv1ItpXGAPwF1V+WZ87vzyMKyaRRQP/prNelzC7WVWJ3st9xbWO 0=;
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.69,268,1571702400"; d="scan'208";a="19889638"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-4.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 02 Dec 2019 09:59:26 +0000
Received: from [10.55.221.36] (ams-bclaise-nitro3.cisco.com [10.55.221.36]) (authenticated bits=0) by aer-core-4.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id xB29xLUh021889 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 2 Dec 2019 09:59:24 GMT
To: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, dean@voltanet.io, camoberg@cisco.com, ibagdona@gmail.com, warren@kumari.net, joelja@bogus.com, kent+ietf@watsen.net, lberger@labn.net
Cc: mohamed.boucadair@orange.com, netmod@ietf.org
References: <20191202075242.02483F406F2@rfc-editor.org>
From: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <eb6b6f65-3989-ec1b-d2d5-b779c0d0cea4@cisco.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2019 10:59:20 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20191202075242.02483F406F2@rfc-editor.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
X-Authenticated-User: bclaise
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 10.55.221.36, ams-bclaise-nitro3.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: aer-core-4.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/AZfeI14XBL4JHJYBTj0Y_Kiit0I>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 02 Dec 2019 07:53:12 -0800
Subject: Re: [netmod] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8199 (5924)
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Dec 2019 09:59:31 -0000

Dear all,

This errata should be accepted.

Regards, B.
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8199,
> "YANG Module Classification".
>
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5924
>
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Editorial
> Reported by: Mohamed Boucadair <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>
>
> Section: Section 6.1
>
> Original Text
> -------------
> 6.1.  Normative References
>
> ...
>
>     [RFC8049]  Litkowski, S., Tomotaki, L., and K. Ogaki, "YANG Data
>                Model for L3VPN Service Delivery", RFC 8049,
>                DOI 10.17487/RFC8049, February 2017,
>                <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8049>.
>
> Corrected Text
> --------------
> 6.1.  Informative References
>
> ...
>
>     [RFC8049]  Litkowski, S., Tomotaki, L., and K. Ogaki, "YANG Data
>                Model for L3VPN Service Delivery", RFC 8049,
>                DOI 10.17487/RFC8049, February 2017,
>                <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8049>.
>
> Notes
> -----
> RFC8049 is cited only as an example (Section 2.1):
>
> "An example of a Network Service YANG Module is in [RFC8049]..."
>
> Not sure why it was listed as normative.
>
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party
> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.
>
> --------------------------------------
> RFC8199 (draft-ietf-netmod-yang-model-classification-08)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : YANG Module Classification
> Publication Date    : July 2017
> Author(s)           : D. Bogdanovic, B. Claise, C. Moberg
> Category            : INFORMATIONAL
> Source              : Network Modeling
> Area                : Operations and Management
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG
> .
>