IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [netmod] iana-if-type.yang has multiple revisions with the same date

Benoit Claise <benoit.claise@huawei.com> Thu, 03 March 2022 19:24 UTC

Return-Path: <benoit.claise@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DD8A3A10D5 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Mar 2022 11:24:21 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.338
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.338 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, INVALID_MSGID=0.568, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wmBNiAPMmXfI for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Mar 2022 11:24:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com [185.176.79.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 911223A10D4 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Thu, 3 Mar 2022 11:24:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from fraeml741-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.147.207]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4K8gqm5W30z67LZL; Fri, 4 Mar 2022 03:23:00 +0800 (CST)
Received: from fraeml736-chm.china.huawei.com (10.206.15.217) by fraeml741-chm.china.huawei.com (10.206.15.222) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2308.21; Thu, 3 Mar 2022 20:24:13 +0100
Received: from fraeml736-chm.china.huawei.com ([10.206.15.217]) by fraeml736-chm.china.huawei.com ([10.206.15.217]) with mapi id 15.01.2308.021; Thu, 3 Mar 2022 20:24:13 +0100
From: Benoit Claise <benoit.claise@huawei.com>
To: Jürgen Schönwälder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>, William Lupton <wlupton@broadband-forum.org>
CC: NetMod WG <netmod@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [netmod] iana-if-type.yang has multiple revisions with the same date
Thread-Index: AQHYLWuKC+iToWzlhk6ccsVq23D3Cayqi2oAgALKDgCAAH4RgIAADcmAgAAU4ACAABd+Qw==
Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2022 19:24:13 +0000
Message-ID: 11E004AA-3C5F-4D1D-BD60-103912CAC246
References: <CAEe_xxiTdvGscUqhuC=Kuh70C-=MRnA8GgjupC2vBfkK6_p+kw@mail.gmail.com> <CABCOCHR+yKwL7kkV2_Teha-Vnc8AJ9Q8QhZyjYwjaj286=vR_g@mail.gmail.com> <CAEe_xxgF+qtQ_9Yzm5q5k2rnubt_gOj9BOEnRsYeJXnyAxXoZw@mail.gmail.com> <CABCOCHRRXDTEwWXTv9USFc5yw99DG_Oktk4iChsvzDsSAQeBBA@mail.gmail.com> <CAEe_xxjZpt0JVgiE5o2fw=OVwohveF-Yz3Cb3LVg3bHReOEUtQ@mail.gmail.com>, <20220303190008.25d3xantvohwlyia@anna>
In-Reply-To: <20220303190008.25d3xantvohwlyia@anna>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_11E004AA3C5F4D1DBD60103912CAC246_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/AgSsZ41BiusLkwd-jLdwODzJdLI>
Subject: Re: [netmod] iana-if-type.yang has multiple revisions with the same date
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2022 19:24:22 -0000

+1  to Jürgen point of view.

Regards, Benoit

From:Jürgen Schönwälder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>
To:William Lupton <wlupton@broadband-forum.org>
Cc:NetMod WG <netmod@ietf.org>
Date:2022-03-03 20:01:06
Subject:Re: [netmod] iana-if-type.yang has multiple revisions with the same date

The obvious thing to do in this particular case (where there are only
allocations of new values) is to collapse the revisions and to move
on. Slightly better would be to ensure this does not happen again.

/js

On Thu, Mar 03, 2022 at 05:45:25PM +0000, William Lupton wrote:
> > It is too late to do anything about this module.
>
> This module is republished every time a new ifType is added. Are you saying
> that it would be unacceptable to collapse the duplicate revisions next time
> it's updated? If so then we will live with this FOR EVER!
>
> >

> _______________________________________________
> netmod mailing list
> netmod@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod


--
Jürgen Schönwälder              Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH
Phone: +49 421 200 3587         Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany
Fax:   +49 421 200 3103         <https://www.jacobs-university.de/>

_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
netmod@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email