Re: [netmod] I-D Action: draft-ietf-netmod-module-tags-09.txt
Christian Hopps <chopps@chopps.org> Thu, 03 October 2019 15:15 UTC
Return-Path: <chopps@chopps.org>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35A5C120921 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Oct 2019 08:15:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QAXmcZdRNb3O for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Oct 2019 08:15:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.chopps.org (smtp.chopps.org [54.88.81.56]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CBE012008D for <netmod@ietf.org>; Thu, 3 Oct 2019 08:15:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from stubbs.int.chopps.org (unknown [172.222.100.236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by smtp.chopps.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 01F5B6057A; Thu, 3 Oct 2019 11:15:40 -0400 (EDT)
From: Christian Hopps <chopps@chopps.org>
Message-Id: <4ED3E9FA-9B58-4E9C-AA88-CFF4260A9E90@chopps.org>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_C6743A7F-E173-465B-90DF-952500604A4B"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\))
Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2019 11:15:40 -0400
In-Reply-To: <MN2PR11MB43662800E2F593864E130468B59F0@MN2PR11MB4366.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Cc: Christian Hopps <chopps@chopps.org>, "netmod@ietf.org" <netmod@ietf.org>
To: "Rob Wilton (rwilton)" <rwilton@cisco.com>
References: <156942813583.28879.894232837346561087@ietfa.amsl.com> <8F9EDBC3-EB9C-452E-9091-03DBBC735CAB@chopps.org> <MN2PR11MB43662800E2F593864E130468B59F0@MN2PR11MB4366.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/AjOSoykhbnQVPnDoO3-qi7ei4qs>
Subject: Re: [netmod] I-D Action: draft-ietf-netmod-module-tags-09.txt
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2019 15:15:50 -0000
[resending to include list cc] > On Oct 3, 2019, at 5:45 AM, Rob Wilton (rwilton) <rwilton@cisco.com> wrote: > > Hi Chris, > > As discussed offline, you have left out the "masked-tag" container in the "modules-tags-state" module. One might read this as an objection that was discussed offline, but I don't think you are objecting, you're just stating what happened, correct? > For consistently, I wonder, whether there shouldn't also be a comment in the "masked-tag" leaf-list in the main NMDA compatible module to indicate that "masked-tag" isn't reported in the operational state datastore because the information is combined into the "tag" leaf-list. Ok, color me confused. For NMDA, why wouldn't masked-tag show up in operational datastore? Isn't the operational datastore the union of the applied intended config (config true nodes) plus the config false nodes? Non-NMDA has no concept of "applied" (operational state of config true nodes), that is why masked-tags don't go in the module-tags-state container. The user can still read the configured masked-tag value on the normal non-deprecated module in the non-NMDA case. Thanks, Chris. > > Thanks, > Rob > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: netmod <netmod-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Christian Hopps >> Sent: 25 September 2019 17:19 >> To: netmod@ietf.org >> Subject: Re: [netmod] I-D Action: draft-ietf-netmod-module-tags-09.txt >> >> This adds the deprecated non-NMDA state module. >> >> Thanks, >> Chris. >> >>> On Sep 25, 2019, at 12:15 PM, internet-drafts@ietf.org wrote: >>> >>> >>> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts >> directories. >>> This draft is a work item of the Network Modeling WG of the IETF. >>> >>> Title : YANG Module Tags >>> Authors : Christian Hopps >>> Lou Berger >>> Dean Bogdanovic >>> Filename : draft-ietf-netmod-module-tags-09.txt >>> Pages : 18 >>> Date : 2019-09-25 >>> >>> Abstract: >>> This document provides for the association of tags with YANG modules. >>> The expectation is for such tags to be used to help classify and >>> organize modules. A method for defining, reading and writing a >>> modules tags is provided. Tags may be registered and assigned during >>> module definition; assigned by implementations; or dynamically >>> defined and set by users. This document also provides guidance to >>> future model writers; as such, this document updates RFC8407. >>> >>> >>> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: >>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netmod-module-tags/ >>> >>> There are also htmlized versions available at: >>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-netmod-module-tags-09 >>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-netmod-module-tags-09 >>> >>> A diff from the previous version is available at: >>> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-netmod-module-tags-09 >>> >>> >>> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of >>> submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at >> tools.ietf.org. >>> >>> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: >>> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> netmod mailing list >>> netmod@ietf.org >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod >>> >
- [netmod] I-D Action: draft-ietf-netmod-module-tag… internet-drafts
- Re: [netmod] I-D Action: draft-ietf-netmod-module… Christian Hopps
- Re: [netmod] I-D Action: draft-ietf-netmod-module… Rob Wilton (rwilton)
- Re: [netmod] I-D Action: draft-ietf-netmod-module… Christian Hopps
- Re: [netmod] I-D Action: draft-ietf-netmod-module… Rob Wilton (rwilton)
- Re: [netmod] I-D Action: draft-ietf-netmod-module… Christian Hopps
- Re: [netmod] I-D Action: draft-ietf-netmod-module… Andy Bierman
- Re: [netmod] I-D Action: draft-ietf-netmod-module… Andy Bierman
- Re: [netmod] I-D Action: draft-ietf-netmod-module… Qin Wu
- Re: [netmod] I-D Action: draft-ietf-netmod-module… Andy Bierman
- Re: [netmod] I-D Action: draft-ietf-netmod-module… Rob Wilton (rwilton)