IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [netmod] Comment on draft-clacla-netmod-yang-model-update-02

Joe Clarke <jclarke@cisco.com> Wed, 15 November 2017 10:34 UTC

Return-Path: <jclarke@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B65BF126CC7 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Nov 2017 02:34:22 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.521
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.521 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Dfn7OvMd5Vmd for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Nov 2017 02:34:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com [173.37.86.75]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9668912706D for <netmod@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Nov 2017 02:34:21 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=566; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1510742061; x=1511951661; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:mime-version: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=8qKEpzmSQs8US+JEho0A9rKRoy/MS/ziAmdEk+Pj3Qw=; b=l1XWu/ni0Qqg8XTbodLQzU3l5DPwWOtXPu2DDummeNrfmABvCw4syGvD M3edh2zBl5tYH7iVbgQ5Z2jgrPp2jNENSw8yCElX/t5GWxWqTJO1J3v1Y qY78IVS7Qt/ldUfvJNgVB6WpREe3zD134xj3Izwil2+roOkhYLslfi+4z g=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0CoAACjFwxa/4YNJK1dGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQcBAQEBAYM2gVKEJoofjyGBfZZaghEKhTsChQc/GAEBAQEBAQEBAWsohR8BBSNmCw4KAgImAgJXBgEMCAEBiiCnc4InixcBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBASGBD4IlggeBVYISgwGFAoMrgmMFkwWPMpUGgXwZiWqHRYoyi3uBOR84gXRVJRWDLoR8I4kXAQEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.44,398,1505779200"; d="scan'208";a="320852483"
Received: from alln-core-12.cisco.com ([173.36.13.134]) by rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 15 Nov 2017 10:34:20 +0000
Received: from [10.24.101.203] ([10.24.101.203]) by alln-core-12.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id vAFAYIYZ001690; Wed, 15 Nov 2017 10:34:19 GMT
To: Martin Bjorklund <mbj@tail-f.com>, netmod@ietf.org
References: <20171114212210.7b2g3t3nqzrhcgrs@elstar.local> <20171115053046.nr33ypoibdn4jufv@elstar.local> <9094b945-366f-145d-fbc1-5cf116f4a3bc@cisco.com> <20171115.095341.1585161898755400575.mbj@tail-f.com> <407c8a67-dfea-da19-96a7-b65f9523d8de@cisco.com> <20171115102903.yivnjvanrt4wdarh@elstar.local>
From: Joe Clarke <jclarke@cisco.com>
Organization: Cisco
Message-ID: <3868e5f1-b243-bce6-c391-20e7640158fb@cisco.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2017 05:34:17 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.13; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20171115102903.yivnjvanrt4wdarh@elstar.local>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/Atp6xgB6hPZ4x9bxfCm54-Jtia0>
Subject: Re: [netmod] Comment on draft-clacla-netmod-yang-model-update-02
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2017 10:34:23 -0000

On 11/15/17 05:29, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 05:19:33AM -0500, Joe Clarke wrote:
>>
>> In a semver world, obsolete nodes could be reintroduced with vendor
>> modules via augments or in proprietary trees.
>>
> 
> This obviously does not fix a client that got broken (without updating
> the client). Is it generally true that clients always move at least as
> fast as servers?

In my experience, it depends.  It may sometimes be quicker to apply
patches to a client versus update a server (or a collection of servers).

Joe

v2.28.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status