Re: [netmod] Query about augmenting 'config false' YANG

[Robert Wilton <[e-mail]>]

Looks valid to me.

Thanks,
Rob


On 15/12/2017 14:02, Ivory, William wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I’m running into a problem where my YANG is being rejected by a 
> NETCONF client that claims it can’t find the node being augmented.  
> The YANG snippet below shows the problem which relates specifically to 
> augmenting a node that is ‘config false’. AFAICT from reading RFC 
> 6020, this is valid YANG, but I would appreciate confirmation from the 
> experts!
>
> Pyang is quite happy with this.
>
> Thanks,
>
> William
>
> --- sample yang to show problem ---
>
>                 grouping state-grouping {
>
> container state {
>
> config false;
>
> leaf state-grp-state-leaf {
>
> type string;
>
> }
>
> }
>
>                 }
>
> container test {
>
> container state-cont {
>
> config false;
>
> leaf state-leaf {
>
> type string;
>
> }
>
> }
>
>                 }
>
>                 augment /test/state-cont {
>
> // Augment 'config false' container directly works.
>
> leaf augmented-state-leaf {
>
> type string;
>
> }
>
>                 }
>
>                 augment /test {
>
> uses state-grouping {
>
> // Augment here fails - 'state' not found.
>
> augment state {
>
> leaf aug-state-grp-leaf {
>
> type string;
>
> }
>
> }
>
> }
>
>                 }
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> netmod mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod