IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8022bis-01

"Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com> Sun, 17 December 2017 16:58 UTC

Return-Path: <acee@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25B6D126579; Sun, 17 Dec 2017 08:58:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.521
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.521 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UQuXuw1L0fs3; Sun, 17 Dec 2017 08:58:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com [173.37.86.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E3BC51200F1; Sun, 17 Dec 2017 08:58:01 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=3052; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1513529881; x=1514739481; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=OzqGshuQGjrCiskSOW0KitWKF0DkoSuPiGhlG0VBGgY=; b=SEl+IrOsjpuQy4wI6pBtbxgeq6UoKrE5iQC19sPhHcJTX347PlVj3wZ5 HEWV+vT22DCH3fFZB/0bkONnvJFMpSQMka0FMimzKsDTKAtkCEJdQz6fd IXd0CPFqN+3J2GIkXyuWfXTnYjzcZwGX5M2kAb7HnAiGE33xP9MzaIN2n I=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0D3AABXoTZa/4gNJK1dGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQcBAQEBAYM+ZnQnB4N/iiGPCYIAlyGCFQoYDYRHTwIahGY/GAEBAQEBAQEBAWsohSQBAQQBASEROgsQAgEIDgoCAiYCAgIlCxUQAgQBDQWKKhCoV4InimYBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEYBYEPgl+CDoM/gyyDLgEYgW2CfoJjBaM8Aod9jS2CFoYTi0qKTYJOiTACERkBgToBHzmBT28VPIIphFZ4AYkqgRUBAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.45,417,1508803200"; d="scan'208";a="327240886"
Received: from alln-core-3.cisco.com ([173.36.13.136]) by rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 17 Dec 2017 16:58:00 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-011.cisco.com (xch-rtp-011.cisco.com [64.101.220.151]) by alln-core-3.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id vBHGw0gV020188 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Sun, 17 Dec 2017 16:58:00 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com (64.101.220.155) by XCH-RTP-011.cisco.com (64.101.220.151) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1320.4; Sun, 17 Dec 2017 11:57:59 -0500
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) by XCH-RTP-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) with mapi id 15.00.1320.000; Sun, 17 Dec 2017 11:57:59 -0500
From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
To: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>, NetMod WG <netmod@ietf.org>
CC: NetMod WG Chairs <netmod-chairs@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8022bis-01
Thread-Index: AQHTdecPhSAo6kKOv0CHaR8SVGCwjKNHxIIA
Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2017 16:57:59 +0000
Message-ID: <D65C0ACB.E2B1E%acee@cisco.com>
References: <8568e55c-29c6-272e-dd9f-7d1b150edba6@labn.net> <44e5318a-4157-b825-b688-5185ab2458cb@labn.net>
In-Reply-To: <44e5318a-4157-b825-b688-5185ab2458cb@labn.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.116.152.198]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <409701999A65DA4F8FDA64E6E94D7144@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/CUBcQ5-5I6gohGsWajeKqxIxAnI>
Subject: Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8022bis-01
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2017 16:58:04 -0000

Hi Lou, et al, 

The only issue we are struggling with is whether we need to specify the
version in the ietf-interfaces import. We have noted that
draft-ietf-netmod-rfc7277bis-01.txt does not import by revision.

We also have so nits:

   1. Add an informative reference for
[I-D.ietf-netmod-yang-tree-diagrams].
   2. Based on a comment from Vladimir, we added the prefix for
ietf-routing.yang, “rt:”, to several references within ietf-routing.yang.
Was this necessary? Of course, the model compiles with or without the
prefix. 

Thanks,
Acee

On 12/15/17, 3:55 PM, "netmod on behalf of Lou Berger"
<netmod-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of lberger@labn.net> wrote:

>All,
>	This last call is closed.
>
>We note that there was an update during the LC and that no comments were
>received during the LC period.  As this is simply a mechanical update
>that has been discussed in the WG we plan to proceed with the
>publication process.
>
>Authors,
>	Please let/us the WG know when you have published a version ready for
>publication.  Also please let the WG know what has changed in the
>document since the start of LC (rev -01)
>
>Thank you,
>NetMod Chairs
>
>
>
>On 11/29/2017 12:26 PM, Lou Berger wrote:
>> All,
>> 
>> This starts a two-week working group last call on
>> draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8022bis-01.
>> 
>> Please recall that this update's intention is to
>> modify the YANG module to be in line with the NMDA
>> guidelines [1].  Reviewing the diff between the two
>> drafts [2] should reveal just this.
>> 
>> The working group last call ends on December 13.
>> Please send your comments to the netmod mailing list.
>> 
>> Positive comments, e.g., "I've reviewed this document
>> and believe it is ready for publication", are welcome!
>> This is useful and important, even from authors.
>> 
>> [1] https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-dsdt-nmda-guidelines-01
>> [2] 
>>https://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?difftype=--hwdiff&url1=rfc8022.txt&url2=dr
>>aft-ietf-netmod-rfc8022bis-01.txt
>> 
>> Thank you,
>> Netmod Chairs
>> 
>
>_______________________________________________
>netmod mailing list
>netmod@ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email