IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [netmod] Proposal for minimalist full NMDA support in schema mount

Kent Watsen <kwatsen@juniper.net> Tue, 27 February 2018 14:03 UTC

Return-Path: <kwatsen@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6FE712D87B for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 Feb 2018 06:03:13 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=juniper.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MHrAJXIcche9 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 Feb 2018 06:03:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx0b-00273201.pphosted.com (mx0a-00273201.pphosted.com [208.84.65.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 50CB112D876 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Tue, 27 Feb 2018 06:03:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0108157.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-00273201.pphosted.com (8.16.0.22/8.16.0.22) with SMTP id w1RDx5fi014146; Tue, 27 Feb 2018 06:03:11 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=juniper.net; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : mime-version; s=PPS1017; bh=kIZZckLUDh0kQn24Qbic+MyaQCBygXEDWna9RKvdKrM=; b=SIOgB0E6zpmTLWSeHeKSJkDCfwXqMG9tqRikKV86QOYzLyMfGboHXLYr64cHHw2cRMeP RbRKVcJotgdHmxfTQSBZJohl07pgckGMaxzq4RGjnoHcsbidU4r4TO7pLr/AKUMwJr5f qesxPjFYuvqkuarPQ4l5//YwaL+mAIGdFr965cjmtCWBEiAjRmxsVNJOap6NrpmgYOVL IcGOfpRUjqtfjcxBzF/zBr/XnwjExIY1jpU+nU7JbmSUM7PH0FAV6+rJggn7Toq6jXg1 kFgKXGr6Q33Jmr2EBvNluJNVbMVVCNGjweHRrBurcN/3/Bo2Eo/AZq3CAf9DOPn84CZz Gw==
Received: from nam02-cy1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-cys01nam02lp0054.outbound.protection.outlook.com [207.46.163.54]) by mx0a-00273201.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2gd829827u-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 27 Feb 2018 06:03:09 -0800
Received: from DM5PR05MB3484.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.174.240.147) by DM5PR05MB2953.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.168.176.141) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.548.6; Tue, 27 Feb 2018 14:03:07 +0000
Received: from DM5PR05MB3484.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::507:f464:b89a:c64b]) by DM5PR05MB3484.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::507:f464:b89a:c64b%3]) with mapi id 15.20.0548.013; Tue, 27 Feb 2018 14:03:07 +0000
From: Kent Watsen <kwatsen@juniper.net>
To: Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>
CC: Martin Bjorklund <mbj@tail-f.com>, "netmod@ietf.org" <netmod@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [netmod] Proposal for minimalist full NMDA support in schema mount
Thread-Index: AQHTq/ojL3reZVxzTECb6kWhgoY5faOwqXoAgAESIACAAdqFAIAB4X+AgAEg5QCAADcXgIABIxwAgABcuFc=
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2018 14:03:07 +0000
Message-ID: <02FF992B-BFFD-4E7E-A2F5-250105AFDDD0@juniper.net>
References: <87woz2a3x1.fsf@chopps.org> <596f5e0b-301e-e102-bcae-c3421b24455b@cisco.com> <87lgfg9ded.fsf@chopps.org> <20180226.160921.622063322182936097.mbj@tail-f.com>, <20180227083116.xtlnju34s7ksjntc@elstar.local>
In-Reply-To: <20180227083116.xtlnju34s7ksjntc@elstar.local>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [96.231.191.4]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; DM5PR05MB2953; 7:Z1teg9N4kCiRAo/WQNGmmn7gwebrKe2I/IzmDMBAXW5nyasBl/VGb/pRZDkhYwO7oT5ZUenyhBlZuNEffSYdoKF09IoCzE0w9e40GjLYAl4qRKWu5hFJRWJy8DQmSpY/qY2r0LzREg01vonlH2h3TErIY5fmRpbmlJeWtf4JaAOdPaxfuBCgLjW9B0gZcvxu61/iVZ0K0zzS3ZNDb+IBp02FaLXAgEZWphBaLBGLjRZubivaT/w+qtECRYsCtLkX
x-ms-exchange-antispam-srfa-diagnostics: SSOS;
x-ms-office365-filtering-ht: Tenant
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: ca140ac6-b9be-49a7-2d9c-08d57dead436
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(7020095)(4652020)(48565401081)(5600026)(4604075)(3008032)(4534165)(4627221)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(2017052603307)(7153060)(7193020); SRVR:DM5PR05MB2953;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: DM5PR05MB2953:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <DM5PR05MB2953574436C551A8D8757280A5C00@DM5PR05MB2953.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:;
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(8211001083)(6040501)(2401047)(8121501046)(5005006)(3002001)(3231220)(944501161)(93006095)(93001095)(10201501046)(6055026)(6041288)(20161123564045)(20161123562045)(20161123558120)(20161123560045)(201703131423095)(201702281528075)(20161123555045)(201703061421075)(201703061406153)(6072148)(201708071742011); SRVR:DM5PR05MB2953; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:DM5PR05MB2953;
x-forefront-prvs: 05961EBAFC
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(376002)(346002)(39380400002)(366004)(396003)(39860400002)(189003)(199004)(26005)(81166006)(81156014)(6916009)(3280700002)(6246003)(186003)(4326008)(82746002)(36756003)(561944003)(478600001)(33656002)(93886005)(7736002)(54906003)(54896002)(6512007)(8676002)(3660700001)(8936002)(25786009)(14454004)(83716003)(53936002)(5250100002)(5660300001)(229853002)(102836004)(2950100002)(3846002)(6116002)(6506007)(59450400001)(2906002)(97736004)(316002)(86362001)(68736007)(106356001)(76176011)(6486002)(66066001)(2900100001)(6436002)(99286004)(105586002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:DM5PR05MB2953; H:DM5PR05MB3484.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1; LANG:en;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: juniper.net does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: 7QBjdRqbRgZLgv/iNPmKhr3hHzEzIV3OdvntTQ1eHoM8w3dZCrDp24FVNdmq8ThbdpfhFhH86QItPN9ji+i7rpeiwzuo4ZwV73Y8d95EBX0pCRMeDKj2aIiXpyg102sg/PgCgkYMj338LfPZWlIHHlgYUs9f9bA4v1OOjHe+NuE=
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_02FF992BBFFD4E7EA2F5250105AFDDD0junipernet_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: ca140ac6-b9be-49a7-2d9c-08d57dead436
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 27 Feb 2018 14:03:07.6781 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: bea78b3c-4cdb-4130-854a-1d193232e5f4
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DM5PR05MB2953
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:, , definitions=2018-02-27_05:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_spam_notspam policy=outbound_spam score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1011 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=884 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1711220000 definitions=main-1802270176
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/CWJT13RHPMHVS1t3cKCVTlK_8pE>
Subject: Re: [netmod] Proposal for minimalist full NMDA support in schema mount
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2018 14:03:14 -0000


So it this a possible way out of the current situation? We publish a
trimmed down document that just defines the mount point extension and
we do an update of this document that adds all the details needed to
obtain the schema information?

/js

+1

This was something I suggested a while back.  Though I didn’t detail this specific proposal, rather something along the lines of removing unnecessary parts, in order to reduce the debt carried forward as much as possible.

Kent   // contributor

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email