Re: [netmod] [yang-doctors] Quirky YANG

Mahesh Jethanandani <mjethanandani@gmail.com> Wed, 03 October 2018 23:38 UTC

Return-Path: <mjethanandani@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92DDE130DBE; Wed, 3 Oct 2018 16:38:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iZ1Jd-D36WPw; Wed, 3 Oct 2018 16:38:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pf1-x430.google.com (mail-pf1-x430.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::430]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AD9CE12F295; Wed, 3 Oct 2018 16:38:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pf1-x430.google.com with SMTP id k19-v6so2433518pfi.1; Wed, 03 Oct 2018 16:38:20 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=zSyQo8mfwoR8QHjfxREaZk4mB8tSlTRYiXougbsi/DQ=; b=scgKBycltVzpP79pN/SZ5gguikQvMPRTKFoCheLbW9VP75JY6EuFvVDW6DCjh+pehn FL7neh676pgqQywh+QbZljaCg2gVEcDKakujTKVy+S9VQZS7qMUqnOI266d69zhm1PN1 zVEvkfu7m9iI/B47gkN+UwJofOR6SVda7xZo5eSdJDWrDQTEXT+rLrDqdGPv75pOF1TE ICVgpymCwMntuwSn4cnA4HjuMEnAtYtnSFE1IjESLLQIPt+PRJ+tYUgNOt8+xbiUEUdy yxS6IVHTr8lu9AU6W/FwiVyg9PEdB1ov6oxIJL/L6fvBzThH1CoLKobfdQbkfJdAhlRP 6gLw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=zSyQo8mfwoR8QHjfxREaZk4mB8tSlTRYiXougbsi/DQ=; b=JRjZIiQ5kfEtPkrMy50Qiu0xi5qRsNQZxNvykxmOxXzQ42A0fDsN2eND+MQJkYXK4a pFJ7ziohPZvWta1gCFYQCm8PhiaTRboBfmiu54Q0vpt3qhsH5LvAW+LcHtzseo49NxXn BYhIgUKyt0K3PbENLH8dL4TPx5ZbKVrjg0jMHmViO/2qlmPqmcuJ5CY/Rbvai2jQvXJQ u2bKIF8Wq1Cy6Uv7St98i5J0UXC9WZ8ScP8O4KwpNPMmnwZdzUMF0AGsYiM1m6BY3ZeH FfR5fbnyQMv2diagqhidioLgVsPdHv70rZi0UdRCgLrG3RHXZDN90BVVtSrQH0JHa1Rn y9BA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ABuFfoiFwUfqnJC/HKwRDO8O44hQM/AppNM2CW3cvmptO4m4Y1qOL1eS A9DpXAPMzRRObq277qwZQBo=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACcGV63SIcEcmplQ9nEoiay41Qee7gSFMAlFRnX9hWXwvmvNoSftv9Z/z1ep52ntdcQD7bV57zeL7w==
X-Received: by 2002:a63:ad44:: with SMTP id y4-v6mr3332507pgo.138.1538609900174; Wed, 03 Oct 2018 16:38:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.52.174.170] ([66.170.99.1]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l85-v6sm7161551pfk.34.2018.10.03.16.38.19 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 03 Oct 2018 16:38:19 -0700 (PDT)
From: Mahesh Jethanandani <mjethanandani@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <EAE2FE54-C63D-491A-B022-B8978E26521D@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_E342CB6F-49B3-4A36-B3B2-20F3BB8CB105"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2018 16:38:18 -0700
In-Reply-To: <AD038D55-D011-4569-AA79-555AC9B2D766@cisco.com>
Cc: tom petch <ietfc@btconnect.com>, "netmod@ietf.org" <netmod@ietf.org>, YANG Doctors <yang-doctors@ietf.org>
To: Reshad Rehman <rrahman@cisco.com>
References: <AD038D55-D011-4569-AA79-555AC9B2D766@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/Ci2-ldjmjz-nwvoWqftgyoq1EIU>
Subject: Re: [netmod] [yang-doctors] Quirky YANG
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2018 23:38:23 -0000


> On Oct 3, 2018, at 2:41 PM, Reshad Rahman (rrahman) <rrahman@cisco.com> wrote:
> 
> Are YD reviews optional for IETF YANG modules? I assumed it was mandatory.

Here is what it says on the YD page:

All YANG documents will be passed by a YANG doctor reviewer before they will be approved by the IESG. The YANG doctor review must be done after the Working Group Last Call and before the IETF Last Call. ADs and WG chairs responsible on I-Ds that include YANG documents should ask the OPS ADs for a review as soon as the document completed WGLC. Failing that request, the review will be conducted during the IETF Last Call.

Mahesh Jethanandani
mjethanandani@gmail.com