IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [netmod] Alia Atlas' Yes on draft-ietf-netmod-yang-model-classification-07: (with COMMENT)

Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com> Wed, 07 June 2017 12:56 UTC

Return-Path: <bclaise@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94745127868; Wed, 7 Jun 2017 05:56:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.521
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.521 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Xk-cyTsepXp1; Wed, 7 Jun 2017 05:56:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aer-iport-1.cisco.com (aer-iport-1.cisco.com [173.38.203.51]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C0091129464; Wed, 7 Jun 2017 05:56:22 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=5262; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1496840183; x=1498049783; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=fj1kxBwAZtcnNgM+v4gPBglKgvn7zzpOgmHxisqOWL8=; b=l/tMEXde4ZOpEEcE7Fukb4sI3H9Lx/YUv5gl+T7hUS54Ocuc9LO0OTYz VLgpQUNjSQeS9D+iDi3Pyr/GGzGA1Jg+WilvkFIrCiokAr1XipRAb7MTr hkcJlRb5SXYh4vq1Eyg/Yk9IrsNREqhmvgI6Mpv0XsJuFb8B7hUkCFyBq k=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0DRAAC/9jdZ/xbLJq1eGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBBwEBAQEBhDqBDYNzihhzkHWIKogdhTmCEC6FdgKDLxgBAgEBAQEBAQFrKIUZAQUjVhALDgonAwICISURBgEMBgIBAYoPAxUQrlCCJiuHEw2EMgEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBARgFhmGCC4J1gliBYxIBgy6CYQWJTZQxO4cmhzWEXYIGhT6DS4Zxi0JoiD0fOH8LMCEIGxWFFG6BTj42AYchgjABAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.39,311,1493683200"; d="scan'208,217";a="694975024"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-2.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 07 Jun 2017 12:56:18 +0000
Received: from [10.55.221.37] (ams-bclaise-nitro4.cisco.com [10.55.221.37]) by aer-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v57CuI1e015893; Wed, 7 Jun 2017 12:56:18 GMT
To: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>, Alia Atlas <akatlas@gmail.com>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, netmod-chairs@ietf.org, lberger@labn.net, draft-ietf-netmod-yang-model-classification@ietf.org, netmod@ietf.org
References: <149677744855.4002.15427399247421427034.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CABcZeBOupE+fh24iDJ2948r7ikqVKF4PEnNP9gtLx-+saSoCuA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <3ff323af-2b76-4e94-2d8e-09f9970cf884@cisco.com>
Date: Wed, 07 Jun 2017 14:56:15 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.1.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CABcZeBOupE+fh24iDJ2948r7ikqVKF4PEnNP9gtLx-+saSoCuA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------E893C74F29A39C1067177636"
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/CimumEKkyuHLpf6FsO2a8wIx8BQ>
Subject: Re: [netmod] Alia Atlas' Yes on draft-ietf-netmod-yang-model-classification-07: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Jun 2017 12:56:26 -0000

On 6/7/2017 5:16 AM, Eric Rescorla wrote:
> Module pedigree seems good. Other alternatives might be "module 
> ownership" or "module origin"
Seeing this now, I agree with "module origin" :-)

Regards, B.
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 9:30 PM, Alia Atlas <akatlas@gmail.com 
> <mailto:akatlas@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     Alia Atlas has entered the following ballot position for
>     draft-ietf-netmod-yang-model-classification-07: Yes
>
>     When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
>     email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut
>     this
>     introductory paragraph, however.)
>
>
>     Please refer to
>     https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
>     <https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html>
>     for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>
>
>     The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
>     https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netmod-yang-model-classification/
>     <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netmod-yang-model-classification/>
>
>
>
>     ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>     COMMENT:
>     ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>     If there is a desire to change from "module types", which I agree
>     is likely to
>     be overused,  an alternate term might be "module pedigree". Thank
>     you for an
>     excellent, clear, and useful document; I remember the confusion
>     that generated
>     this.
>
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email