Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-rfc7277bis-00

"Eric Voit (evoit)" <evoit@cisco.com> Tue, 05 December 2017 17:22 UTC

Return-Path: <evoit@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82EA0127871; Tue, 5 Dec 2017 09:22:19 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.52
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.52 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id K1Wt69U1J13w; Tue, 5 Dec 2017 09:22:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com [173.37.86.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9C8951272E1; Tue, 5 Dec 2017 09:22:17 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1640; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1512494537; x=1513704137; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=AWh7vyXTrGgHwdRQUO6TFG3F7o2nHVBdtFNoOMoWdjo=; b=X+rCRV2ws6qVolgkWwsBfiHZa5lDCBGQaETXw7RMaLbnSYMI4jsuc2rs FOC6WlIFA6hL7/dZ0cz4yu3bPPY2ndXDGiAL05ZYJXa/X60vBbjj3Dm61 ps2uwbcWrjqT3Y0g5gRVBfY2zKHe1gBA6qEr3nbmeGW+Je+7wjAg+JrM+ c=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0DNAAC61CZa/5JdJa1cGQEBAQEBAQEBA?= =?us-ascii?q?QEBAQcBAQEBAYM9Zm4nB44ZjnuBfZcCghUKGAuESU8ChUg/GAEBAQEBAQEBAWs?= =?us-ascii?q?ohSIBAQEBAgEBATg0CwULAgEIDgoeECcLJQIEAQ0FCIoTCBCsA4pcAQEBAQEBA?= =?us-ascii?q?QEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBGAWDSIIKgVaBaYMrg0uHTgWidgKHdI0Ugh+GEYsxij6?= =?us-ascii?q?CQ4kjAhEZAYE5AR85gU1vFTqCKYRVeAGJFIEUAQEB?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.45,364,1508803200"; d="scan'208";a="322595306"
Received: from rcdn-core-10.cisco.com ([173.37.93.146]) by rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 05 Dec 2017 17:22:16 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-011.cisco.com (xch-rtp-011.cisco.com [64.101.220.151]) by rcdn-core-10.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id vB5HMGwc019589 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 5 Dec 2017 17:22:16 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-013.cisco.com (64.101.220.153) by XCH-RTP-011.cisco.com (64.101.220.151) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1320.4; Tue, 5 Dec 2017 12:22:15 -0500
Received: from xch-rtp-013.cisco.com ([64.101.220.153]) by XCH-RTP-013.cisco.com ([64.101.220.153]) with mapi id 15.00.1320.000; Tue, 5 Dec 2017 12:22:15 -0500
From: "Eric Voit (evoit)" <evoit@cisco.com>
To: Kent Watsen <kwatsen@juniper.net>, "netmod@ietf.org" <netmod@ietf.org>, "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
CC: "netmod-chairs@ietf.org" <netmod-chairs@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-rfc7277bis-00
Thread-Index: AQHTaYFiSitRVtWa5kmwd58FDuHquqM1Bb1g
Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2017 17:22:15 +0000
Message-ID: <0841e825090340c1b0f2c09894a40f74@XCH-RTP-013.cisco.com>
References: <D644D448.DCE04%acee@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <D644D448.DCE04%acee@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.86.244.103]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/CnFwkPb89fbX_pjec55XAZeDPpM>
Subject: Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-rfc7277bis-00
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Dec 2017 17:22:19 -0000

I have reviewed the doc as well, and I also support publication.

One thought for future work might be the interplay of this document and some LLDP model.   There are YANG models for LLDP proving very interesting for network management, and any consistency rules/interactions of this with rfc7277bis' "rw neighbor*" objects could prove fairly complex.

Eric

> On 11/28/17, 2:43 PM, "netmod on behalf of Kent Watsen"
> <netmod-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of kwatsen@juniper.net>; wrote:
> 
> >[resending]
> >
> >
> >All,
> >
> >This starts a two-week working group last call on
> >draft-ietf-netmod-rfc7277bis-00.
> >
> >Please recall that this update's intention is to modify the YANG module
> >to be in line with the NMDA guidelines [1].  Reviewing the diff between
> >the two drafts [2] should reveal just this.
> >
> >The working group last call ends on December 12.
> >Please send your comments to the netmod mailing list.
> >
> >Positive comments, e.g., "I've reviewed this document and believe it is
> >ready for publication", are welcome!
> >This is useful and important, even from authors.
> >
> >[1] https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-dsdt-nmda-guidelines-01
> >[2]
> >https://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-netmod-rfc7277bis-00.txt
> >
> >Thank you,
> >Netmod Chairs
> >
> >
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >netmod mailing list
> >netmod@ietf.org
> >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
> 
> _______________________________________________
> netmod mailing list
> netmod@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod