Re: [netmod] 6991bis: domain-name

William Lupton <wlupton@broadband-forum.org> Wed, 24 July 2019 09:18 UTC

Return-Path: <wlupton@broadband-forum.org>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6351F120132 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Jul 2019 02:18:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=broadband-forum-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qTwJvY6tl6UB for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Jul 2019 02:18:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io1-xd42.google.com (mail-io1-xd42.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d42]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0BB4012012E for <netmod@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Jul 2019 02:18:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io1-xd42.google.com with SMTP id e20so57708348iob.9 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Jul 2019 02:18:47 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=broadband-forum-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=j6OQ36Dacf7TpV1r9ItBmeUFZS4HyUBVa9yYXy9rDIY=; b=WS6SjIGZdf+ariIG8V/+3nKAi0mO+fR0XtBvJGGLEo9FipI41OhV6sLdjQCUpbimvR zujlkC8c5Sk87osgJi+eVcUjsQfp6oeh7iO22P65NkGLX35TK60DJK1FcO/OCIDTtdhL gOyXUG2oRI8IKkXmf7DjhgXdowjPp7gZUTH1pkFLP7M5EXzW9twzlaPDkuX9OaltL3QL v5luiX8yA2PA9e2YG9sIKhqs1P16TR0QqmWkPB6ClCdwG2xXcw/Qm48vzY0HxSmDBDT2 R1CXIVlTqh18DkgVJr7IwTO0quiF77Z2aPO+G0cA4rrbeN4khMLHjuvRf25o/zm2r6Im 4opw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=j6OQ36Dacf7TpV1r9ItBmeUFZS4HyUBVa9yYXy9rDIY=; b=Y8MQmh42z1sCzMO7DLoG6vsfMswo7MR75Ly2yv1VPtQOhyFZTJe7AqFYrayJKWkaBy SS4+yR/hEBwpZCEEJ1OJ2pGmv9+IoB49BhBfcMSovIXz4hmGO3QjrJyCv4xTmpac52z8 9zMg0dBuAvLxQp8LfRmzL5b/3xlMn/6IEveBsn3svZzXQMYbXSPADO6BEwVNJjyp1vd3 87EUju3kj4/m+0tCzB88pM2D0ItofPEk0cDflS1Syb6ykY3hzHp5YYuYw6cQoe5iPeQy aSy+/e19EQc1TjT1oiH3TczYk1895a+pukmcm6rT6XR1D877GBHRHjWjUN4Kf1oVa+Lu Xwew==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWbjxDM1UGHzjydIMckVt3ivz437xs1RLGs2NIhi7bavJhfqbDN Lug/3dmJJhU0BJPGFuMuzOXDQmf4BsN0ZmbrlwnDAZlu1JtjUg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzsRhck/eKDC7pwJJGM78JJSeVm7diNsjuUOjEfWynouzhws8D4X90Y+UV+ofgpGA5xVCQWqy738qfspSIkJ6k=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6602:22cc:: with SMTP id e12mr11852254ioe.192.1563959925817; Wed, 24 Jul 2019 02:18:45 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <b2aa592e7c78f54c75daa5af39a6c364a44a2c5a.camel@nic.cz> <20190721203047.oufc3bcwnjsczhmk@anna.jacobs.jacobs-university.de> <87muh53i2i.fsf@nic.cz> <20190722220755.omgpt4jebqbosals@anna.jacobs.jacobs-university.de> <dd8fdbf917a33ca5eb8bb403eadcc8437a00192f.camel@nic.cz> <20190724070057.i7bmdeuzqu32gozi@anna.jacobs.jacobs-university.de>
In-Reply-To: <20190724070057.i7bmdeuzqu32gozi@anna.jacobs.jacobs-university.de>
From: William Lupton <wlupton@broadband-forum.org>
Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2019 10:18:32 +0100
Message-ID: <CAEe_xxi9gdS+UH=v4LLU2K+VemFDjLfpQw_=t3TC1j1=CFfctQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: NetMod WG <netmod@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000d254bc058e69cbd0"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/D37GLe1F5P1JyjYhpqdps7RzUjg>
Subject: Re: [netmod] 6991bis: domain-name
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2019 09:18:49 -0000

I think that "or" is slightly better here:

"...does not support wildcards (see RFC 4592) *or* classless in-addr.arpa
delegations (see RFC 2317)"

On Wed, 24 Jul 2019 at 08:01, Juergen Schoenwaelder <
j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de> wrote:

> On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 06:41:42PM -0400, Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
> >
> > But these two unsupported cases only make sense in the context of DNS
> zone data.
> > I would suggest instead
> >
> > NEW:
> >
> >         "The domain-name type represents a DNS domain name.  The
> >          name SHOULD be fully qualified whenever possible.
> >          This type is not intended for modeling DNS zone data, as
> >          it does not support wildcards [RFC 4592] and classless
> >          in-addr.arpa delegations [RFC 2317]."
> >
>
> Yes, this is better. I will put the following in the next revision:
>
>      "The domain-name type represents a DNS domain name.  The
>       name SHOULD be fully qualified whenever possible. This
>       type does not support wildcards (see RFC 4592) and
>       classless in-addr.arpa delegations (see RFC 2317).
>
> And I will remove the sentence you wanted to remove since the above
> more clearly explains when to use / not to use this type.
>
> /js
>
> --
> Juergen Schoenwaelder           Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH
> Phone: +49 421 200 3587         Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany
> Fax:   +49 421 200 3103         <https://www.jacobs-university.de/>
>
> _______________________________________________
> netmod mailing list
> netmod@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
>