Re: [netmod] [Errata Held for Document Update] RFC8407 (6899)

Andy Bierman <andy@yumaworks.com> Thu, 31 March 2022 17:11 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20220330212032.B1C784C1D2@rfcpa.amsl.com> <0100017fdcedaf32-a7793fc0-367f-4737-a505-6045ecfc74ed-000000@email.amazonses.com> <25000_1648704694_62453CB6_25000_113_1_315eaf0b15d04ffea9a7f1f5a7b07324@orange.com> <AM7PR07MB62483BF8820925D14E7609C3A0E19@AM7PR07MB6248.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <f3673d5b-73d3-3274-f9bf-35f2f9646940@iecc.com>
In-Reply-To: <f3673d5b-73d3-3274-f9bf-35f2f9646940@iecc.com>
From: Andy Bierman <andy@yumaworks.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2022 10:11:20 -0700
Message-ID: <CABCOCHSKXKjuBpytANO2WP9-mmJZ=Swtzz0M+0bKJvRBBZ1+ew@mail.gmail.com>
To: "John R. Levine" <johnl@iecc.com>
Cc: tom petch <ietfc@btconnect.com>, "mohamed.boucadair@orange.com" <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>, Kent Watsen <kent@watsen.net>, "rfc-ed@rfc-editor.org" <rfc-ed@rfc-editor.org>, "netmod@ietf.org" <netmod@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000d5ab2805db86c0cc"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/E5OptCh_W6Pm7vsyE0ZdNz7Vvew>
Subject: Re: [netmod] [Errata Held for Document Update] RFC8407 (6899)
Precedence: list

On Thu, Mar 31, 2022 at 9:56 AM John R. Levine <johnl@iecc.com> wrote:

> > There are not thousands of RFCs that include a "Module Review Checklist"
> :-), which is the purpose of this erratum. Thanks.
> >
> > <tp>
> >
> > I agree.  There may be lots of RFC in error because RFC8407 gets it
> wrong but if the update to the lots of RFC was wanted then it should have
> been investigated last Autumn when the announcement of the change to the
> TLP was made, an announcement that passed me by despite being on all the
> right mailing lists.
>
> The fix to the TLP was my idea in the first place and it's not that big of
> a deal.  If you follow the link and read that part of the TLP, the actual
> license has never changed.  We just give it the correct name now.
>
>
I agree the checklist in Appendix A should be updated.

The corrected RFC (any RFC where Errata Exists) should be available online.
Not erasing the published RFC, but with a link to rfcNNNN-current (where
all accepted Errata is applied).



> Regards,
> John Levine, johnl@taugh.com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for
> Dummies",
> Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly
>
>

Andy


> _______________________________________________
> netmod mailing list
> netmod@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
>

[netmod] [Errata Held for Document Update] RFC840… RFC Errata System
Re: [netmod] [Errata Held for Document Update] RF… Kent Watsen
Re: [netmod] [Errata Held for Document Update] RF… Sandy Ginoza
Re: [netmod] [Errata Held for Document Update] RF… mohamed.boucadair
Re: [netmod] [Errata Held for Document Update] RF… tom petch
Re: [netmod] [Errata Held for Document Update] RF… John R. Levine
Re: [netmod] [Errata Held for Document Update] RF… Andy Bierman
Re: [netmod] [Errata Held for Document Update] RF… Kent Watsen
Re: [netmod] [Errata Held for Document Update] RF… John R. Levine
Re: [netmod] [Errata Held for Document Update] RF… Kent Watsen
Re: [netmod] [Errata Held for Document Update] RF… Jean Mahoney
Re: [netmod] [Errata Held for Document Update] RF… mohamed.boucadair
Re: [netmod] [Errata Held for Document Update] RF… John R. Levine
Re: [netmod] [Errata Held for Document Update] RF… Andy Bierman