Re: [netmod] MD5 in ianach ex-RFC7317

Kent Watsen <kent@watsen.net> Wed, 10 February 2021 16:15 UTC

Return-Path: <010001778cb9cf93-5e68e4c3-f85a-4d3c-931c-1913aec9de85-000000@amazonses.watsen.net>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9C4B3A0E8E for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Feb 2021 08:15:26 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.917
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.917 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=amazonses.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RKv-x3Gvd1CH for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Feb 2021 08:15:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from a48-93.smtp-out.amazonses.com (a48-93.smtp-out.amazonses.com [54.240.48.93]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1B42F3A0ED7 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Feb 2021 08:15:24 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/simple; s=224i4yxa5dv7c2xz3womw6peuasteono; d=amazonses.com; t=1612973723; h=From:Message-Id:Content-Type:Mime-Version:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:Cc:To:References:Feedback-ID; bh=xrerRBE4hVqCzyiikVdMaUnqTg68TIBDomg8Eox4rDA=; b=J67OolSbMxpOYdfvotR+t0JabYpvB6DcQ/dSpj/VkvvM4qqRFGss8UVABFoNABO1 ZwzJ+lCKvA01ynNSbglDL5XTt3FbUDyR5zQXeA3IqdqsuBlz+DFXMdap8P8+2dKMotG OhX2YHbs52Y+ItAFtsuiSlDK5s9qAdE8LiFgTCSM=
From: Kent Watsen <kent@watsen.net>
Message-ID: <010001778cb9cf93-5e68e4c3-f85a-4d3c-931c-1913aec9de85-000000@email.amazonses.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_A962BB38-6998-4497-B975-8903F9AE49A1"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.80.23.2.2\))
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2021 16:15:23 +0000
In-Reply-To: <AM7PR07MB624899B3F2A08E786D505C4FA08D9@AM7PR07MB6248.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
Cc: Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>, "netmod@ietf.org" <netmod@ietf.org>
To: tom petch <ietfc@btconnect.com>
References: <AM7PR07MB624833298D6872811059D186A08E9@AM7PR07MB6248.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <0100017787c260d9-55bdd1ae-c12b-4cb6-87b4-94e95951fe36-000000@email.amazonses.com> <AM7PR07MB6248AFD0CC1FB88329BF8C46A08E9@AM7PR07MB6248.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <0100017787e7c265-3993cc0c-a9c5-4072-b4bc-abba6fb7f7db-000000@email.amazonses.com> <20210209191054.j4ggkl3lvt5c566o@anna.jacobs.jacobs-university.de> <AM7PR07MB624899B3F2A08E786D505C4FA08D9@AM7PR07MB6248.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.80.23.2.2)
X-SES-Outgoing: 2021.02.10-54.240.48.93
Feedback-ID: 1.us-east-1.DKmIRZFhhsBhtmFMNikgwZUWVrODEw9qVcPhqJEI2DA=:AmazonSES
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/EjVMgmIazXLbprMMqA7Rg2AdDCc>
Subject: Re: [netmod] MD5 in ianach ex-RFC7317
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2021 16:15:27 -0000

> 
> The more interesting bit is what IANA has to say about this registry:
> 
> iana-crypt-hash YANG Module     RFC 7317
>                                Expert Review (Expert: Unassigned)
> 
> Perhaps we should focus more on finding a volunteer willing to take
> the role of the Designated Expert...

I'm aware that IESG made a designation in 2019, but it's not reflected here.  It appears to be just that IANA didn’t update the page, so I pinged them about that.

> 
> <tp>
> That is several steps ahead of us and, as and when it arises, that is the job of the IESG, not us. 
> 
> The first task, for us or for the NTP WG (who want it to happen) or ... is to reach a consensus on whether or not the module is fit for purpose, or whether it needs updating.

This?
 
NEW:

     feature crypt-hash-md5 {
       status deprecated;
       description
         "Indicates that the device supports the MD5
          hash function in 'crypt-hash' values.";
       reference "RFC 1321: The MD5 Message-Digest Algorithm";
     }

And also:

     revision 2021-MM-DD {
       description
         “Deprecated the 'crypt-hash-md5’ feature.";
       reference
         "RFC 7317: A YANG Data Model for System Management";
     }

And publish the result as iana-crypt-hash@2021-MM-DD.yang

Works for me.

Kent