Re: [netmod] IPR Poll on draft-ietf-netmod-yang-semver-09

Kent Watsen <kent+ietf@watsen.net> Mon, 30 January 2023 23:34 UTC

Return-Path: <010001860508048d-9f84741a-fbd1-4917-b92d-cb0fadcc6a91-000000@amazonses.watsen.net>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10499C1B18B4 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Jan 2023 15:34:20 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=amazonses.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id L8sOmBS2aAuk for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Jan 2023 15:34:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from a8-83.smtp-out.amazonses.com (a8-83.smtp-out.amazonses.com [54.240.8.83]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2B1BEC1B18B3 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Jan 2023 15:34:18 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/simple; s=6gbrjpgwjskckoa6a5zn6fwqkn67xbtw; d=amazonses.com; t=1675121657; h=From:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Mime-Version:Subject:Date:References:To:In-Reply-To:Message-Id:Feedback-ID; bh=42RGI2lqe65j5ZvkXyExc7QOw0bYHfILdbxILbiMYsw=; b=ljmPhP/1ImM0+AOMYIUo9uKEVa8pQ/BXdTiZyO1YUlVGTQJqcEwrzcBoiS8AI7p7 KedlarFvA4RRZNWTmod5XrI3mnSxNap1OOh3gi8dxh2OutBaM+MQmntrPPpFW1KQ2pX Z0Fvx48NWvhz1Ix7UW+3trQXwOzdrZlEjH2dLH4A=
From: Kent Watsen <kent+ietf@watsen.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3731.400.51.1.1\))
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2023 23:34:17 +0000
References: <01000185bccf699d-b0c8923f-77a9-4b2d-ae8d-ecca256ab6f7-000000@email.amazonses.com>
To: "netmod@ietf.org" <netmod@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <01000185bccf699d-b0c8923f-77a9-4b2d-ae8d-ecca256ab6f7-000000@email.amazonses.com>
Message-ID: <010001860508048d-9f84741a-fbd1-4917-b92d-cb0fadcc6a91-000000@email.amazonses.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3731.400.51.1.1)
Feedback-ID: 1.us-east-1.DKmIRZFhhsBhtmFMNikgwZUWVrODEw9qVcPhqJEI2DA=:AmazonSES
X-SES-Outgoing: 2023.01.30-54.240.8.83
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/EsotpB6exuzbJHCSdJVWvmFfO-A>
Subject: Re: [netmod] IPR Poll on draft-ietf-netmod-yang-semver-09
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2023 23:34:20 -0000

Thank you all!   Everyone replied:

	"No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft".

We'll move to WGLC as soon as the IPR call on "yang-module-versioning" completes.

Kent


> On Jan 16, 2023, at 5:59 PM, Kent Watsen <kent+ietf@watsen.net> wrote:
> 
> [NOTE: A response is needed from all listed in this message's "To" line, the authors and contributors listed in the draft]
> 
> 
> Authors, Contributors, WG,
> 
> In preparation for a WGLC Call:
> 
> 	Are you aware of any IPR that applies to drafts identified above?
> 
> Please state either:
> 
> 	"No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"
> or
> 	"Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft"
> 
> If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
> (see RFCs 3669, 5378 and 8179 for more details)?
> 
> If yes to the above, please state either:
> 
> 	"Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules"
> or
> 	"No, the IPR has not been disclosed"
> 
> If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think
> appropriate. If you are listed as a document author or contributor
> please answer the above by responding to this email regardless
> of whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. This 
> document will not advance to the next stage until a response
> has been received from each author.
> 
> If you are on the WG email list or attend WG meetings but are not
> listed as an author or contributor, we remind you of your obligations
> under the IETF IPR rules which encourages you to notify the IETF 
> if you are aware of IPR of others on an IETF contribution, or to
> refrain from participating in any contribution or discussion related
> to your undisclosed IPR. For more information, please see the RFCs
> listed above and
> http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/IntellectualProperty.
> 
> Thank you,
> Kent and Lou
> 
> PS Please include all listed in the headers of this message in your
> response.
> _______________________________________________
> netmod mailing list
> netmod@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod