IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [netmod] upcoming adoptions

Robert Wilton <rwilton@cisco.com> Thu, 14 September 2017 13:37 UTC

Return-Path: <rwilton@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22FED132D49 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 Sep 2017 06:37:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.501
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.501 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id K0_RiqKKaIKe for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 Sep 2017 06:37:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aer-iport-1.cisco.com (aer-iport-1.cisco.com [173.38.203.51]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 345E31321CB for <netmod@ietf.org>; Thu, 14 Sep 2017 06:37:49 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1094; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1505396269; x=1506605869; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:mime-version: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=tzn0WQKDZlhR4EumOSbcv9kLk5SGtkeCgmllIhewiwo=; b=JThwvdWxAl8Q0ULcawc8M0m4um+9sjfOYWkbP1v98y8iJNe40f//1I8M KXj3VMA86bBnd4txSkKFhrixgsGsthM7PWHvOMnq1wmI+T3qQo6PHNy/d 6U0yetXuilpBdhNS2wP7oQIPnIDlm6z8CKHvJ2ZUjped5n8QnsCjEw58g s=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0CQAQCDhbpZ/xbLJq1dGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBBwEBAQEBhD5uJ4N3ixSQRwkimDoKGAuESk8ChGcUAQIBAQEBAQEBayiFGQEBAQMBASEPAQU2GwsOCgICJgICJzAGAQwGAgEBii4QrAWCJ4s0AQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBARoFgQ6CHYNSgWMrC4JyiAuCYAWhAodajHiCE4Vog1qHIY1ch1WBOTYhgQ0yIQgcFUqHHT82iG0BAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.42,393,1500940800"; d="scan'208";a="697186385"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-1.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 14 Sep 2017 13:37:45 +0000
Received: from [10.63.23.66] (dhcp-ensft1-uk-vla370-10-63-23-66.cisco.com [10.63.23.66]) by aer-core-1.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v8EDbiTZ013741; Thu, 14 Sep 2017 13:37:45 GMT
To: Kent Watsen <kwatsen@juniper.net>, "netmod@ietf.org" <netmod@ietf.org>, Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
References: <14299503-509D-43BE-A938-0B7B88C3B249@juniper.net>
From: Robert Wilton <rwilton@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <36ba3d4b-1ae1-0666-12cf-db41e172924b@cisco.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2017 14:37:44 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <14299503-509D-43BE-A938-0B7B88C3B249@juniper.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/FFi10xBbvKmTQY0-Vhgt73ZXWSA>
Subject: Re: [netmod] upcoming adoptions
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2017 13:37:51 -0000

Hi Kent & Lou,

When do you think that it will be possible to start the adoption process 
on these drafts?

I think that the first two at least would seem to be ready for 
adoption.  For the 3rd draft, there still seems to be an open question 
of what to do with the old state tree, but presumably that could be 
solved after the draft has been adopted?

Thanks,
Rob


On 30/08/2017 00:46, Kent Watsen wrote:
> Hey folks,
>
> As discussed at the last meeting, we are heading to revising existing RFCs to align them with NMDA.  The first batch have been published as individual drafts:
>
> 1. https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bjorklund-netmod-rfc7223bis-00
> 2. https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bjorklund-netmod-rfc7277bis-00
> 3. https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-acee-netmod-rfc8022bis-00
>
> Please take a look (comments welcome!) and stay tuned for the related adoption calls.
>
> Thanks,
> Kent (and Lou)
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> netmod mailing list
> netmod@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
> .
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email