Re: [netmod] Rtgdir telechat review of draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8022bis-08.txt

"Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com> Wed, 17 January 2018 16:03 UTC

Return-Path: <acee@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFDBA131494; Wed, 17 Jan 2018 08:03:20 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.53
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.53 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HM3fHkpgAJBt; Wed, 17 Jan 2018 08:03:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alln-iport-3.cisco.com (alln-iport-3.cisco.com [173.37.142.90]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8E58113148E; Wed, 17 Jan 2018 08:02:48 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2332; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1516204968; x=1517414568; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=EU0ZF/ijgOg2EsP/0LnuvAfzO9LT2etzMUxoe1p8Y+Q=; b=U4i6reEU1sEao3UTq4RgiM0sK7+sI4tlXfjiEDv2QPa4RYDO0bPQ5Tr9 kYF8Br3aFBp0tz5XaoyboerJ2Wgs5GU0M2z9DX7OoO4kZnWSNq0Jfh/Mv MA1Znfo5d6+BkNeaho04wajHvTGxDlL5cQmKdf7e6HPadTOwZoTtazQvA U=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0DeAADGcl9a/5NdJa1bGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQcBAQEBAYNBZnQnB4QMiiSOXoICly6CFgojhRgCGoRKPxgBAQEBAQEBAQFrKIUkBiMRRRACAQgUBgImAgICMBUQAQEEAQ0FijMQpT2CJ4lNAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBHYEPhUKDQIMugyQLAgKFBoJlAQSjbAKIDI1FghlnhTaLXY1DiT8CERkBgTsBHzmBUG8VgmcJhE54AYsEgRcBAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.46,372,1511827200"; d="scan'208";a="57993162"
Received: from rcdn-core-11.cisco.com ([173.37.93.147]) by alln-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 17 Jan 2018 16:02:47 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-011.cisco.com (xch-rtp-011.cisco.com [64.101.220.151]) by rcdn-core-11.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id w0HG2lPP031819 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 17 Jan 2018 16:02:47 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com (64.101.220.155) by XCH-RTP-011.cisco.com (64.101.220.151) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1320.4; Wed, 17 Jan 2018 11:02:46 -0500
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) by XCH-RTP-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) with mapi id 15.00.1320.000; Wed, 17 Jan 2018 11:02:46 -0500
From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
To: "Hejia (Jia)" <hejia@huawei.com>, "rtg-ads@ietf.org" <rtg-ads@ietf.org>
CC: "rtg-dir@ietf.org" <rtg-dir@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8022bis.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8022bis.all@ietf.org>, "netmod@ietf.org" <netmod@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Rtgdir telechat review of draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8022bis-08.txt
Thread-Index: AdOPXq3GoHXlPWDwRv+GyrBCDNGb/QATeQyA
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2018 16:02:46 +0000
Message-ID: <D684DD4C.ECC8B%acee@cisco.com>
References: <735916399E11684EAF4EB4FB376B719553034791@DGGEMA503-MBX.china.huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <735916399E11684EAF4EB4FB376B719553034791@DGGEMA503-MBX.china.huawei.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.116.152.198]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <822982CFE4292444A9748B8B801ED6BB@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/FLxhW8-O6ydSpxDX_xibKdKtiyQ>
Subject: Re: [netmod] Rtgdir telechat review of draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8022bis-08.txt
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2018 16:03:21 -0000

Hi Jia, 

Thanks for your review. The Appendix D nit has been fixed in the -09
version  (the only change).

Thanks,
Acee

On 1/17/18, 1:50 AM, "Hejia (Jia)" <hejia@huawei.com> wrote:

>Hello,
>
>I have been selected as the Routing Directorate reviewer for this draft.
>The Routing Directorate seeks to review all routing or routing-related
>drafts as they pass through IETF last call and IESG review, and sometimes
>on special request. The purpose of the review is to provide assistance to
>the Routing ADs. For more information about the Routing Directorate,
>please see http://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/rtg/trac/wiki/RtgDir
>
>Although these comments are primarily for the use of the Routing ADs, it
>would be helpful if you could consider them along with any other IETF
>Last Call comments that you receive, and strive to resolve them through
>discussion or by updating the draft.
>
>Document draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8022bis-08.txt
>Reviewer: Jia He 
>Review Date: 17 January 2018
>IETF LC End Date: 15 January 2018
>Telechat date: 25 January 2018
>Intended Status: Standards Track
>
>Summary
>This document provides an NMDA-compliant version of YANG data model for
>routing management. It is very well written and ready for publication.
>But I happened to see a small nit in Appendix D just before I finished my
>review, see below.
>
>Comments
>None.
>
>Major Issues:
>No major issues found.
>
>Minor Issues:
>No minor issues found.
>
>Nits:
>In Appendix D, the namespace of "ietf-ipv6-unicast-routing" is written as
>"urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-ipv6-unicast-routing-3". "-3" is not
>meaningful and needs to be deleted.
>
>
>
>Regards,
>Jia