Re: [netmod] Regarding IPR on draft-wwx-netmod-event-yang-10

[Lou Berger <[e-mail]>]

Hi Qin,

It's sub-optimal, but sufficient IMO.  Please note you didn't respond 
for yourself!

we're still missing responses from:

Qin Wu
Benoit Claise
Andy Bierman

Thanks,

Lou

On 12/7/2020 8:46 PM, Qin Wu wrote:
>
> Hi, Lou:
>
> Does forwarding confirmation from the authors to the list count?
>
> I have done this accidentally. If not, I will leave this to my coauthors.
>
> -Qin
>
> *发件人:*Lou Berger [mailto:[e-mail]]
> *发送时间:*2020年12月8日6:20
> *收件人:*Qin Wu <[e-mail]>; Igor Bryskin <[e-mail]>; 
> Henk Birkholz <[e-mail]>; Xufeng Liu 
> <[e-mail]>; Benoit Claise <[e-mail]>
> *抄送:*NetMod WG Chairs <[e-mail]>; NetMod WG 
> <[e-mail]>
> *主题:*Fwd: Regarding IPR on draft-wwx-netmod-event-yang-10
>
> Authors,
>
>     My apologies -- I failed to cc the WG on this.  Can you please 
> re-reply so that your response make it into the WG archive.
>
> Thank you!
>
> Lou
>
>
> -------- Forwarded Message --------
>
> *Subject: *
>
> 	
>
> Regarding IPR on draft-wwx-netmod-event-yang-10
>
> *Date: *
>
> 	
>
> Mon, 23 Nov 2020 18:08:59 -0500
>
> *From: *
>
> 	
>
> Lou Berger <[e-mail]> <mailto:[e-mail]>
>
> *To: *
>
> 	
>
> Qin Wu <[e-mail]> <mailto:[e-mail]>, Igor Bryskin 
> <[e-mail]> <mailto:[e-mail]>, Henk Birkholz 
> <[e-mail]> 
> <mailto:[e-mail]>, Xufeng Liu 
> <[e-mail]> <mailto:[e-mail]>, Benoit 
> Claise <[e-mail]> <mailto:[e-mail]>
>
> *CC: *
>
> 	
>
> NetMod WG Chairs <[e-mail]> <mailto:[e-mail]>
>
>
>
> Authors,
>
> Per the 109 session, it is the chairs intent to do another adoption 
> call on this draft. In preparation for that, we’ve determined both 
> that the draft has changed significantly and that there is a new 
> author, and therefore feel it necessary to issue another IPR call, as 
> follows:
>
>
> Authors, Contributors, WG,
>
> As part of preparation for WG Adoption:
>
> Are you aware of any IPR that applies to drafts identified above?
>
> Please state either:
>
> "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"
> or
> "Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft"
>
> If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
> (see RFCs 3669, 5378 and 8179 for more details)?
>
> If yes to the above, please state either:
>
> "Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules"
> or
> "No, the IPR has not been disclosed"
>
> If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think
> appropriate.
>
> We note that all DT members are listed as contributors. If you
> contributed to the document please respond. Alternatively, please feel
> free to state that you didn't materially contribute to the draft and
> would like your name removed from the contribution section (and moved to
> acknowledgments after WG adoption).
>
> If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer the
> above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are
> aware of any relevant IPR. This document will not advance to the next
> stage until a response has been received from each author.
>
> NOTE: THIS APPLIES TO ALL OF YOU LISTED IN THIS MESSAGE'S TO LINES.
>
> If you are on the WG email list or attend WG meetings but are not listed
> as an author or contributor, we remind you of your obligations under
> the IETF IPR rules which encourages you to notify the IETF if you are
> aware of IPR of others on an IETF contribution, or to refrain from
> participating in any contribution or discussion related to your
> undisclosed IPR. For more information, please see the RFCs listed above
> and
> http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/IntellectualProperty 
> <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/IntellectualProperty>.
>
> Thank you,
> NETMOD WG Chairs
>
> PS Please include all listed in the headers of this message in your
> response.
>