Re: [netmod] rfc6991bis: yang:longitude, yang:latitude, yang:postal-code, yang:country-code

[Qin Wu <[e-mail]>]

Works for me, thanks.
-----邮件原件-----
发件人: Juergen Schoenwaelder [mailto:[e-mail]] 
发送时间: 2020年7月30日 22:03
收件人: Qin Wu <[e-mail]>
抄送: [e-mail]
主题: Re: [netmod] rfc6991bis: yang:longitude, yang:latitude, yang:postal-code, yang:country-code

But then perhaps draft-ietf-netmod-geo-location-05 needs to be updated or you need to use a grouping. I think we should not have overlapping work in different documents.

/js

On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 01:54:43PM +0000, Qin Wu wrote:
> That is a good option, but draft-ietf-netmod-geo-location-05 only define grouping, there is typedef for longitude and latitude, altitude. 
> 
> -Qin
> -----邮件原件-----
> 发件人: Juergen Schoenwaelder 
> [mailto:[e-mail]]
> 发送时间: 2020年7月30日 21:32
> 收件人: Qin Wu <[e-mail]>
> 抄送: [e-mail]
> 主题: Re: [netmod] rfc6991bis: yang:longitude, yang:latitude, 
> yang:postal-code, yang:country-code
> 
> But there is draft-ietf-netmod-geo-location-05... What about using the types defined in there?
> 
> /js
> 
> On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 01:28:17PM +0000, Qin Wu wrote:
> > See geolocation definition in draft-ietf-teas-yang-te-topo-22 which defines longitude and latitude, altitude.
> > I know it is beneficial for future document to import these types from rfc6991bis instead of from te topo model.
> > 
> > -Qin
> > -----邮件原件-----
> > 发件人: netmod [mailto:[e-mail]] 代表 Juergen 
> > Schoenwaelder
> > 发送时间: 2020年7月18日 3:16
> > 收件人: [e-mail]
> > 主题: [netmod] rfc6991bis: yang:longitude, yang:latitude, 
> > yang:postal-code, yang:country-code
> > 
> >   - It was suggested to add types for longitude, latitude, postal
> >     code, country-code. Do we go there or do we leave these for other
> >     modules to define? It seems such definitions should go into
> >     draft-ietf-netmod-geo-location.
> > 
> >   - Geo location is covered by draft-ietf-netmod-geo-location
> >     (so do nothing).
> > 
> >   - For country codes, there is ISO 3166, which defines two-letter,
> >     three-letter, and numeric country codes. I assume people wanted
> >     two-letter codes (as used in the DNS), i.e. they want DE and not
> >     DEU. But note that it is GB and not UK, i.e., what we commonly
> >     use in the DNS may not be exactly ISO 3166. (The devil is always
> >     in the details.)
> > 
> >   - For postal codes, it is unclear what the requirements are or what
> >     a proper definition for postal codes is. It is not entirely clear
> >     what the authoritative definition of the format of postal codes
> >     is, perhaps the Universal Postal Union.
> > 
> >   - Options: (i) do nothing or (ii) add a country code definition
> >     only or (iii) add both a country code definition and a postal
> >     code definition (which might be to some extend vague)
> > 
> >   - Proposal: do nothing
> >   
> > -- 
> > Juergen Schoenwaelder           Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH
> > Phone: [phone]         Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany
> > Fax:   [phone]         <https://www.jacobs-university.de/>
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > netmod mailing list
> > [e-mail]
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
> 
> -- 
> Juergen Schoenwaelder           Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH
> Phone: [phone]         Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany
> Fax:   [phone]         <https://www.jacobs-university.de/>

-- 
Juergen Schoenwaelder           Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH
Phone: [phone]         Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany
Fax:   [phone]         <https://www.jacobs-university.de/>