Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll for draft-clemm-netmod-nmda-diff-00
Kent Watsen <kwatsen@juniper.net> Tue, 09 October 2018 17:17 UTC
Return-Path: <kwatsen@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 829B913136C for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Oct 2018 10:17:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=juniper.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id l2fHCTpo9pRZ for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Oct 2018 10:17:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0b-00273201.pphosted.com (mx0b-00273201.pphosted.com [67.231.152.164]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8A35E13136B for <netmod@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Oct 2018 10:17:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0108163.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-00273201.pphosted.com (8.16.0.22/8.16.0.22) with SMTP id w99HG4wB004740; Tue, 9 Oct 2018 10:17:13 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=juniper.net; h=from : to : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-id : content-transfer-encoding : mime-version; s=PPS1017; bh=r7oZ9WVnLiJ5953O6bT2CZ6DbtcPaOf7DK+ThMdgqbg=; b=euaXydvOhpWx0ffCF9dda0GYq2Y2/BpKphvWupQfWuubKfz47TsRC59zSWCQIhYuM+tH ZJ0MAM/qQNt/PG1NK26EtpD5eUBDYYjAwDMQFJKmGtYJVU+RFsjXCRnNkZa/iIemOoG5 EOcn/H8ibVmWW747sZn8X2TdlFdpc1XC/BPKo9gR+M8Nlr2S5FocF4AV9Gpcygia5nbK kgS2b+8XwowUcK/R6biqcuSU3VE/GRF4wYR+83rARNt4x9cj0DTNXGi2ueKp7PtOFazH 9lGHEIeBgajRYy12RSXyU/knX0wMcmBZer0hONWhIxxRL0qZobNdz902EDCAwc+oFC62 rw==
Received: from nam03-dm3-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-dm3nam03lp0017.outbound.protection.outlook.com [207.46.163.17]) by mx0b-00273201.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2n0y2ar85p-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 09 Oct 2018 10:17:13 -0700
Received: from BYAPR05MB4664.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (52.135.233.78) by BYAPR05MB5223.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (20.177.231.85) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.1228.20; Tue, 9 Oct 2018 17:17:10 +0000
Received: from BYAPR05MB4664.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::d45d:b92d:3e87:ef9f]) by BYAPR05MB4664.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::d45d:b92d:3e87:ef9f%3]) with mapi id 15.20.1228.020; Tue, 9 Oct 2018 17:17:10 +0000
From: Kent Watsen <kwatsen@juniper.net>
To: Alexander Clemm <alexander.clemm@huawei.com>, Ladislav Lhotka <lhotka@nic.cz>, Andy Bierman <andy@yumaworks.com>, Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>, "netmod@ietf.org" <netmod@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [netmod] WG adoption poll for draft-clemm-netmod-nmda-diff-00
Thread-Index: AQHUWyPz6FAZXxCAuEeMxCal0HeWUaUO37yAgAAnp4CAAARbAIAABz8AgABBFoD//8WNgIAAWzMAgAAFdID//8jaAIABBsKAgAWVBYCAAQ+mgA==
Date: Tue, 09 Oct 2018 17:17:10 +0000
Message-ID: <E522A8A5-F717-43B1-BBE1-922A9690E825@juniper.net>
References: <201810031419.w93EJNpn040188@idle.juniper.net> <20181004.121417.2190375850946168105.mbj@tail-f.com> <69afa537-9a5f-6fb6-de21-2add0ffec4b2@cisco.com> <0aa239221e80e812f920db6ae023eabc6b3ef5ed.camel@nic.cz> <ccc83277-cfa7-f363-1beb-78e801f8b675@cisco.com> <27c125fa83754c5f6723e04243f1efdaf4be8e82.camel@nic.cz> <7E46B2E3-3F12-4E08-8172-823E73E25D50@juniper.net> <20181004190754.fsu5ck5jblw5uuah@anna.jacobs.jacobs-university.de> <CABCOCHTu5ju8Qv548g+mDNioBAAuxRywZknoNO9mbUOY3MaoGw@mail.gmail.com> <8704A29D-EBAB-4AA0-B5A3-3CAC74403360@juniper.net> <87sh1kde7u.fsf@nic.cz> <644DA50AFA8C314EA9BDDAC83BD38A2E0EB6D575@sjceml521-mbx.china.huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <644DA50AFA8C314EA9BDDAC83BD38A2E0EB6D575@sjceml521-mbx.china.huawei.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/10.10.2.180910
x-originating-ip: [66.129.241.10]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; BYAPR05MB5223; 6:4YroWty0a5zctmmRfEYAWSy/U+s8FE94YakDFQE4e0PCdUw7ikdKjAr7XamvArB/B4I5WbYx7OX8HJVxfVMo4prIP/1YZyKtZg0Y3RG6rfY/mf9EsKITD+AwhKXAQFgRLigPvefft8q/r9/SfQj7zabA5hTZgU1JJtbeGnqlZyra6f/yPPQ/INhDWKoxaM6IdIRkSyw4Eq9/jImyxVEQXs/MNJ5QiV0qVlQSzX7xrJR6v9EmAp/on6TEilY2N2/JhZMDp/mpFri1ze2eJY9dVIxh3JxhErAHgTXiWy/ylQHDM8e52qvvFseHCeUUmIe7SwoaHVXB0LO1IwrB/pJnBTmP7fPqGmHGbeECq2nPTgU89ywObJWWGrebB4rzA3WkpnvfE4s31tiTaA+kqwT+caEDz/aBAErNl/wbbj67HybixQF6NajgfnzO7vZmyHQ5RxcMrxBD+Y1fngF3d/5C+w==; 5:ArOTiTNbnRLHKWmPJcg8tc4nhK8AqpJ7KYcUOC0CI7yD4fHLyBaMoFQd+OYv9d8z8Mim9VEl5kKFn1qGNtFeCSBLbfu8YLrL26P8OA3arobQkB5ROpzc4WVAw94gCxzCMNFvZZLJFW3KEQsLSn/qN3vIKl9tzqDkf/LgM7jlMkI=; 7:gKDK6ubqG5mbIgUKNe+z97VQvSzSIL3AlckkPCL1WW6zaBgv3xdIHF/GJ9/6CA1OU80ZrlOJv9qbhjHSZmEs5DbIoPdbxPNwwKFNO5AXuRZ8QwoAB+2/4/5/XoOn1eo5MgqOM6LFcpy3iTzeNcXxVpyUOJs/eAa3lk2ni6B5q0IyQCSnoYQwKjVVDJ766bEE49fwFH8M5RFi2C/37ILeUS0hJqX10E4Ur7Qoi0wWqqEp7ZdkR6hxJLlVgM+pIklt
x-ms-exchange-antispam-srfa-diagnostics: SOS;
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 5c747ad0-82c0-43ef-a5b4-08d62e0b0c30
x-ms-office365-filtering-ht: Tenant
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(7020095)(4652040)(8989299)(4534185)(4627221)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(8990200)(5600074)(711020)(4618075)(2017052603328)(7153060)(7193020); SRVR:BYAPR05MB5223;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: BYAPR05MB5223:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BYAPR05MB5223735D4ED18C242BB8B766A5E70@BYAPR05MB5223.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(158342451672863)(10436049006162)(50582790962513)(138986009662008)(95692535739014);
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(8211001083)(6040522)(2401047)(5005006)(8121501046)(3002001)(10201501046)(3231355)(944501410)(52105095)(93006095)(93001095)(6055026)(149066)(150057)(6041310)(20161123564045)(20161123560045)(201703131423095)(201702281528075)(20161123555045)(201703061421075)(201703061406153)(20161123562045)(20161123558120)(201708071742011)(7699051)(76991055); SRVR:BYAPR05MB5223; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:BYAPR05MB5223;
x-forefront-prvs: 08200063E9
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(39860400002)(136003)(376002)(366004)(396003)(346002)(189003)(199004)(51444003)(13464003)(966005)(97736004)(66066001)(6436002)(5250100002)(2616005)(476003)(7736002)(478600001)(53936002)(36756003)(446003)(102836004)(4744004)(11346002)(2501003)(81156014)(6246003)(86362001)(19627235002)(25786009)(6116002)(71200400001)(99286004)(83716004)(71190400001)(81166006)(58126008)(3846002)(575784001)(229853002)(305945005)(8676002)(256004)(2900100001)(14444005)(105586002)(106356001)(93886005)(6512007)(76176011)(316002)(33656002)(82746002)(5660300001)(6306002)(114624004)(6346003)(8936002)(486006)(68736007)(2906002)(14454004)(53546011)(186003)(110136005)(6486002)(6506007)(26005); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:BYAPR05MB5223; H:BYAPR05MB4664.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: juniper.net does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: bhtaFNHpYZD8dhglkcJ0Gq6gUYfQBxfvIt4uVjtgKZ8XOmRRiLtzonVQyz5In1pYIKNDgasL/F9ga/aR3mSxapR7ybGfaG75y0wzZzPJqoY1upeWx9fmI8lMRuyzL3wkmjFutkuy2rZ5yuXd3Ci1Jut6zUwd6/5lfimI4dUPD0s/xWcnk47+xfYAtW6rIP2n5gvGB+TkwZsKrgFoZkcpTjX49Ct4SfhISpYUtwtMHaRXn3W2f6kEJhiBRez1Q1aG+9XMsJLPRYDOSjIPhCLujVA6wMuMgWD4xlxhKclo6mouUc3psdUVBdgG0N1ZugcHtX732qsYUAWCwAY3rHonCflkrypkkcXerZlEk8SMqlM=
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <86F0DFF2A595704CA5874E5A4680EDEB@namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 5c747ad0-82c0-43ef-a5b4-08d62e0b0c30
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 09 Oct 2018 17:17:10.2415 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: bea78b3c-4cdb-4130-854a-1d193232e5f4
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BYAPR05MB5223
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, , definitions=2018-10-09_12:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_spam_notspam policy=outbound_spam score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1807170000 definitions=main-1810090167
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/Gc7-eIAEMdaEV-6ZFPKJTX8O8hM>
Subject: Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll for draft-clemm-netmod-nmda-diff-00
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Oct 2018 17:17:24 -0000
I agree that a mandatory to implement format is desirable. I disagree that YANG-Patch is the right format, for reasons stated before. I feel that a compromise of this sort for a mandatory-to-implement is wrong. If this is what the WG wants, I withdraw my support. Kent // contributor -----Original Message----- From: Alexander Clemm <alexander.clemm@huawei.com> Date: Monday, October 8, 2018 at 5:05 PM To: Ladislav Lhotka <lhotka@nic.cz>, Kent Watsen <kwatsen@juniper.net>, Andy Bierman <andy@yumaworks.com>, Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>, "netmod@ietf.org" <netmod@ietf.org> Subject: RE: [netmod] WG adoption poll for draft-clemm-netmod-nmda-diff-00 I would second the request for one format (which is mandatory to support), which must be specified. YANG-Patch is the logical candidate IMHO. To allow selection of other formats using an input parameter makes sense, but adds some complexity from there: How to know which formats are supported? (Add a list of supported formats somewhere?) Or simply rely on augmentation for those implementations that want it? --- Alex > -----Original Message----- > From: netmod [mailto:netmod-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Ladislav Lhotka > Sent: Friday, October 05, 2018 12:50 AM > To: Kent Watsen <kwatsen@juniper.net>; Andy Bierman > <andy@yumaworks.com>; Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs- > university.de>; netmod@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll for draft-clemm-netmod-nmda-diff-00 > > Kent Watsen <kwatsen@juniper.net> writes: > > > Sure, one mandatory to implement format, others nice to have. > > Interoperability good. Agreed. > > > > But why YANG-patch and not something built for the purpose (e.g., > > YANG-diff) that, in particular, provides an actual diff as opposed to > > a data-tree operation that only shows one of the two values? > > Such a format can be developed independently, I would support it. > > Lada > > > > > Kent // contributor > > > > > > On 10/4/18, 3:27 PM, "Andy Bierman" > <andy@yumaworks.com<mailto:andy@yumaworks.com>> wrote: > > > > On Thu, Oct 4, 2018 at 12:07 PM, Juergen Schoenwaelder > <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de<mailto:j.schoenwaelder@jacobs- > university.de>> wrote: > > Folks, the more formats there are, the less interoperability we get. > > If there are multiple formats, is there a mandatory to implement > > format? Does the mandatory to implement format depend on the protocol > > that is being used? > > > > I prefer one format or if necessary I am fine with one mandatory to > > implement format. An open ended collection of implementation specific > > formats is super flexible but defeats the purpose of a standard, > > namely interoperability. > > > > I agree there needs to be 1 mandatory-to-implement format. > > > > IMO this needs to be YANG Patch because it is more precise then > > constructing an XML tree with operation attributes in it (e.g., how > > else do you represent a delete or a move?) Also, YANG Push is using > > YANG Patch format and common code for push and diff would be possible. > > > > I think other formats should be allowed. > > This is very tool-specific. I could see how somebody might want a > > textual patch of the XML representation to produce the new XML > representation. > > > > > > /js > > > > Andy > > > > > > On Thu, Oct 04, 2018 at 05:41:22PM +0000, Kent Watsen wrote: > >> We agree that the diff-format should be client-selectable, modulo what the > server supports. yang-patch and edit-config both are viable. Should we > document them both? > >> > >> That said, since neither edit-config nor yang-patch are diffing formats, so > much as formats for converting one data tree to another, would it make sense > to define an actual diffing format? I would think that a diff would provide both > values, not just a new value. > >> > >> Kent // contributor > >> > >> > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: netmod > >> <netmod-bounces@ietf.org<mailto:netmod-bounces@ietf.org>> on behalf > >> of Ladislav Lhotka <lhotka@nic.cz<mailto:lhotka@nic.cz>> > >> Organization: CZ.NIC > >> Date: Thursday, October 4, 2018 at 1:11 PM > >> To: Robert Wilton <rwilton@cisco.com<mailto:rwilton@cisco.com>>, > >> "netmod@ietf.org<mailto:netmod@ietf.org>" > >> <netmod@ietf.org<mailto:netmod@ietf.org>> > >> Subject: Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll for > >> draft-clemm-netmod-nmda-diff-00 > >> > >> On Thu, 2018-10-04 at 14:17 +0100, Robert Wilton wrote: > >> > > >> > On 04/10/2018 13:51, Ladislav Lhotka wrote: > >> > > On Thu, 2018-10-04 at 13:36 +0100, Robert Wilton wrote: > >> > > > On 04/10/2018 11:14, Martin Bjorklund wrote: > >> > > > > Phil Shafer <phil@juniper.net<mailto:phil@juniper.net>> wrote: > >> > > > > > Bal?zs Lengyel writes: > >> > > > > > > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__tool > >> > > > > > > s.ietf.org_html_draft-2Dclemm-2Dnetmod-2Dnmda-2Ddiff-2D00 > >> > > > > > > &d=DwICAg&c=HAkYuh63rsuhr6Scbfh0UjBXeMK- > ndb3voDTXcWzoCI&r > >> > > > > > > > =9zkP0xnJUvZGJ9EPoOH7Yhqn2gsBYaGTvjISlaJdcZo&m=7s6VdzzH9O > >> > > > > > > > l3BOCbVLBarBrQ5fD0vTt8k_I2KDEN97c&s=gQWJtjc_2EF3QgRvABgZK > >> > > > > > > sjqzuIw9yUq_xee6aFJOcw&e= > >> > > > > > [I've moved to a "deep lurker" role here, but ...] > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > Can we ensure this model contains a "format" leaf in the RPC's input > >> > > > > > so that future (and proprietary) formats can be supported? That > >> > > > > > leaf can be an identityref that defaults to yang-patch. > >> > > > > I think this is a good idea. I would prefer the edit-config > >> > > > > format over YANG patch for describing a diff. The > >> > > > > edit-config format is more suited for this purpose imo. > >> > > > +1 > >> > > > > >> > > > I would like something closer to edit-config to be available > >> > > > via RESTCONF as well. > >> > > YANG Patch is IMO better because it clearly separates the target > >> > > for the edits from the new content. > >> > > In edit-config these two are mixed together. > >> > Yes, that is primarily why I prefer the edit-config. I perceive > >> > that it is a denser and more efficient format. I think that it is > >> > both easier to construct (when diffing two trees) and also more > >> > efficient to apply when generating an updated tree. > >> > >> Except for certain corner cases, for example if two trees differ only > >> in the value of a single leaf but this leaf happens to be a list key. > >> > >> Lada > >> > >> > > >> > Thanks, > >> > Rob > >> > > >> > > >> > > That being said, I support specifying format/media-type and > >> > > having potentially multiple options. > >> > > > >> > > Lada > >> > > > >> > > > Thanks, > >> > > > Rob > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > /martin > >> > > > > > >> > > > > _______________________________________________ > >> > > > > netmod mailing list > >> > > > > netmod@ietf.org<mailto:netmod@ietf.org> > >> > > > > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.ietf > >> > > > > > .org_mailman_listinfo_netmod&d=DwICAg&c=HAkYuh63rsuhr6Scbfh0U > >> > > > > jBXeMK- > ndb3voDTXcWzoCI&r=9zkP0xnJUvZGJ9EPoOH7Yhqn2gsBYaGTvjIS > >> > > > > > laJdcZo&m=7s6VdzzH9Ol3BOCbVLBarBrQ5fD0vTt8k_I2KDEN97c&s=RVJcg > >> > > > > 5pzHW-zi1OboCL4SX2huW9euHiVRSCor9n_APQ&e= > >> > > > > . > >> > > > > > >> > > > _______________________________________________ > >> > > > netmod mailing list > >> > > > netmod@ietf.org<mailto:netmod@ietf.org> > >> > > > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.ietf.o > >> > > > > rg_mailman_listinfo_netmod&d=DwICAg&c=HAkYuh63rsuhr6Scbfh0UjBXe > >> > > > MK- > ndb3voDTXcWzoCI&r=9zkP0xnJUvZGJ9EPoOH7Yhqn2gsBYaGTvjISlaJdcZ > >> > > > > o&m=7s6VdzzH9Ol3BOCbVLBarBrQ5fD0vTt8k_I2KDEN97c&s=RVJcg5pzHW-zi > >> > > > 1OboCL4SX2huW9euHiVRSCor9n_APQ&e= > >> -- > >> Ladislav Lhotka > >> Head, CZ.NIC Labs > >> PGP Key ID: 0xB8F92B08A9F76C67 > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> netmod mailing list > >> netmod@ietf.org<mailto:netmod@ietf.org> > >> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.ietf.org_mai > >> lman_listinfo_netmod&d=DwICAg&c=HAkYuh63rsuhr6Scbfh0UjBXeMK- > ndb3voDTX > >> > cWzoCI&r=9zkP0xnJUvZGJ9EPoOH7Yhqn2gsBYaGTvjISlaJdcZo&m=7s6VdzzH9Ol3 > BO > >> CbVLBarBrQ5fD0vTt8k_I2KDEN97c&s=RVJcg5pzHW- > zi1OboCL4SX2huW9euHiVRSCor > >> 9n_APQ&e= > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> netmod mailing list > >> netmod@ietf.org<mailto:netmod@ietf.org> > >> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.ietf.org_mailman_listinfo_netmod&d=DwIFAg&c=HAkYuh63rsuhr6Scbfh0UjBXeMK-ndb3voDTXcWzoCI&r=9zkP0xnJUvZGJ9EPoOH7Yhqn2gsBYaGTvjISlaJdcZo&m=DM1jswnM48GwdI4tez-Jtf2ua2jvtLZVKfiwkbwbIrU&s=g0x_B-Xez7tD9hLX71D5vlcHdZohnTkiMVIKJhAHivk&e=<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__urldefense.proof&d=DwIFAg&c=HAkYuh63rsuhr6Scbfh0UjBXeMK-ndb3voDTXcWzoCI&r=9zkP0xnJUvZGJ9EPoOH7Yhqn2gsBYaGTvjISlaJdcZo&m=DM1jswnM48GwdI4tez-Jtf2ua2jvtLZVKfiwkbwbIrU&s=bzLaLoBCJ88laveupLqapYN4btjEBBvNENNy09Tsooc&e= > >> point.com/v2/url?u=https- > 3A__www.ietf.org_mailman_listinfo_netmod&d=D > >> wMFaQ&c=HAkYuh63rsuhr6Scbfh0UjBXeMK- > ndb3voDTXcWzoCI&r=9zkP0xnJUvZGJ9E > >> PoOH7Yhqn2gsBYaGTvjISlaJdcZo&m=O7d- > b9gyPvsasJo1ueKk3doDH7f5S5WQLo8_W6 > >> W3qt4&s=5LHhbfQZeoqYlC40T3mm-AEz4rSsyRWYjqTK7LuWTPw&e=> > > > > -- > > Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH > > Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany > > Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.jacobs-2D&d=DwIFAg&c=HAkYuh63rsuhr6Scbfh0UjBXeMK-ndb3voDTXcWzoCI&r=9zkP0xnJUvZGJ9EPoOH7Yhqn2gsBYaGTvjISlaJdcZo&m=DM1jswnM48GwdI4tez-Jtf2ua2jvtLZVKfiwkbwbIrU&s=5RD96-TjymU1ZhmfZFtWEm4abkkdaxqrkCKzuv4PZRQ&e= > university.de/<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https- > 3A__www.jacobs- > 2Duniversity.de_&d=DwMFaQ&c=HAkYuh63rsuhr6Scbfh0UjBXeMK- > ndb3voDTXcWzoCI&r=9zkP0xnJUvZGJ9EPoOH7Yhqn2gsBYaGTvjISlaJdcZo&m=O > 7d- > b9gyPvsasJo1ueKk3doDH7f5S5WQLo8_W6W3qt4&s=zh7qEPSmwviaSqZBqG1Gc > qItXwI9pwyqIFVW6xC8rK8&e=>> > > > > _______________________________________________ > > netmod mailing list > > netmod@ietf.org<mailto:netmod@ietf.org> > > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.ietf.org_mailman_listinfo_netmod&d=DwIFAg&c=HAkYuh63rsuhr6Scbfh0UjBXeMK-ndb3voDTXcWzoCI&r=9zkP0xnJUvZGJ9EPoOH7Yhqn2gsBYaGTvjISlaJdcZo&m=DM1jswnM48GwdI4tez-Jtf2ua2jvtLZVKfiwkbwbIrU&s=g0x_B-Xez7tD9hLX71D5vlcHdZohnTkiMVIKJhAHivk&e=<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__urldefense.proofp&d=DwIFAg&c=HAkYuh63rsuhr6Scbfh0UjBXeMK-ndb3voDTXcWzoCI&r=9zkP0xnJUvZGJ9EPoOH7Yhqn2gsBYaGTvjISlaJdcZo&m=DM1jswnM48GwdI4tez-Jtf2ua2jvtLZVKfiwkbwbIrU&s=id5kdXDEb4afnobWT-fUq3YfsIkHooz5RtXYsoQRt1o&e= > > oint.com/v2/url?u=https- > 3A__www.ietf.org_mailman_listinfo_netmod&d=DwM > > FaQ&c=HAkYuh63rsuhr6Scbfh0UjBXeMK- > ndb3voDTXcWzoCI&r=9zkP0xnJUvZGJ9EPoO > > H7Yhqn2gsBYaGTvjISlaJdcZo&m=O7d- > b9gyPvsasJo1ueKk3doDH7f5S5WQLo8_W6W3qt > > 4&s=5LHhbfQZeoqYlC40T3mm-AEz4rSsyRWYjqTK7LuWTPw&e=> > > > > _______________________________________________ > > netmod mailing list > > netmod@ietf.org > > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.ietf.org_mailman_listinfo_netmod&d=DwIFAg&c=HAkYuh63rsuhr6Scbfh0UjBXeMK-ndb3voDTXcWzoCI&r=9zkP0xnJUvZGJ9EPoOH7Yhqn2gsBYaGTvjISlaJdcZo&m=DM1jswnM48GwdI4tez-Jtf2ua2jvtLZVKfiwkbwbIrU&s=g0x_B-Xez7tD9hLX71D5vlcHdZohnTkiMVIKJhAHivk&e= > > -- > Ladislav Lhotka > Head, CZ.NIC Labs > PGP Key ID: 0xB8F92B08A9F76C67 > > _______________________________________________ > netmod mailing list > netmod@ietf.org > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.ietf.org_mailman_listinfo_netmod&d=DwIFAg&c=HAkYuh63rsuhr6Scbfh0UjBXeMK-ndb3voDTXcWzoCI&r=9zkP0xnJUvZGJ9EPoOH7Yhqn2gsBYaGTvjISlaJdcZo&m=DM1jswnM48GwdI4tez-Jtf2ua2jvtLZVKfiwkbwbIrU&s=g0x_B-Xez7tD9hLX71D5vlcHdZohnTkiMVIKJhAHivk&e=
- [netmod] WG adoption poll for draft-clemm-netmod-… Kent Watsen
- Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll for draft-clemm-net… Jeff Tantsura
- Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll for draft-clemm-net… Alexander Clemm
- Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll for draft-clemm-net… Ladislav Lhotka
- Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll for draft-clemm-net… Qin Wu
- Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll for draft-clemm-net… Reshad Rahman (rrahman)
- Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll for draft-clemm-net… Kent Watsen
- Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll for draft-clemm-net… Reshad Rahman (rrahman)
- Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll for draft-clemm-net… Robert Wilton
- Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll for draft-clemm-net… Acee Lindem (acee)
- Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll for draft-clemm-net… Martin Bjorklund
- Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll for draft-clemm-net… Yingzhen Qu
- Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll for draft-clemm-net… Susan Hares
- Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll for draft-clemm-net… Kent Watsen
- Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll for draft-clemm-net… Balázs Lengyel
- Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll for draft-clemm-net… Phil Shafer
- Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll for draft-clemm-net… Martin Bjorklund
- Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll for draft-clemm-net… Robert Wilton
- Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll for draft-clemm-net… Ladislav Lhotka
- Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll for draft-clemm-net… Robert Wilton
- Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll for draft-clemm-net… Martin Bjorklund
- Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll for draft-clemm-net… Andy Bierman
- Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll for draft-clemm-net… Ladislav Lhotka
- Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll for draft-clemm-net… Kent Watsen
- Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll for draft-clemm-net… Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll for draft-clemm-net… Andy Bierman
- Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll for draft-clemm-net… Kent Watsen
- Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll for draft-clemm-net… Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll for draft-clemm-net… Reshad Rahman (rrahman)
- Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll for draft-clemm-net… Andy Bierman
- Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll for draft-clemm-net… Ladislav Lhotka
- Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll for draft-clemm-net… Ladislav Lhotka
- Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll for draft-clemm-net… Ladislav Lhotka
- Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll for draft-clemm-net… Alexander Clemm
- Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll for draft-clemm-net… Xufeng Liu
- Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll for draft-clemm-net… Tianran Zhou
- Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll for draft-clemm-net… Susan Hares
- Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll for draft-clemm-net… Kent Watsen
- Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll for draft-clemm-net… Alexander Clemm
- Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll for draft-clemm-net… Kent Watsen
- Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll for draft-clemm-net… Andy Bierman
- Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll for draft-clemm-net… Kent Watsen
- Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll for draft-clemm-net… Kent Watsen
- Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll for draft-clemm-net… Alexander Clemm