Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll for draft-clemm-netmod-nmda-diff-00

On Thu, 2018-10-04 at 13:36 +0100, Robert Wilton wrote:
> 
> On 04/10/2018 11:14, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
> > Phil Shafer <phil@juniper.net> wrote:
> > > Bal?zs Lengyel writes:
> > > > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-clemm-netmod-nmda-diff-00
> > > [I've moved to a "deep lurker" role here, but ...]
> > > 
> > > Can we ensure this model contains a "format" leaf in the RPC's input
> > > so that future (and proprietary) formats can be supported?   That
> > > leaf can be an identityref that defaults to yang-patch.
> > I think this is a good idea.  I would prefer the edit-config format
> > over YANG patch for describing a diff.  The edit-config format is more
> > suited for this purpose imo.
> +1
> 
> I would like something closer to edit-config to be available via 
> RESTCONF as well.

YANG Patch is IMO better because it clearly separates the target for the edits
from the new content. In edit-config these two are mixed together.

That being said, I support specifying format/media-type and having potentially
multiple options.

Lada

> 
> Thanks,
> Rob
> 
> 
> > 
> > /martin
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > netmod mailing list
> > netmod@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
> > .
> > 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> netmod mailing list
> netmod@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
-- 
Ladislav Lhotka
Head, CZ.NIC Labs
PGP Key ID: 0xB8F92B08A9F76C67