Re: [netmod] AD review of draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6021-bis-00.txt
Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de> Mon, 25 March 2013 17:27 UTC
Return-Path: <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2256C21F8B27 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Mar 2013 10:27:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.949
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.949 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.300, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dTHxQ20ANDLC for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Mar 2013 10:27:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hermes.jacobs-university.de (hermes.jacobs-university.de [212.201.44.23]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D5D521F8B25 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Mar 2013 10:27:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (demetrius1.jacobs-university.de [212.201.44.46]) by hermes.jacobs-university.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12AEB20BC1; Mon, 25 Mar 2013 18:27:44 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at jacobs-university.de
Received: from hermes.jacobs-university.de ([212.201.44.23]) by localhost (demetrius1.jacobs-university.de [212.201.44.32]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JRNVsIiDPOgX; Mon, 25 Mar 2013 18:27:44 +0100 (CET)
Received: from elstar.local (elstar.jacobs.jacobs-university.de [10.50.231.133]) by hermes.jacobs-university.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60825206D7; Mon, 25 Mar 2013 18:27:43 +0100 (CET)
Received: by elstar.local (Postfix, from userid 501) id CF5E4252FF47; Mon, 25 Mar 2013 18:27:47 +0100 (CET)
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2013 18:27:47 +0100
From: Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>
To: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <20130325172747.GA23391@elstar.local>
Mail-Followup-To: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>, NETMOD Working Group <netmod@ietf.org>
References: <514C93E9.8@cisco.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <514C93E9.8@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Cc: NETMOD Working Group <netmod@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [netmod] AD review of draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6021-bis-00.txt
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netmod>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2013 17:27:47 -0000
Hi, I have posted a new I-D that addresses your comments (I hope). I also fixed the quoting bug reported by Jernej Tuljak <jernej.tuljak@gmail.com> on the mailing list on 2013-02-24. The diff is already available here: http://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6021-bis-01.txt /js On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 06:24:57PM +0100, Benoit Claise wrote: > Juergen, NETMOD participants, > > Two comments > > 1. > For the ip-address-no-zone, ipv4-address-no-zone, and > ipv6-address-no-zone, don't you need a reference to the zone > information in the description? > > description > "The ip-address-no-zone type represents an IP address without > zone information in an IP version neutral way. The format > of the textual representations implies the IP version."; > > Doesn't give me a pointer to what a zone information is. So I don't > know what ip-address-no-zone is. > Note: I faced the zone issue only a year ago. Before that, I had no > clue what it was. > > > 2. > The section "Appendix A. Changes from RFC 6021" is pretty light: > > This version adds new type definitions to the YANG modules. For > the further details, see the revision statement of the YANG modules. > > Take it or leave it. However, I can tell that its resolution will > please some IESG members, specifically because the rfcdiff tool > doesn't do a good job of comparing RFC6021 with > draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6021-bis-00.txt > > Proposal > > This version adds new type definitions to the YANG modules. The > first YANG module, ietf-yang-types adds the following new data > types: yang-identifier, hex-string, uuid, and dotted-quad. The > second YANG module, ietf-inet-types, adds the following new data > types: ip-address-no-zone, ipv4-address-no-zone, and > ipv6-address-no-zone. > > Regards, Benoit (OPS AD) -- Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1, 28759 Bremen, Germany Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <http://www.jacobs-university.de/>
- [netmod] AD review of draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6021-b… Benoit Claise
- Re: [netmod] AD review of draft-ietf-netmod-rfc60… Ladislav Lhotka
- Re: [netmod] AD review of draft-ietf-netmod-rfc60… Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [netmod] AD review of draft-ietf-netmod-rfc60… Benoit Claise
- Re: [netmod] AD review of draft-ietf-netmod-rfc60… Ladislav Lhotka
- Re: [netmod] AD review of draft-ietf-netmod-rfc60… Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [netmod] AD review of draft-ietf-netmod-rfc60… Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [netmod] AD review of draft-ietf-netmod-rfc60… Ladislav Lhotka
- Re: [netmod] AD review of draft-ietf-netmod-rfc60… Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [netmod] AD review of draft-ietf-netmod-rfc60… Benoit Claise
- Re: [netmod] AD review of draft-ietf-netmod-rfc60… Ladislav Lhotka
- Re: [netmod] AD review of draft-ietf-netmod-rfc60… Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [netmod] AD review of draft-ietf-netmod-rfc60… Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [netmod] AD review of draft-ietf-netmod-rfc60… Benoit Claise
- Re: [netmod] AD review of draft-ietf-netmod-rfc60… Benoit Claise