Re: [netmod] WGLC: draft-ietf-netmod-geo-location-04

Mahesh Jethanandani <mjethanandani@gmail.com> Fri, 27 March 2020 17:37 UTC

Return-Path: <mjethanandani@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A100F3A0F3C for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 Mar 2020 10:37:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PoWOS91nHB4I for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 Mar 2020 10:37:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pg1-x531.google.com (mail-pg1-x531.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::531]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CB9EA3A1005 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Fri, 27 Mar 2020 10:37:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pg1-x531.google.com with SMTP id b22so4896227pgb.6 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Fri, 27 Mar 2020 10:37:11 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=content-transfer-encoding:from:mime-version:subject:date:message-id :references:cc:in-reply-to:to; bh=l2xdcwfQEG7CbuCn22USXoi9XJRGokg0vaQT8NVC1oA=; b=eJK79Q3jOPQ7MeDnNnax7bntQ1EGRTa7ps9GDKiRXuKE01FSCP5OfH2kC7zta8e4Um Nd8wQpE6bTouE7JhfPSQDQgJfEUDvRDQqVOSMV2snQcxhUOnRm39TxnQFORAok/VNLKP oUtg4Ccgcy1JjqMdApDLZDq1agw78CPhDSXYVFWHrT66U+PBobvyBY4pgSf+nWlthJLa zGD0pqkCcSoJMiOq3mdkP+6qzwsgPGTgWGn259TcR9oyq188fPp3uxBUmPb0q7tXlz78 DKAwPTq0oo/e5vINlkEBvpf/LSXvLUlenPyuxdvy7AZOs6w2Mqv5VuIStFV2vA/h5F+L En3w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:content-transfer-encoding:from:mime-version :subject:date:message-id:references:cc:in-reply-to:to; bh=l2xdcwfQEG7CbuCn22USXoi9XJRGokg0vaQT8NVC1oA=; b=OJSxQAKuFJaJ5pAjDafAkFb6letfEewgZAvss+Jcwe9r+UqXNAGR9FMteZcJZAIoRo iRl0N6AetHnPUzy5atpIHdZLzSihrE7ezt+vTAP7wAlpNfRXzx6rX4d4HTYnqMm0G248 hTWrLovSUwebrdYzdn8BdAboI/yEI+Rib6uqCPmt6q3HPhdreONmOsATtc06K8DAievM Gxvi4I3pdppf+FA0G3KB54GtLKbLpDRgAfCUTWHvM5Ww254O7nOOvX0F8dzWl50TWXBS 1y4hWMy0fAS3cfP9D9d8kdr0cdBCHWDf7ZpBtOAdTfpZ3vpNg8KDMY2dDH+LuAk03EAf AtfA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ3m/+LqW1X8zHhDOP7AMRjMSkhk+HnjRflsbbPH4gQiCbsL4eXH QXxF+8cMesFvC4xN5AxXcrk=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vvPbstM7r4hpEQU4KHIXDiTsCLSCueaGhMtHK3/e7lAVV8IOdi3eDqYklcbscPtjYVD0zlgSA==
X-Received: by 2002:aa7:96ae:: with SMTP id g14mr293999pfk.216.1585330631073; Fri, 27 Mar 2020 10:37:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2607:fb90:4e8f:a321:a544:5df7:24c0:6366? ([2607:fb90:4e8f:a321:a544:5df7:24c0:6366]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d71sm4609528pfd.46.2020.03.27.10.37.09 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 27 Mar 2020 10:37:10 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
From: Mahesh Jethanandani <mjethanandani@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2020 10:37:07 -0700
Message-Id: <1D24C2B7-C24E-43D4-AB5A-98D09F485A5A@gmail.com>
References: <DB7PR07MB5657B7FF2AC7FFB4AE81333FA0CC0@DB7PR07MB5657.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
Cc: Kent Watsen <kent+ietf@watsen.net>, "netmod@ietf.org" <netmod@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <DB7PR07MB5657B7FF2AC7FFB4AE81333FA0CC0@DB7PR07MB5657.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
To: tom petch <ietfc@btconnect.com>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (17C54)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/GpEPSLc23NmtbXQ46sHu7z2jTJU>
Subject: Re: [netmod] WGLC: draft-ietf-netmod-geo-location-04
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2020 17:37:50 -0000

Hi Tom,

Not questioning the Not Ready status for the overall draft, but on the issues you raise about the yang model ...

> On Mar 27, 2020, at 10:09 AM, tom petch <ietfc@btconnect.com> wrote:
> 
> Kent
> 
> Not Ready
> 
> I thought that so obvious that it was not worth saying:-)
> 
> e.g.
> IANA considerations does not register the namespace so there is no module
> Security Considerations does not use template (which other grouping modules such as Kent's do)
> No YANG version

Which version statement were you referring to? There is one in the model with the date 2019-02-17. 

> Wrong prefix for ietf-yang-types

Does the prefix have to be the same as what the model declares? None of the tools complain about it. 

> No reference clause for yang types

Yes, as pointed out in the review. 

> A wholesale lack of YANG reference clauses; perhaps half a dozen needed
> No Normative reference for yang-types

Yes, as pointed out in the review. 

> Insufficient information for IANA - I infer they are being asked to create a registry but details seem lacking compared to the requirements in RFC8126
> 
> At which point I stop and await a fresh revision before having another go.
> 
> Tom Petch
> 
> ________________________________________
> From: netmod <netmod-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Kent Watsen <kent+ietf@watsen.net>
> Sent: 26 March 2020 18:46
> 
> Dear All,
> 
> This WGLC has received zero responses, which is insufficient to progress the document at this time.  The WGLC is therefore being extended  for another week, now ending April 1st (the day before our Virtual Meeting on April 2nd).
> 
> Again, positive comments, e.g., "I've reviewed this document and believe it is ready for publication", are welcomed.  This is useful and important, even from authors.  Objections, concerns, and suggestions are also welcomed at this time.
> 
> FWIW, the YANG Doctor review was completed on 3/23 (thanks Mahesh) with the “Ready with Nits” status: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/review-ietf-netmod-geo-location-04-yangdoctors-lc-jethanandani-2020-03-23.
> 
> Kent // as shepherd and co-chair
> 
> 
> 
> On Mar 9, 2020, at 6:30 PM, Kent Watsen <kent+ietf@watsen.net<mailto:kent+ietf@watsen.net>> wrote:
> 
> This message begins an almost two-week WGLC for draft-ietf-netmod-geo-location-04 ending on March 22nd (the day before the NETMOD sessions).  Here is a direct link to the HTML version of the draft:
> 
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-netmod-geo-location-04
> 
> Positive comments, e.g., "I've reviewed this document and believe it is ready for publication", are welcome!  This is useful and important, even from authors. Objections, concerns, and suggestions are also welcomed at this time.
> 
> Thank you,
> NETMOD Chairs
> 
> _______________________________________________
> netmod mailing list
> netmod@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> netmod mailing list
> netmod@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod

Mahesh Jethanandani 
mjethanandani@gmail.com