Re: [netmod] rfc6991bis: loopback addresses
"Reshad Rahman (rrahman)" <rrahman@cisco.com> Mon, 20 July 2020 13:39 UTC
Return-Path: <rrahman@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E63B3A0912 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Jul 2020 06:39:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.62
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.62 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=DYyrbm5x; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=E8I3QJsF
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2kJ0FMGz6CTx for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Jul 2020 06:39:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-7.cisco.com (alln-iport-7.cisco.com [173.37.142.94]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8C1873A0915 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Mon, 20 Jul 2020 06:39:04 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2390; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1595252344; x=1596461944; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=hyFVK/9YYfbiBPF73ACxLlw+3mJXNF54D9q5czFTHzs=; b=DYyrbm5xf0ZcJuVh9itUJ2hxl0typ9qP8mxa37b35ljJqNzgb63dnMtV kRbh+mdqbQ8mk7gu+XGQWnfirGOG1p5ZENVOaAA9vBBlkU17sne/HFXuI QGp7kuIW0wulazY3mDSh1yDf0nGrwEGowNMoVTNzWoZZCwUgtW8Uy+MLf Y=;
IronPort-PHdr: 9a23:7zxmvh0k4UL6V2ztsmDT+zVfbzU7u7jyIg8e44YmjLQLaKm44pD+JxWFv6dnkFTOW4PW4O4CgO3T4OjsWm0FtJCGtn1KMJlBTAQMhshemQs8SNWEBkv2IL+PDWQ6Ec1OWUUj8yS9Nk5YS8zibFrUpHC58XgZHRCsfQZwL/7+T4jVicn/3uuu+prVNgNPgjf1Yb57IBis6wvLscxDiop5IaF3wRzM8XY=
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0ALBgC2nRVf/4gNJK1dAxwBAQEBAQEHAQESAQEEBAEBQIFKgVJRB29YLywKhCmDRgONJCWYXoJTA1ULAQEBDAEBGAsKAgQBAYQIRAIXgggCJDgTAgMBAQsBAQUBAQECAQYEbYVcDIVxAQEBAQMBARAREQwBASwLAQ0CAgEIEAUBBAImAgICGQwLFRACBAENBSKDBAGCSwMuAQ6fOwKBOYhhdoEygwEBAQWBNwKDThiCDgMGBYEJKoJqg1WGMxqBQT+BOAwQgk0+glwBAQOBXBcKJoJPM4Itjy0pgwCidQqCXYhWkQ0DHp9IkgGKJ5RYAgQCBAUCDgEBBYFqI4FXcBU7KgGCPlAXAg2OHoNxM4RhhUJ0NwIGAQcBAQMJfI4CAYEQAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.75,375,1589241600"; d="scan'208";a="514940111"
Received: from alln-core-3.cisco.com ([173.36.13.136]) by alln-iport-7.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 20 Jul 2020 13:39:03 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-005.cisco.com (xch-rcd-005.cisco.com [173.37.102.15]) by alln-core-3.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 06KDd3MU027960 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 20 Jul 2020 13:39:03 GMT
Received: from xhs-rcd-001.cisco.com (173.37.227.246) by XCH-RCD-005.cisco.com (173.37.102.15) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Mon, 20 Jul 2020 08:39:03 -0500
Received: from xhs-rtp-003.cisco.com (64.101.210.230) by xhs-rcd-001.cisco.com (173.37.227.246) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Mon, 20 Jul 2020 08:39:03 -0500
Received: from NAM11-BN8-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (64.101.32.56) by xhs-rtp-003.cisco.com (64.101.210.230) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 20 Jul 2020 09:39:03 -0400
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=m5inwYl9deMc9XHrZ6vvdTqDC9LESdo6YE+HG/BEUGVk8FNiZy57waqOMXcIVrQb7++nVHMCo+oloMR8L+aVEP1ufhT9w/0zpvu0HTmEyKkmFFabiGipDaesbV4KoMysFzS2SWUimBt7bJ634B7vK2WSAAh27FvWcQCm1OAyZrVhisktNduMLs5Kx96Nt0a7Kz14Yr3V6FSQbMrU6h4W2HC2HBQYKNLEYvBFA5yuqYHe1grvsyrl6ebc5+CJAwnnxeq3IkqnwpThEhWSv1Jt+EiA4ANszd8gaie+jnEnuezo06NmonlBpUd/7apasKv8LYxwkvm5b304vjTHNpEoGg==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=hyFVK/9YYfbiBPF73ACxLlw+3mJXNF54D9q5czFTHzs=; b=G3Rp6t+1WMvBbe6CWMz9pGFr3WWF8qPxOjrd7jMSvQL5d5zmtOnMAQTeXSjVKWSP/CF4D2UPwzrjCTXN+4A47iwddKbdEWB1T7g+uHNmjdjKoENIPf3KOoXygPmhmBh7pKM9K4I7Q/s4+wr3GzOCNdj9LoAeZrVWlrXOSpbfDTwGaJix6Pr360n7D3AX4xEUEpHGHCc7TOAcHr93yMzVXIavn1lC74vAapSXgI2b7ocvTjSrx0fFUzA4PQcG3EwsBB45M4mecJYi4bi6stPcefDG6tm2q9zp5b6C2Ol5EqtcX1hpf3OFGW1/bBtOEXCcRAoh3hQbqW2uBUopB0UqUA==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cisco.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cisco.com; dkim=pass header.d=cisco.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-cisco-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=hyFVK/9YYfbiBPF73ACxLlw+3mJXNF54D9q5czFTHzs=; b=E8I3QJsFp7MmPjEPjWFz4rQFQVW2vEjs3U1N5yfumUDwCqK66Cw3aMG+D23MqMlFz40hUd+OkSQQhQ/u0JVoRJyYcrgqs6enFQtYg28kmcu35oXC5acs3e9QHfi8jOex6gJnuQ4mfafW+UmVAkgFkE9TnLmkNSIkXNT/ga+deTc=
Received: from BN6PR11MB3875.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:405:80::37) by BN6PR11MB2004.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:404:3c::10) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3195.17; Mon, 20 Jul 2020 13:39:02 +0000
Received: from BN6PR11MB3875.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::3076:a505:335e:a8ff]) by BN6PR11MB3875.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::3076:a505:335e:a8ff%6]) with mapi id 15.20.3195.025; Mon, 20 Jul 2020 13:39:02 +0000
From: "Reshad Rahman (rrahman)" <rrahman@cisco.com>
To: tom petch <ietfc@btconnect.com>, "netmod@ietf.org" <netmod@ietf.org>, Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>
Thread-Topic: [netmod] rfc6991bis: loopback addresses
Thread-Index: AQHWXHApxk7Hupk8m0u2QlCQJaxtSakQK66AgAAOowA=
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2020 13:39:02 +0000
Message-ID: <64A58592-5FD0-4752-8069-E59E62C3F699@cisco.com>
References: <20200717192556.63e7gfbbrn2qyqzo@anna.jacobs.jacobs-university.de> <AM6PR07MB52220AD16FAC337D4F89A674A07B0@AM6PR07MB5222.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <AM6PR07MB52220AD16FAC337D4F89A674A07B0@AM6PR07MB5222.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/16.37.20051002
authentication-results: btconnect.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;btconnect.com; dmarc=none action=none header.from=cisco.com;
x-originating-ip: [142.113.229.50]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: e01c9989-99eb-48fd-b9c7-08d82cb24386
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: BN6PR11MB2004:
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BN6PR11MB2004AC106E5D55749DAA7DF4AB7B0@BN6PR11MB2004.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:9508;
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: rhbnVk4CYcIZxk5Y6jIaOPXeY1lzZOh9iVBLnrNd5taNdFCfwxXz4/FJoRx6cWBJhuWHJR3dD3feYvRGppQ0SDLuqdYiAINUBwXvgNit9CP9YDNx9nclpdb+9Gq8sFHbJ50yEr20116idJki8HdiV3YNHKgZf39hWFlI1yLvLuH2gqSyXV7WdUpzwLnHhm5JHmoGcVd57Ie7VpdhHxJrOziCJXkzig344lN8PvY+rpTC5sdY2Qc/WQpKHqeS7FMLuedhVHwiIsxCwDIsc3fexJ6Xb13xFpa0cwmH3BscQuVCN5AjgnfKXrhCF3nL0gELjvJloru00fZptk+whWp+RN2xi3qG4yxg9fFoL+SqKMKOApW5turOol9yREdcy613uMtVjqdhraELL/LoApVfww==
x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:BN6PR11MB3875.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFTY:; SFS:(4636009)(39860400002)(376002)(136003)(346002)(366004)(396003)(6506007)(107886003)(186003)(83080400001)(5660300002)(8676002)(8936002)(478600001)(296002)(966005)(26005)(316002)(2616005)(71200400001)(110136005)(66556008)(64756008)(36756003)(86362001)(4326008)(6486002)(83380400001)(2906002)(33656002)(6512007)(76116006)(91956017)(66946007)(66476007)(66446008); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101;
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: 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
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <DD8A5EB7B9424B4FB99ED359F0E59C90@namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Internal
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: BN6PR11MB3875.namprd11.prod.outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: e01c9989-99eb-48fd-b9c7-08d82cb24386
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 20 Jul 2020 13:39:02.0809 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: /xpU8nTxSwouAPvmpQeLbHaVEL+RnwqozfYVv/kWwuiSm5RmZwwF7xxaSfGSnso26vLDhuBmG6gCUYOZx+c7/w==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BN6PR11MB2004
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.37.102.15, xch-rcd-005.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: alln-core-3.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/GrWi7sNfjBYNF8QNPbnbpD9xwaQ>
Subject: Re: [netmod] rfc6991bis: loopback addresses
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2020 13:39:08 -0000
I don't understand the comment "...implementation choice of one manufacturer." As for the details, see https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-nainar-mpls-lsp-ping-yang-00 Regards, Reshad. On 2020-07-20, 4:47 AM, "netmod on behalf of tom petch" <netmod-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of ietfc@btconnect.com> wrote: I am not a fan of loopback seeing it as the implementation choice of one manufacturer. On the other hand, the IETF has defined documentation addresses which many if not most writers of examples for YANG modules seem unaware of so if we add anything, I would add those. Tom Petch From: netmod <netmod-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de> Sent: 17 July 2020 20:25 - There was a request to add types for loopback addresses (127.0.0.0/8 and ::1/128). - This is related to an effort to define a YANG module for MPLS LSP Ping (RFC 8029) but the details are unclear, i.e., what is exactly needed and how such a type will be used and whether there is a common need for types for loopback addresses. - Proposal: do not add such types at this point in time -- Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <https://www.jacobs-university.de/> _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
- [netmod] rfc6991bis: loopback addresses Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [netmod] rfc6991bis: loopback addresses tom petch
- Re: [netmod] rfc6991bis: loopback addresses Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [netmod] rfc6991bis: loopback addresses tom petch
- Re: [netmod] rfc6991bis: loopback addresses Reshad Rahman (rrahman)
- Re: [netmod] rfc6991bis: loopback addresses Erik Auerswald
- Re: [netmod] rfc6991bis: loopback addresses tom petch
- Re: [netmod] rfc6991bis: loopback addresses Reshad Rahman (rrahman)
- Re: [netmod] rfc6991bis: loopback addresses Reshad Rahman (rrahman)
- Re: [netmod] rfc6991bis: loopback addresses Nagendra Kumar Nainar (naikumar)
- Re: [netmod] rfc6991bis: loopback addresses Nagendra Kumar Nainar (naikumar)
- Re: [netmod] rfc6991bis: loopback addresses Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [netmod] rfc6991bis: loopback addresses Nagendra Kumar Nainar (naikumar)
- Re: [netmod] rfc6991bis: loopback addresses Kent Watsen
- Re: [netmod] rfc6991bis: loopback addresses Acee Lindem (acee)
- Re: [netmod] rfc6991bis: loopback addresses Qin Wu
- Re: [netmod] rfc6991bis: loopback addresses Acee Lindem (acee)
- Re: [netmod] rfc6991bis: loopback addresses Qin Wu
- Re: [netmod] rfc6991bis: loopback addresses tom petch
- Re: [netmod] rfc6991bis: loopback addresses tom petch