Re: [netmod] rfc6991bis: inet:host
Ladislav Lhotka <ladislav.lhotka@nic.cz> Mon, 20 July 2020 09:05 UTC
Return-Path: <ladislav.lhotka@nic.cz>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10E0D3A08DB for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Jul 2020 02:05:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id t-AUU-6Sm2Jg for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Jul 2020 02:05:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from trail.lhotka.name (trail.lhotka.name [77.48.224.143]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B17BE3A08E1 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Mon, 20 Jul 2020 02:04:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by trail.lhotka.name (Postfix, from userid 109) id BE6948600C7; Mon, 20 Jul 2020 10:56:53 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from localhost (nat-1.nic.cz [217.31.205.1]) by trail.lhotka.name (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2768986005D; Mon, 20 Jul 2020 10:56:51 +0200 (CEST)
From: Ladislav Lhotka <ladislav.lhotka@nic.cz>
To: Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>, netmod@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <20200717191717.u5a3wv4nbajjdcaj@anna.jacobs.jacobs-university.de>
References: <20200717191717.u5a3wv4nbajjdcaj@anna.jacobs.jacobs-university.de>
Mail-Followup-To: Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>, netmod@ietf.org
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2020 11:04:55 +0200
Message-ID: <87ft9mzhe0.fsf@nic.cz>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/HDXhull68WgYS9gIeU76lKPbGYY>
Subject: Re: [netmod] rfc6991bis: inet:host
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2020 09:05:05 -0000
Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de> writes: > - Lada suggested to replace the inet:domain-name usage in > the union with a new host-name definition that follows > the NR-LDH definition in RFC 5890. > > - Unclear which problem is fixed and how this works from a > backwards compatibility perspective. > > - See the thread '6991bis: host' in your private list archive > (I can't find it in the IETF archive) > > - I can't tell for sure that Lada's proposal is (i) correct and (ii) > not breaking anything > > - Proposal: ? Maybe it is better to basically keep the existing inet:domain name for use e.g. in host names that appear in all kinds of non-DNS configuration, and leave the definition of a domain name type appropriate for use in DNS zone data etc. to DNSOP WG. So my proposal is to only modify the description accordingly, and in particular remove the comment about the use in A/AAAA/SRV resource records, because the existing type isn't really suitable for this purpose. Lada > > -- > Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH > Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany > Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <https://www.jacobs-university.de/> > > _______________________________________________ > netmod mailing list > netmod@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod -- Ladislav Lhotka Head, CZ.NIC Labs PGP Key ID: 0xB8F92B08A9F76C67
- [netmod] rfc6991bis: inet:host Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [netmod] rfc6991bis: inet:host tom petch
- Re: [netmod] rfc6991bis: inet:host Ladislav Lhotka
- Re: [netmod] rfc6991bis: inet:host Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [netmod] rfc6991bis: inet:host Ladislav Lhotka
- Re: [netmod] rfc6991bis: inet:host tom petch
- Re: [netmod] rfc6991bis: inet:host Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [netmod] rfc6991bis: inet:host Ladislav Lhotka
- Re: [netmod] rfc6991bis: inet:host Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [netmod] rfc6991bis: inet:host Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [netmod] rfc6991bis: inet:host Erik Auerswald
- Re: [netmod] rfc6991bis: inet:host Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [netmod] rfc6991bis: inet:host Ladislav Lhotka
- Re: [netmod] rfc6991bis: inet:host Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [netmod] rfc6991bis: inet:host Ladislav Lhotka
- Re: [netmod] rfc6991bis: inet:host Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [netmod] rfc6991bis: inet:host Ladislav Lhotka
- Re: [netmod] rfc6991bis: inet:host Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [netmod] rfc6991bis: inet:host Ladislav Lhotka
- Re: [netmod] rfc6991bis: inet:host Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [netmod] rfc6991bis: inet:host Ladislav Lhotka