IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [netmod] Kathleen Moriarty's Discuss on draft-ietf-netmod-rfc7277bis-01: (with DISCUSS)

Martin Bjorklund <mbj@tail-f.com> Tue, 09 January 2018 07:28 UTC

Return-Path: <mbj@tail-f.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29AE812D7F7; Mon, 8 Jan 2018 23:28:56 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VSBoDXRPm3dB; Mon, 8 Jan 2018 23:28:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.tail-f.com (mail.tail-f.com [46.21.102.45]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66525127909; Mon, 8 Jan 2018 23:28:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (unknown [173.38.220.56]) by mail.tail-f.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5CE911AE0144; Tue, 9 Jan 2018 08:28:53 +0100 (CET)
Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2018 08:27:11 +0100
Message-Id: <20180109.082711.971204319569734613.mbj@tail-f.com>
To: Kathleen.Moriarty.ietf@gmail.com
Cc: iesg@ietf.org, netmod-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-netmod-rfc7277bis@ietf.org, netmod@ietf.org
From: Martin Bjorklund <mbj@tail-f.com>
In-Reply-To: <151544838502.11225.12200905325785852409.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: <151544838502.11225.12200905325785852409.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
X-Mailer: Mew version 6.7 on Emacs 24.5 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/HLKjdKVXKn_trD5Ucu2o7zmWa2c>
Subject: Re: [netmod] Kathleen Moriarty's Discuss on draft-ietf-netmod-rfc7277bis-01: (with DISCUSS)
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2018 07:28:56 -0000

Hi,

Kathleen Moriarty <Kathleen.Moriarty.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> DISCUSS:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Hello,
> 
> I'm a little confused on the Security Consideration section as it doesn't use
> the latest template, but does specify SSH for NETCONF, so I'm good with that
> part.  Will RESTCONF also be used as a transport or is there some reason it
> won't be used for this YANG module?
> 
> Here's what I think is the latest template and please let me know if sections
> of it do not apply to this draft and I'll drop the discuss for correcting the
> security considerations section.
> 
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6087bis-10#page-52

I have updated to the latest version in my local copy.


/martin

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email