Re: [netmod] AD review of draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model-20

["t.petch" <[e-mail]>]

----- Original Message -----
From: "Clyde Wildes (cwildes)" <[e-mail]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2018 9:21 PM

> Kent, Tom, Yaron, and Ron,
>
> A new version of the draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model has been published
that addresses your concerns.

Optimist:-)

And we can always have fresh concerns:-(

I note that this I-D imports interface-ref  from RFC7223 while
                    draft-ietf-netmod-rfc7223bis
is in the RFC Edittor's queue.  I do not think that there is any reason
not to use the latter.

Tom Petch


>
> Thanks,
>
> Clyde
>
> On 2/20/18, 9:06 AM, "netmod on behalf of Kent Watsen"
<[e-mail] on behalf of [e-mail]> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>     > Kent
>     >
>     > You illustrate beautifully the problem I would like a solution
to.
>     >
>     > The current thinking AFAICT is that tree-diagrams
>     > should be an Informative Reference.
>     >
>     > Therefore, the RFC Editor will not hold publication until an RFC
number
>     > is assigned.
>     >
>     > Therefore, a note asking the I-D reference to be updated to
reflect the
>     > assigned RFC number is null - the RFC can be published with the
>     > reference as an i-d and not as an RFC which is what I expect the
RFC
>     > Editor to do.
>     >
>     > QED
>
>
>     Except I know that this draft will be stuck in MISREF state and
tree-diagrams
>     will in fact be assigned an RFC number by the time this draft is
published.
>
>     K.
>
>
>     > Note that this is not the case of a Normative i-d reference
being buried
>     > in the YANG module and not being.noticed by the RFC Editor; that
problem
>     > I am content with.
>     >
>     >
>     >Tom Petch
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>     >
>     > Please also address these issues when posting -21 to address
Benoit's
>     issues.  Please post -21 ASAP as Benoit has already placed this
draft on
>     the IESG telechat in a couple weeks.
>     >
>     > Thanks,
>     > Kent // shepherd
>     >
>     >
>     > On 2/14/18, 8:18 AM, "netmod on behalf of Benoit Claise"
>     <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]> on behalf
of
>     [e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>> wrote:
>     >
>     > Dear all,
>     >
>     > - the draft is NMDA compliant, right? It should be mentioned.
>     > Ex: draft-ietf-netmod-rfc7223bis-03, in the abstract and intro
>     >
>     >    The YANG model in this document conforms to the Network
Management
>     >
>     >    Datastore Architecture defined in
>     I-D.ietf-netmod-revised-datastores.
>     >
>     >
>     > - As mentioned in the writeup,
[I-D.ietf-netmod-yang-tree-diagrams]
>     should be an informative reference, not normative.
>     >
>     > - Editorial:
>     > OLD:
>     > This draft addresses the common leafs
>     > NEW:
>     > This document addresses the common leafs
>     >
>     > Please publish a new version asap.
>     > In the mean time, I'm sending this draft to IETF LC.
>     >
>     > Regards, Benoit
>     >
>     >
>     >
>
>
>     ------------------------------------------------------------------
------
>     --------
>
>
>     > _______________________________________________
>     > netmod mailing list
>     > [e-mail]
>     >
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.ietf.org_mailma
n_listinfo_netmod&d=DwICaQ&c=HAkYuh63rsuhr6Scbfh0UjBXeMK-ndb3voDTXcWzoCI
&r=9zkP0xnJUvZGJ9EPoOH7Yhqn2gsBYaGTvjISlaJdcZo&m=cJ7MVnQVc1hgxpVF7oYiVn6
Rbm-Qf2dDyrfYhL-s9io&s=u0Hn9GkO-B0jUGm1MnIQ4x4AgIZNXHBIaZhTPmt3dC8&e=
>     >
>
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     netmod mailing list
>     [e-mail]
>     https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
>
>
>