[netmod] NETMOD bottlenecks for draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-vrrp and draft-ietf-rtwg-yang-rip publications

Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com> Mon, 13 November 2017 02:02 UTC

Return-Path: <bclaise@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6A5D127005; Sun, 12 Nov 2017 18:02:35 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.519
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.519 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VJ8XGbkpKTSw; Sun, 12 Nov 2017 18:02:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from bgl-iport-1.cisco.com (bgl-iport-1.cisco.com [72.163.197.25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B0CD8126CB6; Sun, 12 Nov 2017 18:02:32 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=3422; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1510538553; x=1511748153; h=from:to:cc:subject:message-id:date:mime-version; bh=BYP78yZO8ugJRJtO37LHhYnv8DGrPNi8WrVI1YuuUww=; b=FhU3lodwrKaEfTRgXbM955asf7gAWwYAyh8jtpTzfYsmNaR94RHXKcFp W00qNXpREsjGDoo0BhnorjFfpVK+rLFIjnGyoDwkUXae1PlFDHzIMvvFg nc+1DWAxgzsh0CA1QKafDdc87n4OkwjQBebZb6EqHvSKgCmr5StlVV/JE Y=;
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="5.44,386,1505779200"; d="scan'208,217"; a="78661609"
Received: from vla196-nat.cisco.com (HELO bgl-core-4.cisco.com) ([72.163.197.24]) by bgl-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 13 Nov 2017 02:02:29 +0000
Received: from [10.75.234.179] (hkidc-vpn-client-234-179.cisco.com [10.75.234.179]) by bgl-core-4.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id vAD22Shc030222; Mon, 13 Nov 2017 02:02:28 GMT
From: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
To: NETMOD Working Group <netmod@ietf.org>, "ospf-chairs@ietf.org" <ospf-chairs@ietf.org>, "isis-chairs@ietf.org" <isis-chairs@ietf.org>
Cc: Routing WG <rtgwg-chairs@ietf.org>, Alia Atlas <akatlas@gmail.com>, Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <1332bb78-36a8-2888-2642-f08a30593a10@cisco.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2017 10:02:27 +0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------D4FC6AE8D9CEC46530C3275F"
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/HtsRR_pt5RMSVP6fQszXtokwtMw>
Subject: [netmod] NETMOD bottlenecks for draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-vrrp and draft-ietf-rtwg-yang-rip publications
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2017 02:02:36 -0000

Dear all,

Currently sitting in the rtgwg WG.
draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-vrrp and draft-ietf-rtwg-yang-rip are currently in 
AD review.
Let's look at the datatracker new YANG-related URLs to understand the 
impact analysis (the dependent YANG modules) for these two drafts:

  * https://www.yangcatalog.org/yang-search/impact_analysis.php?modules[]=ietf-vrrp@2017-10-25.yang&recurse=0&rfcs=1&show_subm=1&show_dir=both
  * https://www.yangcatalog.org/yang-search/impact_analysis.php?modules[]=ietf-rip@2017-10-25.yang&recurse=0&rfcs=1&show_subm=1&show_dir=both

So the bottlenecks for standardization are:

  * draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-vrrp:
      o RFC7223bis: ietf-interfaces
      o RFC7277bis: ietf-ip

  * draft-ietf-rtwg-yang-rip:
      o RFC7223bis: ietf-interfaces
      o RFC7277bis: ietf-ip
      o RFC8022bis: ietf-routing
      o draft-ietf-ospf-yang: ietf-ospf (draft status: still ID-exists)
      o draft-ietf-isis-yang-isis-cfg: ietf-isis (draft status: still
        ID-exists)

So the ask to close on RFC7223bis, RFC7277bis, and RFC8022bis asap.
I understand the LC will start soon for these drafts.

Regards, Benoit