Re: [netmod] YANG module security considerations

"Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com> Mon, 11 December 2017 18:43 UTC

Return-Path: <acee@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5D781287A0 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Dec 2017 10:43:55 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.521
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.521 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4_c6N4B8rHts for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Dec 2017 10:43:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alln-iport-5.cisco.com (alln-iport-5.cisco.com [173.37.142.92]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E2832128799 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Dec 2017 10:43:53 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1454; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1513017833; x=1514227433; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: content-id:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=0Q57+TR/Q99Ph2oG4qga+bYwf1ILKslWiGvsiw0ZNtU=; b=OFs8X6LsjbVSiWgQ8TUBjDdodoafUeFohmpTxfI9jHyH48MSJxXugrs6 T/rHn6Ke8wGCgwuK4IWMcuuVv/N6aG8W0AgI1l9pHxYb2I0FcVvZxbSs8 GhLUE1tgvrj0PaMkKX1uiVXvu05I3mOuPH7bKP/tPGhewyk0IgOA8lFBa Q=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0DYAACH0S5a/4oNJK1bGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQcBAQEBAYM+ZnQnB4N7iiGOfpkJghUKGAuESU8CGoRYPxgBAQEBAQEBAQFrKIUjAgEDAQEhETobAgEIGgImAgICJQsVEAIEARKKKBCoH4InimQBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBGgWBD4JZgguGaoUfgxWCYwWjEQKHd40ok2ONCoknAhEZAYE6AR85gU9vFTqCKYRVeIhKgRUBAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.45,392,1508803200"; d="scan'208";a="42661788"
Received: from alln-core-5.cisco.com ([173.36.13.138]) by alln-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 11 Dec 2017 18:43:53 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-012.cisco.com (xch-rtp-012.cisco.com [64.101.220.152]) by alln-core-5.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id vBBIhq0a007998 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 11 Dec 2017 18:43:53 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com (64.101.220.155) by XCH-RTP-012.cisco.com (64.101.220.152) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1320.4; Mon, 11 Dec 2017 13:43:51 -0500
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) by XCH-RTP-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) with mapi id 15.00.1320.000; Mon, 11 Dec 2017 13:43:51 -0500
From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
To: Ladislav Lhotka <lhotka@nic.cz>, NETMOD WG <netmod@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [netmod] YANG module security considerations
Thread-Index: AQHTap3F7g0FwBEM3EyaV4KKH3WKjKM+iraA
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2017 18:43:51 +0000
Message-ID: <D6543BBB.E0E2A%acee@cisco.com>
References: <1512130382.9397.20.camel@nic.cz>
In-Reply-To: <1512130382.9397.20.camel@nic.cz>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.116.152.198]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <83775165FD1EB34AAA4118D6DAB1C5DA@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/I02eKOobquL4K45qJiyd5s1-gOo>
Subject: Re: [netmod] YANG module security considerations
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2017 18:43:56 -0000

Hi Lada, et al, 

I haven’t seen any response to this. Your suggestion seems to me to be
more technically accurate.

Thanks,
Acee 

On 12/1/17, 7:13 AM, "netmod on behalf of Ladislav Lhotka"
<netmod-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of lhotka@nic.cz> wrote:

>Hi,
>
>the security considerations template text [1] that has already been used
>in a
>number of documents is apparently incorrect - YANG modules aren't
>accessed by NM
>protocols. Hence
>
>OLD
>
>The YANG module defined in this document is designed to be accessed via
>network
>management protocols such as ...
>
>NEW
>
>The YANG module specified in this document defines a schema for data that
>is
>designed to be accessed via network management protocols such as ...
>
>
>[1] https://trac.ietf.org/trac/ops/wiki/yang-security-guidelines
>
>Lada
>
>-- 
>Ladislav Lhotka
>Head, CZ.NIC Labs
>PGP Key ID: 0xB8F92B08A9F76C67
>
>_______________________________________________
>netmod mailing list
>netmod@ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod