Re: [netmod] Kathleen Moriarty's Discuss on draft-ietf-netmod-rfc7277bis-01: (with DISCUSS)

Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com> Tue, 09 January 2018 07:40 UTC

Return-Path: <bclaise@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BA5D12D80E; Mon, 8 Jan 2018 23:40:13 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.51
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.51 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TFCWuhNqkDfL; Mon, 8 Jan 2018 23:40:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from aer-iport-2.cisco.com (aer-iport-2.cisco.com [173.38.203.52]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B8192126B7F; Mon, 8 Jan 2018 23:40:10 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1050; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1515483611; x=1516693211; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date: mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=9xqS2fKffLr6PXA0DmY0mrwKsnDSRUJQSSd2GR5CHaU=; b=V4acYbYylnch4dG7H7G1ZDVQn0gIoDXR42kz/SFVfvOsY6JEZR9cePZT VCgsxKQtG3LN6trXwzqKGD1QDAuGcC6ThR8JRsDvbZ28Zj9FNrRmkuNmO 249R8FYngRun9TBLoyuv6cVz9FEzGsdyprICNhO7570ZAZjC5Yuf307z6 0=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0BzAQCpcFRa/xbLJq1eGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQcBAQEBAYQmdCeEB4sYj2qJCJA4CiOFGAKEeRQBAQEBAQEBAQFrKIUkAQUjFUEQCw4KAgImAgIhNgYBDAYCAQGKFAMVEK8CgieHRg2CcAEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBARgFgQ+DEYNsghKDBYJrRAGFBYJlBYpTmE49iAqIN4UAgheGGYNvh2qNND+BHogHgTw2IoFQMhoIGxWCZ4MJgU9ANwGKWAEBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.46,334,1511827200"; d="scan'208";a="1343367"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-3.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 09 Jan 2018 07:40:08 +0000
Received: from [10.55.221.36] (ams-bclaise-nitro3.cisco.com [10.55.221.36]) by aer-core-3.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id w097e8xv020697; Tue, 9 Jan 2018 07:40:08 GMT
To: Martin Bjorklund <mbj@tail-f.com>, Kathleen.Moriarty.ietf@gmail.com
Cc: netmod-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-netmod-rfc7277bis@ietf.org, iesg@ietf.org, netmod@ietf.org
References: <151544838502.11225.12200905325785852409.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <20180109.082711.971204319569734613.mbj@tail-f.com>
From: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <4000af84-77c5-1b57-a0da-23aa735ce38d@cisco.com>
Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2018 08:40:08 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.5.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20180109.082711.971204319569734613.mbj@tail-f.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/IIDKaEwKw3Je29vrdY-i9nfoMzA>
Subject: Re: [netmod] Kathleen Moriarty's Discuss on draft-ietf-netmod-rfc7277bis-01: (with DISCUSS)
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2018 07:40:13 -0000

On 1/9/2018 8:27 AM, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Kathleen Moriarty <Kathleen.Moriarty.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> DISCUSS:
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I'm a little confused on the Security Consideration section as it doesn't use
>> the latest template, but does specify SSH for NETCONF, so I'm good with that
>> part.  Will RESTCONF also be used as a transport or is there some reason it
>> won't be used for this YANG module?
>>
>> Here's what I think is the latest template and please let me know if sections
>> of it do not apply to this draft and I'll drop the discuss for correcting the
>> security considerations section.
>>
>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6087bis-10#page-52
> I have updated to the latest version in my local copy.
Thanks Martin.
The IETF LC finishes today. So please post a new version tomorrow.

Regards, B.
>
>
> /martin
>
> .
>