Re: [netmod] Regarding IPR on draft-tao-netmod-yang-node-tags-06

Andy Bierman <> Mon, 30 November 2020 14:05 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95B5A3A0B6C for <>; Mon, 30 Nov 2020 06:05:16 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.887
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.887 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1dOVJ-pmMqhX for <>; Mon, 30 Nov 2020 06:05:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::130]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C60483A0B62 for <>; Mon, 30 Nov 2020 06:05:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: by with SMTP id a9so21850139lfh.2 for <>; Mon, 30 Nov 2020 06:05:14 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=u0aQ/OIgR2azDc0If1EuBts4MrX96i/zxFepyzoamGk=; b=VspuIBRia20RMcWUbzPcnNHKidY6RZCWXVNtz4eJF/hOh74eTZa1BrlcgBXHX75/Od 7L/jCL5k/SYZo+WtNGLv7flYH0x8hFJfjLedpiM5KWWMTSmUCQ9UbkLwZXVzyFBce7Ep uTK3112bu68K42Ibh5a6hSSFvRxMp4i6VmLLQcR9Xy6cdGb5ZiP0EyE247Ucq8b4IIIJ BySio1iBY4/MGNBaD7OEmaQIHbIczrdHbkmll1Ok5V8cGyHTTfTNsvUo1RPjbcyhltAT fQ7u9qLOo19N6kbiu7u+HEIcjQQA4jiVMDGtdMFuMbiFvJiWwC7zpikcL+Y7aSSsSx8V fIOA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=u0aQ/OIgR2azDc0If1EuBts4MrX96i/zxFepyzoamGk=; b=o9mp93BYVOCNdMyh2oHzeGbZVrMZedWifa4Lc5SXyEz9hSH33HyMXoEL0vlmCSOCPb e8+NU6cfYd8JS30sXNAWGjwSS1HUA+IeCDuKLBpPRpq9Qp+4tVWGAWeroGVZnDnJN6Le S/gHqOG7hdSvhuXdLukmQvrDPVC4g1x2jtanh9aRhf81CUcREytq+vHw69yWAbLB++ku w7Lf2+0NsUiqnfVTZ97Ln33klZ5lrx8xcvDaGf3ZgHX170mPUlLJqyMmASv7XWD8qsaa Hqyo+eYAxJAqV23V29zAuLtFFCMcli1azPUlNaI8YPBrWht6Z/OiOiGTLqMiQUfmxu5C Vbfw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532vAoEbypukfnhjFBCBsIWcX3YvOXFCVzLaiX6b0dZx0qi5MZCg en1TUIj7f8QgBrOQg85zojwU/XHuwA5/vqB1UasRWQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyXtfoNjnXqhhisQS9B/1e68j8ljEXRi1OFrxaD7WdbE8rIc+0ikMfLkJ4vBbolIFscznEBm4KbdaPma7pcJik=
X-Received: by 2002:a19:ec09:: with SMTP id b9mr9728132lfa.178.1606745112596; Mon, 30 Nov 2020 06:05:12 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <> <>
In-Reply-To: <>
From: Andy Bierman <>
Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2020 06:05:01 -0800
Message-ID: <>
To: Kent Watsen <>
Cc: "taoran (F)" <>, Qin Wu <>, Benoit Claise <>, Liang Geng|耿亮 <>,,, "" <>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000ae91f705b5537fbe"
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [netmod] Regarding IPR on draft-tao-netmod-yang-node-tags-06
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2020 14:05:17 -0000

"No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"


On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 3:02 PM Kent Watsen <> wrote:

> Authors,
> Per the 109 session, it is the chairs intent to do another adoption call
> on the "yang-node-tags” draft.  In preparation for that, we’ve determined
> both that the draft has changed significantly and that there is a new
> author, and therefore feel it necessary to issue another IPR call, as
> follows:
> Authors, Contributors, WG,
> As part of preparation for WG Adoption:
> Are you aware of any IPR that applies to drafts identified above?
> Please state either:
> "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"
> or
> "Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft"
> If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
> (see RFCs 3669, 5378 and 8179 for more details)?
> If yes to the above, please state either:
> "Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules"
> or
> "No, the IPR has not been disclosed"
> If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think
> appropriate.
> We note that all DT members are listed as contributors.  If you
> contributed to the document please respond.  Alternatively, please feel
> free to state that you didn't materially contribute to the draft and
> would like your name removed from the contribution section (and moved to
> acknowledgments after WG adoption).
> If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer the
> above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are
> aware of any relevant IPR. This document will not advance to the next
> stage until a response has been received from each author.
> If you are on the WG email list or attend WG meetings but are not listed
> as an author or contributor, we remind you of your obligations under
> the IETF IPR rules which encourages you to notify the IETF if you are
> aware of IPR of others on an IETF contribution, or to refrain from
> participating in any contribution or discussion related to your
> undisclosed IPR. For more information, please see the RFCs listed above
> and
> Thank you,
> NETMOD WG Chairs
> PS Please include all listed in the headers of this message in your
> response.
> _______________________________________________
> netmod mailing list