Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-acl-model-14

I agree with Acee, would like to see the example he mentions removed in case people try to copy it. But otherwise I am happy to see this document published.

Cheers,

Einar

On 26 Oct 2017, at 10:46, Acee Lindem (acee) <acee@cisco.com<mailto:acee@cisco.com>> wrote:

Hi Mahesh,

On 10/25/17, 9:22 PM, "Mahesh Jethanandani" <mjethanandani@gmail.com<mailto:mjethanandani@gmail.com>>
wrote:

Acee,

Thanks for reviewing the draft.

On Oct 25, 2017, at 6:21 AM, Acee Lindem (acee) <acee@cisco.com<mailto:acee@cisco.com>> wrote:

Hi Kent, Mahesh, et al,

I have read the draft and support publication. I have two comments on
the
-14 version.

1. The tree diagrams do not fit within the draft pages. Note that
recent
versions of pyang support the —tree-line-length parameter and this may
help.

I used the —tree-line-length=72 as the parameter to generate the tree,
and that is why you see the line wrap around.

I guess then you need to manually format it so it fits.

2. While it is non-normative, I’d prefer to have appendix A.1 removed.
It was a mistake for vendors to mix packet filtering and route filtering
in the first place and the draft should not insinuate that the model
will
be augmented to do this.

The example is just an example of how the model can be extended. There is
no implication that the model will be augmented to support mixing of
packet filtering with route filtering.

I understand that. However, it is more an example of how it should not be
used. Do you really want to publish this?

Thanks,
Acee

Thanks,
Acee

On 10/20/17, 5:37 PM, "netmod on behalf of Kent Watsen"
<netmod-bounces@ietf.org<mailto:netmod-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of kwatsen@juniper.net<mailto:kwatsen@juniper.net>> wrote:

All,

This starts a two-week working group last call on
draft-ietf-netmod-acl-model-14.

The working group last call ends on November 3.
Please send your comments to the netmod mailing list.

Positive comments, e.g., "I've reviewed this document
and believe it is ready for publication", are welcome!
This is useful and important, even from authors.

Could the authors, explicitly CC-ed on this email, please
also confirm at this time that they are unaware of any
IPR related to this draft.

Thank you,
Netmod Chairs

_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
netmod@ietf.org<mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod

_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
netmod@ietf.org<mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod

Mahesh Jethanandani
mjethanandani@gmail.com<mailto:mjethanandani@gmail.com>

_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
netmod@ietf.org<mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod