IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-rfc7223bis-00

Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com> Mon, 04 December 2017 02:46 UTC

Return-Path: <bill.wu@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E2DD124B18; Sun, 3 Dec 2017 18:46:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.221
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.221 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id geTstFRROrAG; Sun, 3 Dec 2017 18:46:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 250661200C1; Sun, 3 Dec 2017 18:46:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lhreml707-cah.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.7.107]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 4997BCADC9689; Mon, 4 Dec 2017 02:46:19 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from NKGEML412-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.98.56.73) by lhreml707-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.48) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.361.1; Mon, 4 Dec 2017 02:46:20 +0000
Received: from NKGEML513-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.2.231]) by nkgeml412-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.73]) with mapi id 14.03.0361.001; Mon, 4 Dec 2017 10:46:14 +0800
From: Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com>
To: Kent Watsen <kwatsen@juniper.net>, "netmod@ietf.org" <netmod@ietf.org>
CC: "netmod-chairs@ietf.org" <netmod-chairs@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-rfc7223bis-00
Thread-Index: AQHTaH8mwis2iZPDB0aqvQnmsEUf+6MyghdA
Date: Mon, 04 Dec 2017 02:46:14 +0000
Message-ID: <B8F9A780D330094D99AF023C5877DABA9ACFA477@nkgeml513-mbs.china.huawei.com>
References: <10B5698A-BC7B-432E-A931-9069FA7BB03C@juniper.net>
In-Reply-To: <10B5698A-BC7B-432E-A931-9069FA7BB03C@juniper.net>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.136.79.67]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/K9riJBpGkIoi6E3qSH9loQ-1ZYE>
Subject: Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-rfc7223bis-00
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Dec 2017 02:46:23 -0000

I have read this draft and believe it is ready for publication.
One question I have is why rfc7223bis not reference NMDA guidelines since it get in line with NMDA guideline, or NMDA guideline has been 
merged into rfc6087bis?
Should this draft reference rfc6087bis?

-Qin
-----邮件原件-----
发件人: netmod [mailto:netmod-bounces@ietf.org] 代表 Kent Watsen
发送时间: 2017年11月29日 3:29
收件人: netmod@ietf.org
抄送: netmod-chairs@ietf.org
主题: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-rfc7223bis-00

All,

This starts a two-week working group last call on draft-ietf-netmod-rfc7223bis-00.

Please recall that this update's intention is to modify the YANG module to be in line with the NMDA guidelines [1].  Reviewing the diff between the two drafts [2] should reveal just this.

The working group last call ends on December 12.
Please send your comments to the netmod mailing list.

Positive comments, e.g., "I've reviewed this document and believe it is ready for publication", are welcome!
This is useful and important, even from authors.

[1] https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-dsdt-nmda-guidelines-01
[2] https://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-netmod-rfc7223bis-00.txt

Thank you,
Netmod Chairs


_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
netmod@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email